Crazy Left Back

Supervision is also possible, human nature is evil, and although Lippi has a very professional ethics, he is not a saint. But the question is whether a professional supervision report can be made! Personally, I think that professional supervision reports should be extremely detailed, from the coach's guidance ideas, to team management, to on-the-spot employment! At the same time, the evaluation indicators given in the report should be objective and properly scrutinized (for example: the coach's tactics cannot simply be said to be "tactically conservative", because conservative is too general and does not take into account the opponent's situation, the technical strength of the players, etc. This kind of conservative evaluation can only be used for news reports, but not for professional supervision reports)! This means that the so-called supervisors will not interfere with Lippi's management and employment. They will just "watch eagerly" from the sidelines, record all the details, and then compile them into books, classify them into categories, and give convincing reasons! Then publish this report to the public so that we can understand exactly what went wrong! But it is a pity that various reports in China are very unprofessional (except for engineering reports). The reports are very comprehensive, but they are superficial and not detailed enough! On the contrary, FIFA's report runs to thousands of pages, and its professionalism and detail are staggering! Why is it not detailed enough? Not professional enough? Because the main job of the Football Association is to hold meetings, not to carry out real football construction work, there is nothing to write, so it is not professional enough!