I'm Really Just a Keyboard Warrior

I haven't read this book, I'm just curious about the introduction. What does the introduction mean? Can't understand

Success is also set, failure is also set. This book is good and very thoughtful. The setting is novel. Combining science and metaphysics, I actually prefer this setting. After all, existence is reasonable, and the extraordinary either does not exist at all, or the extraordinary itself is a part of the world. Science is not just something we learn, but a methodology, a way to understand the world and make human progress. If metaphysics does exist, then metaphysics is also science. But again, the author obviously doesn't have a good grasp of the plot and throws away the settings too hastily. This seems very long-winded and too hard-core. The setting itself is a double-edged sword. What I think is a very cool setting may be illogical and unreasonable in the eyes of others! And we read for entertainment and recreation, not for class. Read the book for the plot, not the setting! The setting should be mixed with the plot, rather than the plot mixed with the setting. Especially when your settings are not particularly attractive and may even arouse some people's disgust, the more and denser the settings, the more worrying the future of the book will be.

In book reviews, you can be sarcastic, you can be hot, you can scold if you don't like it, but the only thing is, don't use bad words, follow the traffic rules when driving, and don't make it inappropriate for children. My son has been reading it, and as a father, I can only delete it in such a situation. I explain it first to avoid offending.

This author is so active😅 If you have time to reply to the readers, you might as well write a few more chapters. There is no need to care about the readers so much...

Everyone, there are a lot of keyboard warriors, it's in the introduction.

It's the holidays, and I would like to send the author a big holiday blessing! I wish your work will be great soon🔥! Happy Double Day! 😊😊

Compare some of the so-called amazing descriptions and settings in science fiction with those in traditional metaphysics to see what our ancestors' imaginations are like. Water drop - the cosmic detector made of strong interacting materials in "Three Body". Because its shape is similar to a water drop, it is called a water drop by humans. The surface will reflect almost all electromagnetic waves, is absolutely smooth, and has a temperature at absolute zero. It uses the overflowing strong interaction force to completely lock the atoms in mutual motion and produce extremely high-strength materials. The essence of the five innate elements - the mountain spirit is called Chi, the material spirit is called Mei, the earth spirit is called Sheep, the water spirit is called Wangxiang, the wood spirit is called Bi Fang, the fire spirit is called You Guang, and the gold spirit is called Qingming. Do you think they all come from "Journey to the West" or "The Romance of the Gods"? Wrong! It comes from the "Zhengbu Lun" recognized by Confucianism and was written by Wang Yi of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Although it has been lost, it is excerpted in "Taiping Yulan", "Yilin" and "Selected Works". Wang Yi also has a relatively famous book that has been handed down, called "Chu Ci Zhang Ju". Whether in Journey to the West it is said that the essence of Kantu Zhenyuan Daxian and the essence of Jiamu are the ginseng and fruit trees, or in The Romance of the Gods it is mentioned that Geng Jin is the precise Taoist priest, Li Huo is the essence of land pressure Taoist, or the essence of Kuishui is Gonggong, all come from the description in "Zhengbu Lun". If we regard what the ancients said as fabricated fantasy, then fantasy is far ahead of the West. In terms of science fiction, we have not been weak since ancient times. Lunheng, which has always been praised as a simple materialist philosophy, in the chapter about Japan: There are three-legged crows in Japan. By the way, Wang Chong, the ancient barbarian, supports the theory of square heaven and believes that the sky is flat, the earth is flat, and the sun is also flat. Haha, does it look like the round sky and square square theory of the Lighthouse Kingdom now? You can't read the bound edition of anything. If you just pick out one sentence, you must believe that Wang Chong in history or ideology is a simple materialist, because he said that people will not become ghosts after death, which is right! By the way, let's talk about "Taiping Yulan", which is a book on immortals in the Song Dynasty. It was compiled by the imperial court and compiled a genealogy of the immortal legends of the past dynasties. Therefore, why the gods and Buddhas in Fengshen and Journey to the West can gather in such groups is not because Wu Cheng'en and Xu Zhonglin have great imagination, but because they all have reference books. Is this an ancient encyclopedia? So, what we often call made-up fantasy (excluding the current situation of killing a sword from Nantianmen to the Hall of Hell) has a system and inheritance, classmates. Taking away the differences in language and characters, what do you think is the difference between the essence of Guishui and the drop of water? How different is the essence of Lihuo from nuclear fusion? The search engine is very convenient. Maybe you can also see the description of the temperature of Nanming Lihuo by the ancients.

For traditional Chinese medicine The theory of traditional Chinese medicine is the system of methods that the ancients tried to establish to treat the occurrence and treatment of diseases. The theory of meridians and the theory of the five internal organs and the five elements are all achievements. They were originally methods to try to explain disease phenomena. The theory of meridians involves part of the neurovascular knowledge, and the five internal organs are not the corresponding specific organs. It can be said that the theory of traditional Chinese medicine is inherently imperfect and is just a set of effective methods. It is useful, but do not deify it. It does have unreasonable and even imaginary parts, but overall it is a summary of human experience in exploring the world.

The crowd of experts was bombarded 😰 But this is the first time I have seen the author so active in the book review area The introduction is interesting, add it to your favorites and take a look We can chat when you are free in the future 😏

Although there are some things that I haven't seen yet and can't understand, I still feel that they are very powerful. 6666