The Tang Dynasty Invited a Man

Disappointment. Such a good foundation to write such a work. So impatient! If nothing else, from the beginning to the seizure of power, it was baffling to watch. There is also a lot of popular historical knowledge. This explanation is acceptable, but the problem is that it is too confusing.

I don't have any opinions or arguments of my own about history, so I copy and write dry notes on the Internet, and I like to fool around.

Is there really no science in the novel? Is it possible to just tell a story directly without knowing a little about the background and historical facts?

This book could be renamed "Popularization of Historical Materials of the Tang Dynasty". After reading more than 20 chapters, one-third is about popularizing history. Are you a history teacher?

It's not about whether the pig's trotter is called Zhang Jun or Zhang Zhi. It's very funny to watch. The author makes his head hurt watching it.

I gave up the book after seeing the three-three system. All military organizational structures are linked to weapons and equipment. The author is just enjoying himself.

The front is fine, but the middle and later stages give me a headache. Baibubaigubugu There is no need to include so much popular science in the middle Take two or three hundred chapters from Chang'an. Why do you need 10 million words to unify it?

It's not attractive at all. It feels like I found a history book and wrote it step by step.

Because I know the author of "The Seventies", I support it by subscribing and adding a monthly pass.

What celebrities are there at this time?

60

Can you please delete this comment section? Why is it so difficult to read other people's comments? ? ? ? ? ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Insights into worldly matters are knowledge, and understanding of human feelings are articles. To judge whether an article is good or bad, it depends on whether it is really wise or smart.

What's going on with the author? I haven't updated yet.