Galaxy Colonization Manual

I saw the author say on Zhihu before: What they wrote is wrong, let me do it! I was also thinking that it was another one pretending to be 13, but I didn't expect that after watching some of it, I couldn't put it down. Writing a book with this kind of subject matter actually abandons the combat element and discusses the rationality of various worlds in a large space, while also taking into account the fun points. The author is indeed a hard-core boss.

It feels like this girl may be a failure, and the protagonist gradually shifts to a supporting role. Although the author of the latest chapter explains that she is not the Virgin, it feels like it is to forcibly highlight the character of the little girl, which feels very abrupt. To be honest, I haven't found out much about this planet yet. Isn't this girl afraid of stirring up trouble? Didn't I mention before that this planet has inherited technological weapons from the past galactic era? The author described his friends on Earth as detectives, but he let himself go when he arrived in another world. I wanted to say this many times.

Of the author's two novels, I first finished the second one, and then slowly completed the first one. As far as my personal taste is concerned, I prefer the author's first novel. Of course, I also like the author's second novel very much. Both novels are very exciting, but of course the focus is different. As the author himself said, Lingshi Crisis is from the Ming Dynasty. Many plots in the novel gave me a strong sense of déjà vu while reading it. However, this sense of déjà vu really resonated with me, but it did not give me enough surprises. Just like the feeling when watching the Ming Dynasty, we can understand, analyze and interpret the wonderful game of the various forces, but we can never break away from the centralized monarchy. What we see are the various actions and choices of various characters in the various forces under the general trend. Although the various world ecologies described in the first book also gave me a sense of déjà vu when I was watching 1984, Brave New World, Alien, Matrix, etc., The rational construction and explanation of each planet and world also gave me enough freshness, especially the final restart plan and the origin of human civilization on earth, which gave me an indescribable sense of surprise. Regarding how the ancient Galactic Federation came to its demise step by step, although the description of the bureaucratic political ecology here is not as detailed and profound as the Lingshi Crisis, just as the interpretation of the Republic in this regard cannot be compared with that of the Ming Dynasty. However, as an adventure story that prefers interstellar exploration and traces the birth and evolution of various human civilizations, this book does not need to be further explored. We only need to understand its existence and influence. Sometimes I see many perfectionists in the comment area criticizing the completeness and rationality of the world and plot construction, which is understandable. However, after all, novels and stories are an entertainment reading, and it is understandable to make concessions for the sake of the story and plot. Although the author is also a perfectionist and will not give it a chance easily, haha. The emotional drama in this book did feel strange to me when I was reading it, but if you are too obsessed with it, why not read some emotionally satisfying novels. Most of the readers who can read this book are probably not here for the emotional drama. The completion of this novel is indeed faster than expected, but overall, the author has basically filled in all the pitfalls, and everyone's ending is also paved with a rough and gray line. In terms of story alone, in my opinion, it is a relatively satisfactory ending. This is how Lu Yang's main story ends. No matter how experienced an adventurer is, he will eventually withdraw from the stage of the story. How the various civilizations of the galactic human race will develop and evolve in the future, and how the earth's human civilization will develop correctly under the care of the restart plan, is the same as the situation we face when we move towards a republic. It is unpredictable and we have to wait for civilization to bloom.

Hahaha, I only watched it after a friend recommended it. It's free for seven days when I download the app. I've watched 60% of it. Let's talk about the problems seen from a female perspective. It's a family story. I'll add more after reading it

Come on, update, or send me a kitchen knife?

Damn, this novel ruins all fairy tale and fantasy novels. (Only for me) Since reading this book, every time I read Classical Fairy Tales, I have been thinking, thousands of years have passed, how can the economy be so stable? Using spiritual stones as currency, spiritual stones have already risen to the point where monks at the golden elixir stage can no longer afford foundation-building elixirs. Look at Gao Wu, Gan! I believe that high-ranking warriors can remain as stable as nuclear deterrence for a short period of time, but I cannot imagine that this Cold War-like relationship can last for tens of thousands of years. Mathematics tells us that the unstable state will inevitably tilt towards the stable state. But this gave me an idea. Because the number of ancient cultivators continued to increase, there was no breakthrough in cultivation technology, per capita resources decreased, and no one understood economic theory, a catastrophe broke out in the cultivation world. What about this idea?

This writing style, this plot, I believe it is called "Xiling's Abnormality". Is this a book that can be written now? ? ? The author belongs to nb

In fact, what most readers think of science fiction is that there is nothing fantasy or magic in the underlying settings, but they often ignore the rationality of the deductions made from the underlying settings. I read this chapter and said that many book friends complained about not being science fiction. In fact, there is really no need to read Qidian. Com. The true science fiction in Qidian Science Fiction Zone (the settings and deductions are all reasonable and rigorous) should be at least one out of 10,000 books in the science fiction cover (the settings and deductions are all unscientific), and often fake science fiction tends to have a wider audience and much better results. While the book friends are complaining about this book, they are actually suppressing the center party in science fiction, because the deduction in this book is very reasonable and a lot of effort has been spent. Therefore, you cannot deny the science fiction nature of this book just because it has the underlying setting of traveling through the world of immortality and fantasy. To use "Dead Fire" to request this book is actually nitpicking. If you really have such strict tastes, I suggest you read other "science fiction" online articles on the list, or simply uninstall Qidian and read Asimov.

Looking at the starting point, only one or two readable novels can be produced from a thousand novels. We must lock this rare author in a cage for future generations to admire.

Hello everyone, I am a time and space administrator, and I am now providing 500 time travel opportunities for free! Just reply 1 to get a free time travel opportunity, the quantity is limited, first come first served! Cities, martial arts, cultivating immortals, gods and Buddhas, the multiverse, you can go wherever you want and reach the pinnacle of life, just this time! What are you waiting for?

First of all, this book is a good book. Even if the author and my thinking are not quite right, I have to admit that it is a good book. The biggest advantage of this book is its self-consistent logic, but the shortcoming is the author's point of view. The author describes an impossible triangle in the book, that is, a social order, ideas, and equality. Only two of them can be obtained. The author's point of view is generally not to be equal. I can't comment on the good or bad of this view. I can only say that those who are acceptable should be able to read it, and those who are not acceptable will sooner or later be driven away by the private goods in the book.

It made me laugh so hard that I used the AI ​​novel writing software to continue writing chapter 522, and the writing turned out to be quite smooth. It makes me laugh so much.

The setting is good, but the plot is really stretched, like a popular science book interspersed with interesting stories. As a novel, it is too poor in elements.

The old science fiction fan said that as long as the writing is not ruined, he will continue to pursue it to the end.

"I Found a Treasure" is very similar to the book "Big Eyeball". It is shocking and humorous. It is ordinary yet magnificent, especially the little bit. The story brings out the whole world. It is great.

Haha, one glance at this novel shows that the author's academic qualifications and IQ are not low. I have only read the chapter on Cultivation and Finance, which is very interesting. I will read the others later.

Today's two chapters 499-500 are a bit awkward for me. Haida doesn't know much about philosophy. Out of an attitude of striving for excellence, I will make some notes. {"NickName":"King of Health","UserId":336832380} 1. I will mainly talk about philosophy, and I will make some announcements in advance. It is difficult to say what the mainstream opinions of philosophers are. Philosophers can be said to be the group with the least consensus in the world. When you ask whether A is right or B is right, philosophers will not be divided into faction A and faction B. They will often be divided into factions such as 123456789 and so on. It can be said that almost every logically possible viewpoint is defended by philosophers (this part is related to the need to publish papers), but there are still relatively many, and although there is little consensus, the viewpoints may be similar but different. After roughly thinking about the examples I can give, theories such as physicalism, social liberalism, epistemological foundationalism, scientific realism, and semantic representation theory are all relatively majority views among philosophers. I will report some terms for interested students to search, but I do not recommend using Baidu, let alone trusting Baidu Encyclopedia 2. Regarding ethics: There are roughly three types of ethics in the world. One is descriptive ethics, which studies the moral concepts of people in different cultures or even the same culture. For example, the difference in concepts about euthanasia between Eastern and Western people is probably mainly studied and explored by psychologists, economists, anthropologists, and historians. There is also normative ethics, which studies how true morality requires people to act. For example, whether euthanasia is moral or not is mainly studied and explored by normative ethicists among philosophers. There is also a third type of ethics, metaethics, which studies what people are talking about when they talk about morality and what morality is. For example, which of the arguments such as moral relativism, moral nihilism, moral non-cognitivism, moral naturalism, etc. Is right and good, is mainly studied and explored by metaethicists among philosophers. 3. Regarding the cockroach paradox: The relatively majority opinion among philosophers is that civilization and culture themselves lack value. All moral weight of a collective comes from each individual that makes up the collective. There is no collective value that transcends individuals. If we talk about the value of civilization, then it has and can only have the value of being a tool, that is, accompanying the needs of individual growth and positioning their identity. Therefore, as long as all human beings voluntarily transform into cockroaches, philosophers usually have no opinion. Whether to call it human civilization or whether it is extinct is just a word game. 4. Although not the majority, there have always been philosophers who advocate strong animal rights theory, the most famous of which is Peter Singer. His book "Animal Liberation" is the bible of animal protectionism. His view can be roughly explained as: all individuals with sentient abilities are morally equal objects. This is why plants are not objects of moral concern, they lack sentience. Singer calls anti-animal rights advocates speciesists. Although I don't agree with his point of view, I have to say that his point of view is a pretty good point of view in philosophy, or a good theory (this is because it is currently difficult to find a very precise standard that can distinguish animals and humans, especially if you think about the difference between babies and ordinary animals. Most philosophical theories that reject Singer's point of view have flaws in this regard, which is why although I am a speciesist, I recognize more extreme strong animal rights theorists than weak animal rights theories. This is an appreciation of the theory). However, as mentioned before, almost every logically possible view is defended by philosophers. There are indeed extreme environmentalist philosophers who believe that plants and even the entire ecological environment are worthy of protection, but their views are not philosophically better than Singer's, and in my opinion are even worse. 5. About I think, therefore I am: This proposition is not old, and it is not an idealist proposition. The philosopher who proposed it was the 17th-century entity dualist Descartes (the same Descartes who proposed the coordinate system and one person riding two horses. In contemporary times, entity dualism has declined, but property dualism is still very important. Thrive, property dualism is a kind of entity physicalism. Philosophers who are neither property dualism nor property physicalism are already very rare in the philosophical world. ) This sentence can be interpreted in two ways: the fact that I think about it can confirm the fact that I exist/the fact that I exist cannot be doubted. Roughly speaking, Descartes imagined a God-level demon who could even deceive you into believing a wrong logical law, such as making you believe 1≠1, but he found that the prerequisite for him to be deceived was that he must exist. Without Descartes, Descartes would not have been deceived, so the existence was confirmed from thinking. And this thought experiment shows that my existence is more unquestionable than the logical law of 1≠1, so my existence is unquestionable (note that "I" here cannot be understood as self or self-will, "I" is just an index word) This proposition is mainly an epistemological proposition in philosophy. Those who do not understand epistemology can replace it with cognitive psychology. Of course, this substitution The change is very, very, very imprecise, but there is a famous philosopher Quin who likes this (inexactly, he believes that epistemology should be abolished and replaced by cognitive psychology) 6. The brain in a vat is a modern refined version of Descartes' demon, proposed by the philosopher Putnam in order to defend his theoretical semantic externalism. What he means is that through semantic externalism we can confirm that we are indeed not the brain in the vat. But the brain in the vat is much better than the devil. With some adjustments, semantic externalism can resist the brain in the vat but not the devil. In addition, whether semantic externalism is correct is one of the hot topics debated by philosophers.

This novel is too wordy and misses the point. I don't know whether the author wants to write about the protagonist exploring interstellar secrets or the protagonist fighting monsters and upgrading. Without a focus, the expression will be confusing, wordy, and watery. If you want the protagonist to write so many chapters on an energy issue, you can definitely have the protagonist discover energy on the first planet. I read the book while skipping. It seems that others can connect to the protagonist's host machine later, and can be the protagonist's offline, and can clearly know their every move. You can completely write it as a behind-the-scenes flow, let those offline to work, and let the offline to explore , otherwise the progress of the protagonist alone will be too slow and dragging.

I can only say that the front part is very good, and the little science part is also very good But maybe the author is too obsessed with the happy ending of making dumplings, and would rather sacrifice rationality and even engage in deus ex machina than BE, which leads to the collapse of the second part. 1. Galaxy Princess, that level of artificial intelligence can actually disobey human orders, no matter how you think about it, it makes people sweat. Wisdom has not been born for so many years, but it was born at a critical moment, a perfect setting for a popcorn movie. For those who don't know, I think this book also has the setting of a machine soul 2. It's still Princess Galaxy. I really don't understand what the author thinks about the part about the park designer. Thousands of years have passed and the Princess of the Galaxy is still in an ordinary device? Is it because the protagonist has not been here for thousands of years that time has stood still? 3. Bai Zhu, uh uh, why are you just looking? At the finale, I had no idea what I was doing. I was just a tool man talking about settings. It gives the impression that you can die after finishing speaking, and this is the final boss? 2. Guo Ning, this one is even more heavyweight and a pure mechanical god. The author also complained about his own "One-Punch Man". The problem is that he adopted a cheerful and funny style. The encounters of different characters are the focus, so he can make Saitama's one-punch man. What kind of style do you imitate from other people's deus ex machina? The villain boss tried his best and was finally punched to death by the protagonist. It pays homage to the famous scene in episode 12, right? Fortunately, I read too few chapters and was afraid that he would end it badly or become an eunuch. I just jumped to the ending after reading about a hundred chapters. Otherwise, it would be so bad that I would be so angry that I would vomit blood.

Come on, author! It's really touching. The protagonist's action logic is very comfortable! Please be sure to write it down

This logic becomes more and more unreliable as it goes on. The financial aspect is written so realistically that the characters' logic is ridiculously poor, which is also funny.

To be honest, apart from some political and philosophical views that pop up from time to time, which are at best called Social Democratic tendencies, and at worst called vulgar historical views, this book is very, very interesting. I hope the author can work hard to overcome it when writing next (less touching on economic/political philosophy), otherwise it will be very easy to be persuaded to give up.

I feel like this book needs a lot of airwaves. If I get it right, I like it very much. If I don't get it right, I'll find it boring. Personally, I think this is one of my favorite books I have read this year. I have just finished the second volume. The reading experience is very comfortable and unique. (I just don't know what happens next, I haven't finished reading it yet)

Very well written, a masterpiece 🙂

I have finished reading the book. It is very interesting, but it is difficult to describe my inner surprise in words... Also, I personally feel that Ma Tianyi has the most charming personality in the whole book. I really like this character so much.

The fourth volume of "Scientific Tribunal" is really well written, and it is the tragedy that touches people's hearts the most.

How can I put it this way? The protagonist is not brainless. After watching a dozen or so pictures, it's pretty good. Come on (ง •̀_•́)ง

Damn it, why are there so many ghosts and monsters in the comment section of this book? They can't even express their opinions😅😅

Good-looking is really good-looking, and the water is also real water

Why was it deleted from my bookshelf? After watching Spiritual Stone Crisis, I felt the need to make up for it.