People Should Be Responsible for Their Own Words and Deeds/use Them for Their Own Use
Collects
0
Books
22
Grade
Level C
Updated
1mo ago
In this incident, it is shown that there is no need to hinder the female sister. She has a bad mouth and is a close friend of such authors. Use rn vocabulary, etc., And the objective evaluation gradually increases.
Fei, the author from Jinjiang, added a new one after being exposed for his outrageous remarks last time (the previous remarks are listed later) and made the following remarks:
Fei Fee: Since every time I write an article, the heroine always spends my time, wasting my brain cells, torturing my nerves, and whoring the good men I created, I can't help but have the vicious black mud flowing in my heart, and want to give them some color, such as killing them or killing the person they love or killing them all...
Os: I feel very sad when I see a female author saying these things, and there are quite a few female writers who love men and hate women. . To put it bluntly, I hate it all the time because there is no such a top-notch man to be with it [laughing and crying] and I discovered that this was all from July 25, why did I only notice it now?? I posted it to prevent more people from being harmed.
The original words of Gua from before were released: (Fei from Jinjiang? I have an impression of this one. She also posted a blog post in which she was tolerant and pitiful for gay men who cheated on marriages and were oppressed by society and homosexuals. She said that they used their bodies as men to repay the world and repay their mothers)
The above prevents you from stepping on Lei Jia's entry.
I didn't expect that a person who writes about lily could actually say something like this (the following is the original words from the author's blog)
Winter Anatomy zZ
Published in Japan on 25-12-15 11:53
You idiot authors with pink eyes should go out for a few laps and stop writing all-female literature that only 0 people will read. In addition to serving as your gunmen, there are a few toilet girls who actually paid for it. Turns out there are 0 people there!
Publicly stand on the Jinjiang Platform + Danmei Circle, support Butterfly Spirit, and call opponents "obstructive/extreme"
3.29 A long post on Weibo supported Jinjiang, saying that the platform was "a clear stream for female authors to survive" and changed her destiny.
She scolded the reader in a private message: "Will a fujoshi give her a bwp?" This is misogyny and double standards. Subsequent updates were carried out normally, but without apology or cutting. It accused readers of "cyber-violating authors and damaging the platform ecology", stigmatizing rights protection, clearly siding with the platform, and uniting with Butterfly Spirit, Zhang Dingding and others. He claimed that he had been raped online by the "girl-obsessing group" but did not provide any solid evidence.
While reaping the benefits of female channel readers, they are supporting the platform + Danmei Circle that suppresses female channels. They are shouting for freedom of creation while stigmatizing readers' rights protection.
Overall writing style highlights (common to all articles)
Sweet pets have no brains, no love brain, no logic, the plot is suspended and unreal, and the main theme is silly, sweet, healing and non-torture. The characters are flat and labeled: the female protagonist is cute, cowardly, salty, and has a golden finger, while the male protagonist is overbearing, loyal, and paranoid. It has a great imagination and average writing. The setting of fast travel/metaphysics/immortal cultivation is interesting but not rigorous, with a running account and no climax. The ending is unfinished/hasty, with a lot of imagination in the early stage, but the plot collapses in the later stage and the ending is fast-forwarded. The female protagonist is a tool, and the female partner is mostly vicious and a tool, while the female protagonist is love-minded and devoid of growth.
4.1 I liked a blogger on Weibo who publicly criticized "obstructive women" (related to Butterfly Spirit). I responded by denying taking sides, denying the stance of liking, and claiming that I had been slandered, but did not directly clarify the behavior of the like.
Subsequently, he kept silent and pretended to be dead, did not respond to the controversy, and updated new posts as usual. While talking about "making a sweet love", he also liked misogynistic/stigmatizing remarks. After the controversy broke out, he did not respond, cut off, or apologize.
Die Zhiling firmly stood on the side and publicly scolded the opponents as "obstructive/extreme pornographic". Weibo launched a series of attacks, directly targeting female readers, with fierce and aggressive words. On the day of the 3.24 Ban, Weibo ridiculed readers who opposed the lock/ban: "Buying sanitary napkins is called free prostitution? Then you don't do this every day?" It directly stigmatized readers' rights protection as free prostitution.
Scolding the love-girl circle: "You are married, you are a married woman; you write romance, Edinburgh; you write about beauty, you love men and hate women. You have to scold your biological father for being unmarried and infertile in order to meet the requirements."
Accusing readers of "starting to talk about confrontation and personal attacks" and refusing to reflect
Personal attack taunts readers to "save some money to see a psychiatrist"
Calling opponents an "obstructive female group" that hinders creative freedom
We believe that Jinjiang's ban on women's frequent awakenings and the ban on "God's breasts" are reasonable and compliant
While shouting for creative freedom, he insults and labels opponents, labeling legal rights protection as "obstruction of women/free prostitution" and attacks female readers with degrading words such as "marriage donkey" and "Edinburgh". He secretly cannot hide his misogyny and defends men's rights. He openly criticizes and personally attacks them on Weibo, and looks ugly.
If you want to read a novel with strong emotions, interesting characters, rigorous logic, happy ending, and no misogyny, just avoid Zhang Dingding.
- The author himself is openly misogynistic, insulting female readers (Marriage Donkey, Edinburgh, etc.), Siding with Butterfly Spirit, and stigmatizing the love girl circle
??
- The implicit male dominance and female role in the text are tools; the romance line is about female rivalry and love brain; the Danmei line is about attacking the strong and the weak, and attacking the dominant one.
3.27 Butterfly Spirit immediately takes up the team after falling off the horse
Weibo issued a statement: "Hindering the female community is hindering creative freedom. Reporting blocked articles and online violence against authors must be resisted."
Join forces with Butterfly Spirit and Zhang Dingding to form a Danmei Writers Alliance
4.1 Publicly insulting female readers
Weibo ridiculed: "The circle of lovers is extreme, like Marriage Donkey, Edinburgh, you are misogynistic and you still scold others."
Using insulting words to attack female readers is misogyny and double standards
Support platform text locking/banning, believe that jj locking "The heroine is tired of this" and banning "old/tian/nipples" are reasonable and compliant, and accuse the love girl circle of destroying the platform ecology. As a Baidu collaborator, he is openly misogynistic
He used a trumpet account to speak passionately in the Jinjiang netizen exchange area, stigmatizing readers who objected to text locking/banning as a "women-obstructing group," calling them "impediments to creative freedom, reporting of text locks, and cyberbullying of authors."
It was Die Zhiling himself who was criticized for his speech. He immediately deleted the post and pretended to be aggrieved, claiming that he had been bullied online and wanted to sue to defend his rights.
His fans/supporters were accused of making a lot of degrading remarks about women (such as "sew up the b*tch") and looked ugly.
She joined the Red Thorn, Eucalyptus, and Red Ginger Flower camp, and publicly stood up to humiliate female authors. She used the word "obstruction of women's understanding" to insult female readers who made comments in the fan group/Weibo. She used the same words as Red Ginger Flower and the child on the toilet. She did not apologize or respond throughout the whole process, and acquiesced and condoned the violent female readers on the fan network.
The author's writings have long had tendencies of rape, abuse of women, flattery for power, and misogyny. Many of his works feature plots in which women are raped, exterminated, mentally manipulated, and crushed by imperial power. The female characters have long been in a position of humiliation, passivity, and powerlessness, lacking positive redemption. They glorify the perpetrators and praise power, which is essentially to please the misogynistic aesthetic.
The background of the ancient saying ≠ must be written about the abuse of women, and the background of the times cannot be used as a shield to whitewash the content of raping and objectifying women.
The author's public response (Weibo/original words):
"What I wrote is an ancient proverb, and that's the flavor. If you can't accept it, don't read it."
"The characters are like this, the plot is like this, no modifications will be accepted, and no preaching will be accepted."
"Creative freedom, I don't have to cater to anyone."
"Some people took it out of context and used the author's collapse as evidence to attack me."
Attitude towards readers: arrogance, swearing, deletion of comments, blacklisting, covering one's mouth
Readers gently pointed out problems such as plot bugs, abuse of women, and discomfort with robbery in the comment area. The author directly broke through and used swear words to personally attack the readers.
Author/administrator behavior:
A lot of □□
Directly block readers who make comments
Fans control comments and do not allow different voices to exist
Author's original words:
"I make the decision about my writing. If you don't like it, you can leave."
"Don't make excuses in my comment section, it's annoying."
He only hears praises but not a single word of criticism. He stabs female readers in the back while reaping the bonus of female channels.
In the Red Thorn North incident, he did not repost it directly, but he publicly liked and supported the remarks of the author who insulted women. He stood for "creative freedom" and united with Red Thorn North, Eucalyptus cypress, and Red Ginger Flower. He did not condemn the humiliation of women and did not support female readers.
The content of this author's works contains a lot of descriptions of robbery, imperial oppression, female rivalry, and female mutual harm. Most of the female characters are tragic, weak, sacrificed, raped, and have to forgive their perpetrators even after their families are wiped out; there are many male protagonists/male characters. They are rotten cucumbers, perpetrators, powerful people, moral kidnappers, and murderers of the whole family. They are all forcibly whitewashed in the later stages; the endings often force reconciliation, forgiveness of the perpetrators, praise of imperial power, and fatherly preaching. The writing style is depressing, the three views are distorted, and the reading experience is extremely poor.
The author's writings have a tendency to abuse women for a long time. In many works, there are plots in which women are hurt, devalued, and mentally/physically tortured. There is no reasonable resistance and no positive redemption. They abuse women and please misogynistic aesthetics.
Reality is cruel ≠ you must write about abuse of women, don't use reality as a shield and write about misogyny
The author's public response (Weibo/original words):
"What I write is reality, and reality is so cruel."
"Not all stories have to be about having a heroine and being happy, there can also be tragedy and helplessness."
"If you can't accept the abuse, you can point out the cross. Don't teach me how to write."
"Creative freedom, I don't have to cater to anyone."
Attitude towards readers: arrogance, deletion of comments, blacklisting, covering one's mouth
Readers made gentle comments in the comments section, saying that some plots were unfriendly to women and too depressing.
Author/administrator behavior:
A lot of □□
Directly block readers who make comments
Fan groups/comment areas control comments and do not allow different voices.
Author's original words:
"I make the decision about my writing. If you don't like it, you can leave."
"Don't make excuses in my comment section, it's annoying."
He only hears compliments, but not even a single sentence of criticism, and treats readers like leeks.
The hcb incident was not directly forwarded, but in Weibo/author circles, it implicitly supports "creative freedom", which is consistent with the stance of authors such as Red Thorn, Eucalyptus, and Red Ginger Flower.
The content of this author's works contains a lot of descriptions of female rivalry and mutual harm between women. The female characters are often tragic, weak, and often sacrificed.
The male protagonist/male character often looks down from behind and morally kidnaps the female protagonist.
The endings often force reconciliation and forgiveness of the perpetrators, and are preachy and whitewash the bad guys. The writing style is depressing and negative, and the reading experience is poor.
As a female author, she takes the lead in using insulting words to attack female readers, openly sides with and supports behaviors that humiliate women, and consumes female channel traffic but hurts the core group of female readers. There are serious problems in her creation and attitude.
The fan base publicly humiliates women and collectively refers to female readers who express opinions as "obstacles to women's understanding" and insults and expels them.
When Hong Cibei caused controversy due to words that insulted women, he publicly supported him and joined forces with Eucalyptus and others. He took advantage of female channel bonuses but stabbed female readers in the back.
Author's original words (screenshot leaked from fan group):
"Get out of my group"
"Hindering women's solution is to see others, and not to see other people's good things."
"Don't come here to get involved with me, if you don't want to see me, just get out."
On April 5, the author Hong Cibei refused to modify the words that insulted women in the article. On the afternoon of the same day, the author Eubai officially announced his support for "creative freedom" on his Qingming Festival blog.
On the evening of April 5, 2026, Hongjianghua retweeted Eucalyptus cypress Weibo with the text: "Since Eucalyptus cypress is so brave, then I will accompany you to hell once and turn around!"
Now that you have made your position clear, I will not give you face.
Readers of the serial issue of "For the Emperor" provide suggestions on plot rhythm, emotional lines, copy design, etc. In the comment area
Author's original words (composition/reply):
"If you don't like watching, just click the cross button, no one will force you to watch."
"I write for my own pleasure, not to cater to readers."
"If you feel too long or too slow, you can fatten up, don't push me in the comment section."
Fans criticize and cover their mouths
I've crooked my butt and cut my seat. To be honest, I've had this idea for a long time. I don't think I'm sorry for anyone. The only one I'm sorry for is myself. I've stopped caring about everyone for a long time. Because I feel that I have two personalities. The one in front of everyone is the one who wants to make money for everyone and writes heroine novels. The other one is the BL literature that wants to be at ease and doesn't dare to blaspheme. Who are you to ask, do you want love? Do you understand my mood? I am the boss??