Canopy/travel. It is precisely because the feudal monarchy has fallen that we can judge the ancients through entertainment, but there is no need to remember the emperors too sincerely.
Give it three stars for the main body, add one star for the extras, and deduct one point for hydrology.
As a short story about popularizing the law, it was okay. The proportion of ancient people featured was much more than in other stories. I quite enjoyed reading the heroine's daily life. However, there is a difference between official documents and defense parts, popular science sketches and hydrology. The author's degree is obviously not good enough.
The details in other aspects are not very good. It is the blind modern technology that shocked the ancients, which is a bit taken for granted. The ancients were not fools. The history of horizontal spoilers is also very deliberate. It is better to specialize in a legal field. It is unexpected that the spoilers are so popular and separated from the core creativity. Everyone is attracted to their own eyes.
In addition, this article rarely mentions Yuan and Qing in various dynasties, which is quite strange.
The roles of the male and female protagonists are evenly divided, but the female protagonist Wen Duanshui is not suitable for the feudal society, because the heroine has been trapped in the harem since her appearance. If the emperor does not come with the camera, the plot will not advance.
The setting is that the protagonist travels back in time to a novel written by someone else, so Concubine Hua adopts the image of a domineering villain.
The heroine really regards being a concubine as a profession. The emotional line that was briefly mentioned is diluted a lot by this staff atmosphere. The heroine does not regard the emperor as the same species.
The male protagonist feels the pity of the female protagonist, a completely positive image, and the oppression of feudal imperial power and patriarchy is hidden in the female protagonist's seemingly relaxed self-resolution, just like Jiang Heng actually doesn't like pomegranates. If you are very concerned about this, you can refer to the comments of the free chapter.
The introduction is the text, and the main line is to export the equality and anti-feudal views to the ancients. It is suspected that the teacher's lesson preparation materials are used for secondary purposes, but he is really giving a lecture. I prefer the lessons in modern literature that are inspired by the ancients, and when it comes to ancient texts, I always wonder what to do if the ones that have been handed down are inconsistent with the original texts. The role of the ancients was to use external barrages, choosing the most convenient stereotypes and brainwashing package writing methods. Although literature and history are not separated, it is obvious that no historical research was done.
Very interesting, please give me more. Mainly to make up for Song Ming's biggest shortcoming, the heroine's role is actually as mentioned at the beginning: the biggest role is to do nothing. It seems that some people mind this, but this is not a serious drama, so why pursue high value in a relaxed way. Don't read the commentaries on the first three chapters.
The writing style is very good, the commentary is pungent and humorous, and the subtleties have a touch of Spring and Autumn style. The audience's reaction basically focuses on the emperor, but there is also a narrative that enlightens the people's wisdom. I personally like the conclusion of each short chapter. The descriptions of several emperors are more convincing to me than other similar themes. There are no common stereotypes and it can be seen that there are careful research.
The focus is on getting along with Lao Zhu's family. The focus of the current series is on the various battles of the founding of the People's Republic of China. The dry content is too hard and it will be a bit boring. The last update was 800 years ago and it is still stuck.
Starting from the history of junior high school, the context is very clear. As a story about mutual understanding between the two sides, the interactive description is also very good. It rarely gives many characterizations to the common people, but there are too many stereotypes, especially the dragon, phoenix, pig, and the Han Wu statue. The heroine has a very good character, which can be said to be a display of hope and the future. As for the Spring and Autumn style of writing in our history books, it is better to read it in conjunction with Gao Zan's comments. Rather, it is the evaluation of these Spring and Autumn style of writing that has perfected the characters in both modern and ancient times.
It's quite good. It's very organized because it covers a small number of dynasties. It's a popular science article that's easy to understand and has no main thread. The evaluation of historical figures can be said to be different for each eye. Combined with the comment area, you can get a more pertinent evaluation.