Love Above the Clouds

This introduction... I feel so sad.

This is not a book recommendation review, nor is it a negative review. It is just a review from a person who likes physical mystery novels. The author is the author of several completed books. "Yun Yeyao's Reasoning" is said to be a sequel to the author's previous works. I have not read the author's previous works, so I have no idea about the author's writing techniques and style. But while watching it, some scenes made me uncomfortable (in various senses). The first case title of the work: The Transformation of Lucifer The protagonists of the work are: the actor who is a genius detective, the forensic doctor who suspects the actor's amnesia twins, and the criminal police officer who takes on the role of force (note: all three are male) At the beginning, the author gives the process of the three people being invited to participate in the horror party, interspersed with a lot of suggestive words to guide the readers' thinking, making people think that Mrs. Lucifer who leads the way is problematic, and may even be the murderer. This routine operation is used to mislead some newcomers. In the introduction of the suspects and the performance of the protagonists when the murder occurred, they were quite satisfactory. Then, the author begins to give all kinds of messy information and clues to the detective. This is the most interesting part of mystery novels. The author gives useful or useless clues, allowing the detective and the reader to reason about the case at the same level. This is not just a showdown between the murderer and the detective, but also a challenge from the author to the reader. See if you can find out the truth first or just accept the result of failure. The author will show you off one by one what you didn't expect. However, this is also where I started to feel uncomfortable. Brain-burning reasoning has turned into brain-burning reasoning. The author set up three protagonists, and then used events to separate them to act separately. He used a group portrait method, which is quite good. However, the author's writing style began to become gay. Although there were some inexplicable descriptions such as "the actor's tears fell down", he began to let himself go later. When I felt that the clues began to connect and become clear, it was also about halfway through the first case chapter. This was also the time for the final confrontation between me and the author, because in the subsequent series of dazzling operations by the author, I gave up thinking. (What I guess is, 'The dead Yujin is really himself?' 'Hujia, fake beard?' 'Mr. Lucifer really exists?' 'Mrs. Lucifer is definitely not the murderer' 'There is more than one murderer' 'The other maid is Mrs. Lucifer pretending to be'...) First of all, the three protagonists still had their mobile phones. After sending messages to the outside world, the entire case spanned only one day and one night. They were able to investigate Mrs. Lucifer's identity before plastic surgery and also found a bunch of clues about the murderer. The speed of the outside police investigation was incredible... (I have not read the author's previous work. (I don't know if this is the author's usual practice in previous books) and the author didn't give the readers even the slightest clues about the clues he investigated, which completely broke the balance between the number of clues between readers and detectives. I was still trying to piece together a puzzle with a third missing. Then the worst murderer among them died not long after it started. I read that right! This is the conclusion reached by the forensic doctor. As a professional, the protagonist said that she was dead, so naturally I would not consider her as the remaining murderer. I kept thinking about who the last person hidden in this villa was. But when I looked back, I realized that she was actually fake death! Do you want to learn about bloody TV dramas? A forensic doctor who specializes in examining the dead? A professional? Did you go in to examine the murderer's body when they were separated? In fact, you knew she was not dead? Another clue to inequality? There is not even a bit of relevant information. The forensic doctor said from the beginning that she was dead. What a joke! What is this? When I wrote the last few chapters to summarize the reasoning, my whole brain was trembling. Your introduction clearly stated that this is a novel based on the style of fictional reasoning. Did you say that true reasoning focuses on fairness and rational logic? What does it mean if useful clues are only in the hands of the author? After reading this case, I didn't want to continue reading. I also took a look at the comment area, and actually saw the words "delicate emotions". What I saw was that the detective dumped his girlfriend for the actor... There were nearly two hundred comments without any discussion on the logic and rationality of the case. Do they really like mystery novels? In general, this novel made my brain hurt after reading it. For those who like to make their own reasoning when reading mystery novels, it is still good if they only read the first part of the case. If you want to continue, unless you are really used to the author's unequal amount of clues or you want to give up thinking.

Dear writer, your new book is very good. I have joined the new book investment group. Please update~

After writing so much, you didn't sign a contract?

Add a bookshelf and read slowly 😊

The introduction has already introduced the whole story, what else are you reading? I know the beginning, process and ending clearly 😅