I Slayed the Dragon in the Late Ming Dynasty

One of the few historical time-travel articles that does not talk about the so-called "kings (lords) and generals (generals)", and it can indeed be seen in the article that the author has a certain understanding of the "class () history view". At the same time, it also appropriately exposes some of the exploitation and feudal concepts and systems in the old society that restrict individual behavior and thoughts. In today's Internet writing environment where vulgarity and greed are prevalent, with better and plain writing, it is really refreshing. Among them, the description of the protagonist's "old mother", who suddenly found a stranger who resembled her son, the protagonist, because it was difficult to determine whether he was her son, and the description of how Suyun, who had served and cared for her for many years, easily reneged on her promise, in my opinion, really hit the nail on the head. The poisonous feudal ideology and the low status of feudal women were immediately obvious. However, it still needs to be mentioned. The intelligent comrade codenamed "Blue Star" in the article has certain logical contradictions in his character. That is to say, while teaching the protagonist not to just face the individuals in the system, but to choose to face the system itself. This intelligent comrade always behaves contrary to his words. If it is excusable to kill the traitor in anger, then when he sees the typical old mother who is "eager to love her son" and is poisoned by feudal ideas, this intelligent gentleman should show a kind of sadness for her as an individual, and then turn to anger at the poisonous influence of the "Three () Programs () and Five () Permanences" itself on the people's minds. Otherwise, there will always be shouting and killing, and it will be difficult to see the influence of Mr. Intelligent's existence on the protagonist's thinking, so that the protagonist's changes in the later stage may become abrupt. In addition, the description of the protagonist in the article, especially due to the influence of the previous article, when the protagonist is a people's teacher, his behavior may appear childish, but his ideological field should not be vulgar. Civilization rather than vulgarity, just like the proletarians are not all hooligans and proletarians, they can also be idealists and moral persons. This needs to be made clear. Finally, let me say a few words in passing. Maybe it's a bit cliché to have a young master as a substitute, but it still might as well show the expression of thoughts. As long as it can be thoughtful, how can it be said to be bad? As seen above, this description is based on the protagonist's vision and has a profound effect on the establishment of the feudal society. From my point of view, how can I say it is bad? So cruel!

I have read more than 20 chapters, and I just think that Blue Star is very naive, and the protagonist is also very naive, so I want to ask who said "political power emerges from the barrel of a gun". In this chaotic world at the end of the Ming Dynasty, only tyrannical force can wipe out everything. Blue Star's idea of spreading revolutionary ideas is simply the worst of scams. In fact, there is only one way for them to go. It's about "fighting local tycoons and dividing their fields." Those interest groups will never collude with them. I suggest the author not to go astray. This is a cool article (this is the key point). I also thought it was a cool article, but after reading the author's single chapter, I no longer think so. The above are some of my thoughts and suggestions after reading the author's single chapter.

Can you stop explaining the history to us and write more storylines?

In the chapters entering the city gate, the protagonist is procrastinating, imbecile, and has a bad attitude. We haven't even entered the city gate yet, but we are ready to kill everyone. Are these people here to sell things or are they here to fight? You can't even distinguish between priorities, so you still want to start a big business? What else has the previous experience affected my mentality? I don't see the wisdom, decisiveness, and sense that I should have in this protagonist. From the description of the protagonist in the first few chapters, I thought how high his level was! In the end, I got in through the trick of being a young master who ran away.

Comrade the author, you might as well describe more about the little people at the bottom of society who are small bourgeois, tenant farmers and the like, in addition to the protagonists. Because, regarding the picture of the late Ming Dynasty, I always feel that there is still not enough development, and it is still difficult to reflect the urgent need for reform in the old society. There are too many theories about the exploitation of people that are divorced from actual events and cases, and cannot be well integrated with the story. Therefore, although I feel resentful, it is nothing more than resentful. I believe that many readers like me will never feel the same way. If I can focus on things, supplement them with principles, and cite them properly, I will be able to understand them with reason and move them with emotion. The interpretation of the story can also be improved to a higher level. Of course, this is just a small suggestion from me. 🙂

You can take a look, it's a very good story.

This writing style is good, not white, come on

The writing is ok. From a planning point of view, the book is written clearly, and education comes first.

Chongzhen is the last backbone of our Han nation. If you knock him down, can the protagonist be able to support him?

The content written by the author is too scattered, and the main line and key points are not clear. As I read it, I felt confused. Those explanations and information should follow the main line and serve as supplements, instead of one left and right, making people more and more confused. The time-travel identity setting should be straightforward and simple. There is no need to explain so much. The more explanations, the more loopholes there will be.