Library
Browse and search novels
2 novels found

陕西新时期文学访谈及研究
Tai Kexiang
This book selects four topics of Shaanxi's new era literature from 1979 to 2019, namely, the beginning and end of the activities of the "Bi Geng Literature Group", the occurrence and significance of the "Shaanxi Army's Eastern Expedition", the origin and twists and turns of "Doctor's Direct Advice", and the rise of Shaanxi folk literature societies and publications. Through interviews with writers Chen Zhongshi, Jia Pingwa, Jingfu, Gao Jianqun, Feng Jiqi, Hong Ke, Wu Kejing and critics Liu Jianjun, Chang Guangyuan, Fei Bingxun, Xiao Yunru, Li Xing, Li Guoping, Xing Xiaoli, etc. Tried to construct a new description of literary history from the three-dimensional perspective of the oral accounts of the parties involved in historical events, archival data verification and objective examination by researchers.
This book selects four topics of Shaanxi's new era literature from 1979 to 2019, namely, the beginning and end of the activities of the "Bi Geng Literature Group", the occurrence and significance of the "Shaanxi Army's Eastern Expedition", the origin and twists and turns of "Doctor's Direct Advice", and the rise of Shaanxi folk literature societies and publications. Through interviews with writers Chen Zhongshi, Jia Pingwa, Jingfu, Gao Jianqun, Feng Jiqi, Hong Ke, Wu Kejing and critics Liu Jianjun, Chang Guangyuan, Fei Bingxun, Xiao Yunru, Li Xing, Li Guoping, Xing Xiaoli, etc. Tried to construct a new description of literary history from the three-dimensional perspective of the oral accounts of the parties involved in historical events, archival data verification and objective examination by researchers.

矫枉未必要过正
Tai Kexiang
Dr. Li Jianjun is a rising figure in the field of literary criticism in recent years. The article is written quickly and has sharp and sharp words, which is very popular among some radical critics. As a colleague, I have always admired his extraordinary courage, keen perception and breadth of knowledge, but I am a little dissatisfied with his criticism motivation and argumentation logic, especially his criticism strategy. In particular, his four comments on Jia Pingwa's works are even more disappointing and sad. Starting around 2000, we have seen four articles by Mr. Li Jianjun on "criticism" of Jia Pingwa in different publications, namely "Typical Texts of Negative Writing", "Private Form of Counter-Cultural Writing", "Randomly Fabricated Anti-True Writing", "Hastily Anti-modern Writing of Antiquity", etc.
Dr. Li Jianjun is a rising figure in the field of literary criticism in recent years. The article is written quickly and has sharp and sharp words, which is very popular among some radical critics. As a colleague, I have always admired his extraordinary courage, keen perception and breadth of knowledge, but I am a little dissatisfied with his criticism motivation and argumentation logic, especially his criticism strategy. In particular, his four comments on Jia Pingwa's works are even more disappointing and sad. Starting around 2000, we have seen four articles by Mr. Li Jianjun on "criticism" of Jia Pingwa in different publications, namely "Typical Texts of Negative Writing", "Private Form of Counter-Cultural Writing", "Randomly Fabricated Anti-True Writing", "Hastily Anti-modern Writing of Antiquity", etc.