I'm Just a Supporting Teacher

The essence of support education is universal education, and the essence of this system is elite education. This is in itself a conflict. Regardless of whether you are utilitarian or not, based on this essential difference, you should not write about support education. If you write about ordinary teachers in other places, they are better than this.

I remember there was a book a few years ago about the education system. The protagonist became the principal. Within the scope of his school, the qualifications of all students and teachers would be improved. It was like everyone was like a dragon...

Isn't it free for a limited time? Don't you still need to top up money in the end?

Personally, I feel that the first 50% to 60% of this book is still acceptable, but the rest is unreadable. It feels like I'm running out of words for the rest of the story. I feel that this kind of mediocre book is a test of the author's ability in all aspects. I have read a book before, and the content was more bland than this one, but I enjoyed it while reading it. There are still a lot of interesting things in this book, but I don't know if it was a problem with the author's ability or lack of experience. Anyway, I didn't like it. I hope the author has a lot of room for improvement😡😡😡

What are your plans to automate 7 and {"TopicId":"597116312094900224","TopicName":"The First Anniversary of Zuodao Qingtian"}, just play with it, girl.

😰😰😰😰

Should a teacher only teach talented people with potential? From this, we can see that our education really has a big problem. Growing up, there were a few parents and teachers who would tell their children that it didn't matter if they couldn't go to college, and it didn't matter if they didn't make a lot of money. I just wanted you to be safe and healthy. Some children don't have that talent from the beginning. Every time they fail in a test, those who can comfort them usually tell them that they are too obsessed with playing games because they don't work hard. When we fail, what we want most is to be comforted, not by our loved ones or those around us who keep saying you are a waste, why don't you work hard and make progress? Obviously there are many paths in life, why do everyone chase the path that belongs to others? In a mediocre life, only you know whether the shoes fit your feet or not. You know whether your life is good or not. This does not mean that people should not work hard to make progress.

This book is enjoyable, but it also has many flaws. First, the protagonist is set as a support teacher, but his work is too utilitarian. It's not that the protagonist is wrong, but the volunteer teachers have always shown the public that they are not afraid of hardship or tiredness, and they are determined to let the children in the mountains walk out of the mountains and have a bright future like the children in the city. It can be said that they are self-sacrificing. This is why when we mention rural volunteer teachers, we are in awe. However, the protagonist only teaches geniuses, and there are differences and conflicts between the utilitarian nature of teaching and the public image of supporting teachers. I think this is one of the reasons why many readers leave comments in the comments. Second, is talent innate and immutable in genes, or can it change with factors such as environment, education, interaction with people, etc.? The former has a tone of blood theory, while the latter is a struggle against fate. This is also the focus of debate among readers, and it is also the unavoidable tone of this book. Everyone who has read the book knows the difference between the theory of innate blood and the theory of acquired struggle, so I won't go into details. The biggest drawbacks are these two. Everyone will have a sense of empathy when reading a book. People who have been severely beaten by society should know whether they are geniuses or ordinary people. This sense of empathy is really embarrassing and somewhat uncomfortable. Note: (Write about the difference between modern times and others such as fantasy. If you can really cultivate immortality, who would think that you are worse than others? Everyone is very confident, but the reality is different. Real life reminds you all the time, you are not good, you are just an ordinary person, not a genius, no Fantasy. ) I know that there are some irritable old men who will say, "Reading an online article, there is so much bullshit, it's so satisfying." I can only say, I'm sorry, if I read too many books, I can't help but think about its rationality within the framework set by the novel. At the same time, between the lines of the novel, this is also the communication between the imagination and thinking between the reader and the author. I can't just enjoy it without trying to think and understand the author's ideas for writing novels. The tone of the novel can be set by the author, but the logic must be coherent. For example, the Lord of Mysteries is a typical example. Finally, I hope the author will write better and better.

You can teach students in accordance with their aptitude, but the prerequisite is that there is no discrimination. If the protagonist is a teacher from a key high school, I don't think there is anything wrong with pinching the point. However, the evaluation of volunteer teaching should not be based on how many Qingbei teachers have been taught, but how many children have been brought out of the mountains. Maybe ordinary children can only go to high school, and the better ones can go to ordinary universities, but they also have a brighter future. Even if you don't go out of the mountains, it is a good thing and meaningful for your children to learn more. If the purpose of this system is just to cultivate more geniuses, then there is absolutely no point in supporting teaching in mountainous areas. You can directly pinch tens of thousands of people in key high schools every year.

Support teachers refer to people who go to poor areas to support education and help poor areas get rid of illiteracy. This is why we admire them, especially female teachers. Who doesn't want to live a good life in the city, but some of them are willing to support them for their hometown and their ideals. Some are even just passionate love at the beginning, for utilitarian reasons such as gold plating, but we cannot deny them (her), and even welcome them (her). When my dad was in school, he had to help the teacher's family farm. Getting back to business, let me talk about the protagonist. Is the protagonist just trying to educate geniuses? Then what's the point of the protagonist going to teach? Sage Confucius said: There is no distinction in teaching, teach students in accordance with their aptitude. The purpose of volunteer education is to help the next generation get rid of poverty. A genius, even if he is illiterate, has a flexible mind that ordinary people can use. The protagonist only teaches geniuses and not other students. This will only make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Is this the purpose of national education support? I am born with talents that will be useful. I can think of Boai's supporting teacher as a mediocre student. His statistics are not outstanding, and he is even stupid. He is unqualified at the highest level, but the teachers can teach them a skill. I can think of a great teaching teacher as a teacher who treats everyone equally, and should cultivate geniuses, but also teach other students how to behave. What I can think of about the lovely volunteer teachers is that when they were transferred out at the end of their term, the villagers walked in and saw them off. Maybe they are not the best teachers, but they are the greatest people. Instead of the protagonist being a genius all over the world, when they graduate and achieve great success, the protagonist is a so-called famous teacher who has many friends and friends, and no one comes and goes! And the one left by the protagonist, a student from a school, was working in the wind and rain on the construction site and in the fields. During the break, they were talking about what awesome students so-and-so taught, so-and-so was my schoolmate... Maybe, they would say, what would have happened if so-and-so had taught us? If the protagonist knew what they said, he would definitely say in his heart: Haha! Scumbag!

No matter how powerful the training is, it has nothing to do with how much money the protagonist has. It has nothing to do with the protagonist if he wants to go to middle school, high school, or college. Besides, the protagonist is so good that he still works as a support teacher 🤭

There is an essential difference between teaching and volunteer teaching. Teaching is a job. Volunteer teaching supports education in poor areas. Poor students and bad children will receive more care. My uncle's personal experience is that even the tuition fees are paid for. Therefore, volunteer teaching is not only a job, but also a kind of responsibility and a kind of dedication. My grandfather's generation and my parents' generation gave it to me. People have said that those who become volunteer teachers have determination, perseverance, and perseverance. Because of the environment and treatment issues, many people do not have that determination, which means giving up room for advancement, and being a volunteer teacher often lasts a lifetime. Therefore, my parents' generation still respects those elderly people who serve as volunteer teachers, but today's teachers don't even think about it.

After reading many of your comments, I roughly understand why so many people are so violent. This is because teaching as a volunteer teacher is a very sacred profession. Teaching as a volunteer is a spontaneous behavior that is not motivated by the desire to make a backward place rich. They go there so that everyone in a backward place can have enough food and clothing and make the whole village rich. It sounds like a lofty ideal, but many people are disgusted that Pig's Knuckle only pays attention to geniuses and not ordinary people. Ordinary people have many talents that have not been studied, but they can have many other talents. To get rich by raising pigs and fish, it depends on whether someone can guide them. Do you rely on mountains to eat mountains, and rely on water to drink water? Have you noticed this, Pig Jiao? Just favoring geniuses and academic performance. Is supporting education just for academic performance? Is it so that no one can discover geniuses in backward areas? It is to allow them to become independent and make a fortune on their own.

The protagonist is not suitable for teaching. First of all, geniuses are all over the place, and secondly, you can't teach guerrilla warfare by changing positions in one shot, staying in one place for a year or two. You will only have 50 students in your life. If you don't care about it, retreat.

This system is not suitable for supporting education. It is suitable for the protagonist. His father is the director of a high-end private education group, and Zhujie is the director of the admissions office and an instructor of an elite society.

After reading the introduction, I want to complain. The purpose of volunteer education is to give children in remote mountainous areas the opportunity to read and learn as much knowledge as possible, and to get rid of ignorance. If you set up a system to find talented people and recruit disciples as a support teacher, I am afraid it is a bit withdrawn. I don't know if you write about an educational institution as a support education. Don't you want it to be popular? Or do you want to use some words?

The author's idea is correct, but with the title of supporting teacher, it is easy for people to have a fixed impression on him. As a support teacher, you can teach mediocrely, but if you have good moral character, this is the first impression in people's minds. The protagonist pursues seedlings with better potential. In the eyes of others in the book, he is a kind and capable teacher. But the purpose of supporting education: no matter whether the student is a genius or not, we must let him get the education he deserves. This is the good side of human nature. As for the protagonist's behavior, what we see is that he chooses children with high potential. For readers, this is equivalent to asking us to do "bad things" with the protagonist. Even if the results of his actions are good, for some readers, it is enough to be heartbreaking. Let me explain here, I am not here to criticize the author. Personally, I think the author's writing style is pretty good. If I had the golden finger of the protagonist, I would not give up using it even if I was scolded by people who knew me. Just thinking about teaching, the fixed impression made me a little awkward, so I ran from QQ reading to the starting point to complain. 😂

Writing this kind of novel is inherently good, but after reading dozens of chapters, I discovered the core question: What are the values ​​and spiritual outlook of this book? It's true that I am a rural person. You can check my hometown, Puli Township, Xuanwei City, Yunnan Province, and have a good understanding of how we children in the mountains go to school, and take a good look at what support education is and what integrity is! Please don't tarnish the word teacher, it is sacred.

I haven't read the book, but I've read a lot of book reviews and found that this book has been criticized a lot. Let me share my opinion. The more I read, the more I find that most readers want the protagonist to be a person with upright views, not someone who only has a utilitarian mind. The three views are correct as long as they conform to normal social morals. According to this book, normal social ethics require that teachers should not select students, teach them according to their aptitude, isn't it a normal requirement for teachers? Why are teachers like this not allowed to exist in novels now? There are always some readers who say what society is like, and it seems that they are out of touch with reality if it is not what they say. However, most readers like the protagonist who has three correct views. Is this wrong? Readers who say those things can think about it, would you really like someone with incorrect views?

I haven't watched it, but from the introduction, most of the students are female, so I know I shouldn't watch it.

This author is really not a good person. He is vicious from the beginning. Support education is not a place where you can swipe people with task cards. If you go to support education, other children are not human beings. They only focus on swiping their own tasks. It is simply a virgin.

I don't know why, but I really dislike He Qingqing

Basically 80% of those who graduate from Tsinghua University and study abroad will not return to their country, so the result of elite education is to provide talents for other countries to train. Are you teaching so many so-called geniuses just to be middle-class students in the future? The foundation of basic education in mountainous areas is to improve moral character and expand life direction choices. Performance and other things come second.

This novel can be said to be a teacher, but it really cannot be said to be a support teacher. It should be said that it lacks the consciousness of a support teacher!

Let's talk about why the author named this book in the first place. . . The introduction is very good, and the title of the book is also very good, but when put together, I don't want to read it at all. The protagonist is a good teacher, but not a good support teacher. Can anyone tell me if the content is about supporting teaching, or recruiting talented students from everywhere?

I ate 20 chapters today💩Retreat

Let's change the title of the book. What kind of support teaching? It's obviously a collection of geniuses.

To be honest, I'm done watching it. At the starting point, if you read the reviews and then read the book, you will not be able to read the book.

The author writes about supporting education for the sake of educational fairness. If a training class is held, only the children of high-ranking officials and businessmen can be developed. Can ordinary children be able to compete with those taught by the protagonist? Now you can still use exams to compare. The officials and middle-class disciples taught by the protagonist will all be better than you. Will the civilians still have a chance to succeed? This is hereditary, do you understand? You have only seen the first level, and the author is on the second level, but he can't even explain it, okay?

After reading a few chapters, the most poisonous point of this book is that Pig's feet are looking for geniuses everywhere.