I'm Really Not a Golden Lawyer

The writing style is very good, but the subject matter is not suitable. It is a reversal type, focusing on unexpectedness and immediacy, but this legal subject is about the clarification and judgment of past events. The addition of unexpectedness can only make the storyline uncomfortable.

This kind of anti-routine gameplay is a bit awkward for lawyers. As a lawyer, you have the responsibility to take the case. You cannot play the game and do whatever you want. Although you win in the end according to the setting, the protagonist's active role in the case is weakened. After reading the preface, I thought it was a pure lawyer's article. Although the system will be cheated, at least the protagonist will grow up and become more powerful to solve various difficult cases. But in the current setting, the protagonist actually wants to lose the lawsuit deliberately in order to make money. This is a bit of a bad character and makes people have a bad impression of the protagonist!

After reading a few chapters, the protagonist always wants to lose the lawsuit so that he can make money, and he has no bottom line in professional ethics. Have you ever thought about those people who go to court? If you are unlucky enough to meet someone who keeps losing lawsuits, who else would sue you? That system is useless? You cannot add skills to the protagonist.

First of all, there is the problem of the protagonist's mentality in the system at the beginning. Although the system's intention is to let the protagonist lose the lawsuit, normal people know that this is impossible. What the lawyer industry needs is reputation and case sources. If the original purpose is to lose the case, it is okay to say once or twice, but if the number of times is too many, you can refer to the situation of Lawyer Zhang. No one comes to him to do anything. He is a buy-two-get-one-free type that no one wants. The market's feedback is the most timely. If you lose the case, it is unreliable, and it will gradually become cold. Then there will be no cases for you at all, and even if there are, it will only be the kind of community problem that mediates conflicts. Normally speaking, it is impossible for the protagonist to value this system. It can only be said that it is a good thing to have a status, but it is okay not to have it, because according to normal people's logic, winning the case is the way to maximize interests. Compared with an undefeated lawyer who has won many battles and a passerby who has no idea where he came from, if it were you, who would you choose to represent you? To be precise, I think the existence of the system is a failure. Firstly, the author does not need to rely on the contrast of winning when he wants to lose the case to attract popularity. After reading the first few chapters, I thought of a word: Eastern imitation. The author does not have the writing power of the author of Mr. Pei's novel. He wants to rely on this kind of cleverness. Combining routines to attract others requires profound writing skills and a deep grasp of the article. At present, the author does not have this ability at all. Compared with this contrasting routine, I think it would be much more exciting to start with the traditional career life of a fledgling lawyer who dares to fight hard than this contrasting routine. Because at the starting point, this kind of novel is a relatively red line. At present, there are no novels with lawyers as the starting profession. Nowadays, people are becoming more and more interested in laws and regulations, just like Mr. Luo has become popular. It can be said that the author, your lawyer, is very creative. If you write it, you may become a great master, but the system contrast is really unnecessary. The second point is Insufficient motivation. The routines of the contrast system will have an awkward point in the middle and later stages. In the early stage, it can attract popularity because this routine is relatively niche and refreshing. However, in the middle and later stages, once the audience becomes familiar with it, there will be a sharp decline, because the routines have been written in the early stages, and they are all the same and no longer interesting. After the climax, there is no point in watching anymore. This problem also exists in the book Losing Money and Becoming the Richest Man. The author's solution is to update the system at 1:1000 and use lol to transfer the mentality of losing money to the fun part of the game. But what do you do? At present, I think you, the author, cannot handle this transition point (๑˙ー˙๑) well. Then The first case, first of all, the reason for not paying back the money is not established. The defendant's father can be said to have forgotten it, but the author, you can look at the sentences you used to describe the defendant's family situation. As a second generation who inherited millions, even if his father donated all the money, it would definitely leave a way out for his children. As the article says, he can already live by collecting rent. Moreover, the plaintiff's demand for litigation is 30,000 yuan. First of all, it is not a big amount. I think for a second generation, it is only 30,000 yuan. It is not 300,000 yuan. Just because my father owes someone 30,000 yuan, he went to court for it. To be honest, if I were that second generation, I would definitely give it. At least I think my time and sympathy are worth more than the 30,000 yuan. This situation is usually resolved in the mediation stage. The second more obvious flaw is that the author is afraid that you have forgotten the process of civil litigation. He does not mean that you can file a lawsuit just by finding a lawyer. Your time span is not sorted out. I will not spoil the details. The author can change it appropriately. The specific big problems are these two points. Secondly, the small problems such as the rationality of the characters' psychology are up to the author to slowly change. Read it several times and examine it as a reader. There are still many problems with the article. In addition, the author needs to sort out your outline. The main theme of the first few chapters is unclear, and it reads like a running account. I haven't read the rest of it yet. I can only say that your writing skills are still a long way to go‎|•'-'•)و✧

Attorney Zhang(ಡωಡ)

That, um, should be on shelves this Friday. Book friends who keep books, please support me. Otherwise, it will be easy to die quietly... After all, it is easy to die without nourishment. Cute new saplings please support 😭😭😭

I just read the first chapter, and I don't quite understand why commission fees are not allowed. Although the system will reward you, you have to collect what you should collect, otherwise it feels a bit strange.

Author, hurry up and write. I'll leave it at that. I'll order all of them as soon as it's put on the shelves.

What is the meaning of the existence of the system?

I probably understand that the protagonist is going to lose, and then I write about winning. The cool thing would be to take the initiative to help disadvantaged groups in their lawsuits, lose the game and then win. It has to be that kind of counter-routine. After watching the first lawsuit, you will understand that the system is an intelligence-reducing system. Control the target to explode the mine yourself. As far as non-superpower urban writing is concerned, it is already so awesome. Why do people still say that the system is not powerful?

After reading through the comments, I feel that due to various coincidences, this kind of counter-routine is making more money and becoming more and more famous. If it is because the system stipulates that you must lose, and the protagonist takes a case that looks like he will lose, but wins in the end, then after taking this kind of case, wouldn't you think about changing to a different type of case? For example, in a divorce case, their purpose is to transfer property and then start fighting each other. How to calculate this kind of case? I think so! If the protagonist really wants to lose, he can go to prison and overturn the case for them. Even if there are injustices, there are only a few, very small. However, even if you pick up a few and all lose, it is a question whether those people will let the protagonist pick up. Really, if the system stipulates that you must lose, there must be a way. Why doesn't the protagonist do it? You can't even collect money. Why should the protagonist listen to the system? It's better to have regulations that don't charge money if you win, but you have to charge money if you lose. It's like the loser collects money. There must be evidence during the investigation. I have several impressive cases in another lawyer novel. A case of insurance fraud, a couple, the wife went home at a normal pace, and the husband called the police the next day, saying that the wife had disappeared. After the police came, they found a finger in the kitchen pipe. The police suspected that the wife had been murdered because the blood stains on the scene were large. According to common sense, the insurance company had to pay, but the company He said that he could not confirm that his wife was dead because the body was not found. Later, the police gave a death certificate. Then, a few days later, the wife came back. Later, when the husband died, another sum of money had to be paid to the wife. Then the couple really died, and all the money was transferred to the uncle who was far away overseas, so he said that he had to pay three times. What I wrote is relatively simple and may not be complete, but the final result is this. The other is that originally a rich man had a lover, and everyone in the family knew it. In the end, the rich man died, but the suicide note disappeared, because the rich man would rewrite it every few days. In the end, the lover won, and the lover invited the lawyer and her family to visit, saying that she only wanted that part of her. After arriving home, the lover tied up the lawyer, lined up her family, and asked him how he could get all the inheritance by killing her children. After killing the rich man's family, he then committed suicide. There are several more cases that I don't want to talk about anymore. I just don't know what the system's definition of losing is. It's a win on the surface, but for the person involved, it's a loss and work. In fact, we lost but we won, so what standard does the system follow? I think so! Just a personal thought. The system can give the protagonist a case, which can be a sure loss, but the system clearly tells the protagonist that there is someone behind it and rewards the protagonist according to the progress of the investigation. I read a lot of novels now. I used to be able to read them no matter how they were written. Now when I look at the title of the book, I wonder what the flaws are, and then the introduction. Obviously, it didn't matter before, but now it doesn't. Maybe it's because the world view of the novel has been improved!

My biggest impression of lawyers comes from Ace Attorney... That was the earliest lawyer I ever saw

The introduction of your book is very Mr. Pei... Too Pei

Do you have any recommendations for novels in the lawyer genre that are not systemic poisonous?

Why did the number of votes on the interface not change even though I voted for recommendation?

If you do something righteous and go against comedy routines, you won't get what you want and you won't be able to laugh.

Are you on leave now or something like that? It seems I haven't seen the update

There is no eunuch, the author is busy closing the project

What about today's six o'clock update? 😥

After reading the first two chapters, I felt I didn't like it a bit, but I ordered it for the first time and it was okay.

? Why don't you follow the new ones? I was raised to death after just a few days 😰

I finally know how those legal aids that went to death and blackmailed me came from! You were the one who helped prosecute me for stealing a battery, right? You were the one who helped sue me for stealing fruits and falling to death! You were the one who filed the lawsuit for the car accident while stealing the watermelon, right? Is it you who helped us sue for eating narcissus as leeks? You are the one who helped me sue for smoking in the elevator! Too many to be too lazy to say

I like this book, it's very good, why don't I write it again?

While reading, please vote for me.

It looks good, and I don't hate Gold Finger either.

I don't know how the author plans to write about this case. If he still thinks that it was successful before, his reputation will be ruined. If it fails and it doesn't meet the content, we can only find a compromise.

I am participating in the Qidian [Vote for Online Literary God-level Famous Scenes] event. The original text of the famous scene I submitted is as follows. Come and discuss it with me! "Mr. Zhang, please come in." {"LinkId":"883432641","LinkName":"515 Book Fan Festival-Famous Scene Voting","LinkUrl":"QDReader://ataru. Qidian. Com/noah/883432641?_Viewmode=1&nocenter=2&f=tg"}

Well, this book is very controversial. I'm curious to take a look. How is the protagonist's outlook on life now?

Let me talk about the shortcomings first. The system is too useless in the early stage. The novel is more exciting... It is difficult to get. I suggest that the criminal case should be more exciting. The first criminal case... It is really anticlimactic. It is not fun before it is over. The advantages are neither embarrassing nor poisonous, which is rare. Who knows those books with good scores, but I was poisoned after reading a few chapters. This is also the first time I read a lawyer's article. It is not bad. Good luck to the author.

I have read some very good novels, and I feel that the author writes them very professionally. It's just that the language is too bland, and there are no plot twists during the trial defense. It's like spreading out the files and laying out the legal provisions and explaining the situation again and again. There is no sense of widening the gap between the abilities of the protagonist and other lawyers.       ，，360， It is recommended that there be fewer cases that are too controversial. After all, although the protagonist is a system that wants to lose, the setting is that the protagonist will only win in the end. If the case is too sensitive, the ending will only favor one side in the book, which will drive away many readers from the other side. Finally, I wish the author better and better books and great achievements.