
Who Has Written History in Five Thousand Years?
五千年来谁著史
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 1.6M Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Alternate History
- Updated
- 4y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Synopsis
609Chapters
0Votes
65.9kRecs
41.3kFans
More by this author
Readers also read
I Was About to Rebel, but Li Shimin Draped a Yellow Robe Over Me
The Dawn of Chongzhen, 1627
I Transmigrated as Cao Zhang: Seizing Zhen Mi to Win the Succession
In the Story of the Red Chamber, I Witness Lu Zhishen Uproot a Willow Tree
Since the Founding of the Camp: Chronicles of the Roman Khanate
A Plan to Revive the Northern Song
The Sun and Moon Endure Forever
Opposing the Qing: Starting by Abducting Shi Dakai!
Cleansing the Demons
Invincible Zhengde
I Found a Book of the Three Kingdoms
Striving in the Last Years of Hongwu
The Han Songs of the Boundless Wind
The Valiant General of the Three Kingdoms
Late Ming: I’m Rich, What Do I Have to Fear?
The Age of Prosperity
The Gaming World of Another Realm
Reader comments 41
Translated by Google Translate
For five thousand years, no one dared to cook shit!
I would like to discuss with the author the issue of the protagonist's presence. In my opinion, the plot of a novel must have a protagonist as the core and rely on the protagonist to promote and develop the story. The reader is immersed in the story by taking the role of the protagonist. If a story is not driven by the protagonist or has nothing to do with the protagonist, how can the reader be involved? The presence of the protagonist in this book is gradually becoming weaker. At the beginning, the protagonist is the core in promoting the plot. After twenty or thirty chapters, the protagonist often disappears in three or five chapters. What about the officials in the capital? How is the war situation in Jinzhou? What is Zheng Sen doing? The author seems to be telling the story seriously and seems to be enriching the levels and details of the story. But the problem is that without the protagonist, where will the reader take the story? What does a plot that cannot be substituted and participated have to do with readers? If I want to know the details of history, why don't I read a history book? In other words, in my opinion, a novel without a protagonist and a story that lacks a sense of substitution has no value at all. The author's protagonist has less and less presence in the story, and the story is less and less dependent on the protagonist for the occurrence and development of the story. Now it has developed to the point where the protagonist is missing from seven or eight pictures, completely becoming an explanatory text of the author's fictional history. I don't want to emphasize whether there is any problem with the writing method that the author thinks, but the writing method of missing the protagonist is really very problematic. I suggest the author think about it carefully.
Either don't write about Zheng Zhilong or start writing before Zheng Zhilong's rise, so as to have a more sense of substitution and accomplishment. What's the point of suddenly traveling through time and becoming Zheng Zhilong, who is already the most powerful pirate in East Asia? Isn't it embarrassing to have a cheap teenage son?
The next time Xiang Yu, the overlord of Western Chu, could cross the Chengwu River and commit suicide, he made trouble when the people were convinced that the situation was over.
Another victim of a mythical beast. Now in the late Ming and early Qing Dynasties, the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China were like sinkholes, and you would die if you touched them. I, the Bureau of Waste Management, have done a great job in publishing sentences, and they have spared no effort in eradicating our Chinese culture.
If you travel through time and become the richest man in the Ming Dynasty, you can show off your wealth to Chongzhen 🤭 Let this poor guy see what it means to be a rich man
Who can tell clearly about history? The Qing Dynasty destroyed the country but was not cleaned up. The "History of the Qing Dynasty" written later was all about the Manchu Qing. The massacre was briefly mentioned, and the writing style of the Spring and Autumn Period fully demonstrated the historian's full power to kneel down. And "History of the Ming Dynasty" needless to say, what is it called? There is another Ming Dynasty case surrounding the history of the Ming Dynasty. The whistleblower Zha Jizuo's family was promoted to an official position, with more than ten Jinshi, but there are many people outside.
You must not be unclear about some issues (Add Jinghu)
I want to say something to refute that Yuchen Daojun's argument that all feudal dynasties are bad and all bad, but it's actually historical nihilism, alas.
This book is useless. A modern person, who knows the direction of history, can predict it in advance. He has hundreds of thousands of people, tens of millions of silver, and still has several years to prepare. He actually wants to play some tricks to support Chongzhen. It is embarrassing and the Han Dynasty is still majestic. How funny.
Change your introduction! Join the protagonist and become Zheng Zhilong through the Ming Dynasty. It would be great to travel through the time of the Ming Dynasty, the age of the protagonist Zheng Zhilong, his aspirations, etc.!