Godfather of Rock

I watched 53.7% Of the movie. The plot is too weak and I don't want to watch the rest. Write a book review. Only 30% of the content in this book has a plot, such as starting a record company, "Rock Bible", being an MJ, "American Idol", and NewsFeed. And 50% of the content is promoted by copying songs, including recording, releasing albums, touring, celebrating parties, drinking and having sex with women. There is basically no change in these contents from the beginning to the middle. For example, this song is easy to record and that song is difficult to record. The tour is about singing whatever you want and where the fans are enthusiastic. Plus this band is awesome and this album is awesome. They are all about introducing rock music and basically have no plot. The remaining 20% ​​are complaints about how dark "North America" ​​is, complaints about the IRS, "what is different from the country on the other side of the ocean...", And "indescribable mythical beasts". Basically, there is a set every few chapters, which makes me tired of reading it. Although "the country on the other side of the ocean" appears frequently, the main and supporting characters in this book are all white. In the impression, the Chinese only have a Chinese waiter and a chef. Probably because the protagonist band are all blatantly racist, and the good guys are all black. Ghost, cancer, if you name a Chinese, is that discrimination or not? If there is no discrimination, readers won't believe it either. The author is really negative about MJ. The free chapter first protects MJ fans from lightning, and by the middle of the book, he has teamed up with Sony to kill MJ and share his property. Even if I am not an MJ fan, I still feel that the emotions are too strong. How could there be such hatred? Finally, I have to say that the plot is too weak. The first half of the book basically relied on the rock bible to hang on. Later, MJ was still hanging on when his identity was exposed. After MJ died, the plot stopped. I'm not at all curious about what's behind, and I can't even watch it if I force myself to do so. The original intention of reading this book was to learn about rock and roll. It did the job. It is a popular science book, but the price/performance ratio is a bit low.

The book is a bit too dry around the 5-600 mark. Roger is completely suppressed by an unknown sense of anxiety in the back. The book does not have the freedom and open-minded spirit of rock and roll at all. After all, the bishop is a character who loves rock and roll and can live out his own personality! Although he is a copycat, look at what the bishop did later. The European tour was written so-so, but I wanted to invest in it. When it was effective, I sold it. After selling it, I invested it all in records. I don't know, does it have a little bit of rock and roll charm? If you can't write about the corruption of the rock circle, you can write about Bishop's travels, anonymous bar performances, whatever? It's okay to have a little bit of the daily life of a musician! Is the bishop's love for music entirely left to the reader's imagination? The second half of the article is all about that investment. The reasons are anxiety and safety? You are worried that you will not diversify your investments. Whatever you invest in, it all comes back to records. You invest in records for both profit and influence. What the hell is investing in records through all channels? Can that marginal benefit be matched by the revival of nostalgic entities? Bishop's current character is almost as dry as a piece of paper, so just stick around the record company to flesh out his character! Add some concert stuff and niche themes to live up to the name.

After reading some time travel articles, I finally got to go abroad once. In addition, rock knowledge has spread a lot, so the story seems a little loose. Overall, it's pretty good. After all, it's not easy to write something like this well.

Michael Jackson really boasted too much. I don't deny that Michael's works are very good, but they are really popular in China. Michael Jackson was great but not as great as the media made him out to be. As a post-1995 generation, I didn't know there was such a person in the world until after his death, and most of the people around me were the same as me.

To reorganize a band, we should look for good bass and keyboards. I don't understand why we have to set pig's feet to talk about bass, the band member with the least presence. Although it is very important, I think the author has fallen into a blind spot. In fact, keyboard or guitar alone can perfectly perform a song. Bass and drums are background and rhythm. Maybe the author likes bass. This is a bit willful and is not a good thing for the popularity of the book.

I particularly like the genre, but the commercial atmosphere is too strong. Every chapter in the book is related to money, bands, and song introductions! The article feels very boring. Without some entertainment, it feels like it will always be cloudy without a ray of sunshine! ❤️❤️❤️

Come on, it's really rare to write about rock music!

If you don't like rock music, you don't look like a human being if you take drugs and have sex.

The black mj was bleached when I first came up,,,, I was a little speechless.

Basically, they are all niche songs, and the ones that are widely circulated are all given away, which is interesting 🤫😡

The protagonist attaches great importance to his commercial value, but also always likes to choose some unpopular songs, which feels very contradictory.

The author, emmm, seems to be someone like Wang Feng. The title of the book is rock, and the songs copied are rock, but the rest are not rock at all.

After reading the public version, I would like to make some comments to the author. This novel is too dry. Half of one chapter is an expository text. The story is really poor, and the author's positioning is unclear. Everyone who likes rock music basically knows this information, but not many people who don't like rock music or just listen to music will not be able to read it, and it will not please both sides.

I'm also drunk when I write a book about rock music without women.

This book was written by the author to show off for his own pleasure, and was not written for readers at all. Is the niche great? Is it nice to have a high status brother? Listening to a bad song makes you feel that you have unique taste and are superior to others? Then why don't you just copy Chopin Bach? After all, in the chain of contempt, rock music is worthless in front of classical music. It's really both upright and upright.

The entire history of rock and roll, we are here to read the novel, not to watch your class. Your personal preferences are too obvious in the book, which makes me feel uncomfortable reading it, so goodbye.

The novel has no plot and is just popular science. . .

This book confused me as soon as it came out. The author copied a song and gave it a title. The lyrics were in Chinese. I was originally going to search for the song, but more than a dozen versions popped up. The key is that I still don't know which version the author wrote. I read this kind of entertainment text while listening to the song and reading the novel. But I couldn't find the song the author had written for a long time. Gone, everyone, see you in the world.

The author is the trumpet who writes about Meiyu's "White Thirteen" (I don't know if I remember correctly)? The similarities between the two are as follows: 1. Both have detailed information and high accuracy of information. Of course, this is generally an advantage. 2. The protagonists have no emotions. Although there is a lot of ink when describing the characters and the writing is not bad, under such circumstances, it can still make people feel that the protagonists have no emotions, and even feel like they are just a shell. I have only seen "White Thirteen", and the style is infinitely similar. 3. There is no need to explain many things or even general rules, but the two authors are very persistent and take the trouble every time there is such a need. Typical example: Interest comes first, does this need to be mentioned at every turn? Hasn't this been the case since the beginning of mankind? 4. Not too convincing reason: White is opposite to black, but in some ways they are similar - both are extremes. And it's normal to name a trumpet so that you can't bear to leave the big one. It's too similar and inappropriate. Naming it the opposite is also a hidden connection.

Is there anything cool about this book? After reading more than 20 chapters, I found that if I don't fall in love, I can't make money, and my future is not bright, I just feel oppressed in various ways. It's reasonable, but I'm cheated by my manager, and I'm cheated by the company. I formed a band and it was assumed that I would be a little transparent in the band. In addition, the songs don't have a strong sense of substitution (at least they're not as strong as Chinese songs, and not many people can sing). Is this reading a novel?

There are really too few rock articles, and this one is good. There's nothing very toxic, and the writing is pretty good. What is lacking is recommendation channels. Maybe rock music is too niche. I think this book can be compared with the book about a reborn mixed-race black guy rapping.

It is full of a lot of science popularization and descriptions. In fact, there is no need to be so detailed. Two chapters and three science popularizations are very boring, and after a lot of science popularization, the plot is also lackluster and very dull. I really don't feel anything when I look at it. It is just watery and popular science (personal opinion)

What should I say, after reading the beginning, I was deliberately made unhappy. Since the bassist is a marginal figure, why was it set to be the bass? You are already playing Yao Gun, and you also specially set up a marginal character to start the game deliberately like a loser?

It's too toxic, the setting is too inconsistent, an autistic 15-year-old boy from a low-income family who inherited a million-dollar inheritance and went to an aristocratic private middle school knows how to take drugs, pick up girls and drive, and also likes rock music. It's so rubbish.

It is impossible for a bass player to give birth to a superstar in the broad sense, that is, it is too niche. You may be a superstar as a bass player, but the audience will always recognize you as a guitarist.

Oh my god, Adele's first album "19" has received very good reviews and sales. She won the Grammy Award for "Best Female Pop Vocalist" for "Chasing Pavements" and was nominated for Song of the Year. The reason why it seems to people is that it is not so impressive compared to the incredible sales of the second album "21" and its sweeping Grammys. Driven by "21", it achieved a huge increase in sales. If the author doesn't know anything about pop, country, etc., Then he should research it carefully, and he'll just pick up the drama based on hearsay. I accept the setting of a parallel world for the convenience of copying songs, and I tolerate the messy setting of some companies and products, film and television works and movie stars that exist or do not exist in order to expand the business territory and disrupt the world line. However, it is really shameful to get Adele and Taylor Swift to squeeze their value but only half-understand their stardom.

The whole article is about copyright money, and the songs chosen exclude popularity. However, the artistry of the music itself and the touching aspect it brings to the audience are rarely described. The highlight of the Grammys may also be mentioned in a few strokes due to the lack of characters in the parallel world, and there is no unique storytelling and refreshing feeling in music articles.

Caucasians can't replace them, they've already written online novels, and Chinese people can't crush them if they carry a library of otherworldly music.

Rory! Author, what are you writing about? It's too watery! Retired! ! ! !

Many of the band's classics were not selected (such as The Beatles' "let it be, here comes the sun, etc.") Because NetEase Cloud did not have copyrights and could not be included in the playlist. This reason made me laugh😬