I bought more than a thousand books and only focused on four, but I still found a lot of history. All are subjective evaluations and can be watched on demand. The favorites are not ranked.
The story is so great, it is the main thrust of Shou's road to depression. Later, to help Shou overcome it, he still needs to be loved and cared for. It can be listed as one of the stories I want to tackle the most.
I made it all for the sake of scoring. In fact, I couldn't stand it until halfway through the text, but after taking three sets of the illustrations, I was really unhappy [cross hands]
It is very different from the copywriting, and there are too many psychological descriptions of the attack. Isn't this the main and recipient perspective? The feeling of satisfying the desired attack and the cannon fodder attack is almost zero. In short, I don't recommend reading it just because you are interested in the copywriting.
In the extra attack, I claim to be my master's wife/I am called my master's wife. Author, if you continue to attack me with clay sculptures, it is not painful or tiring at all. The benevolent sees the benevolence and the wise see the wisdom. Haha [oh oh oh] [oh oh oh]
I abandoned this book because both Gong and Shou were beaten away by foreign invaders [Rainbow Fart]. It was so frustrating that the plot made me laugh. If you can accept this plot, you can read it.
Saw half of it and ran away. 1. Shou has a tendency to change his university aspirations. If Shou is not fully qualified, Shou will not be able to go to college. However, Shou does not have any family support, and Shou has a happy family with power and money. 2. As someone very close to Shou, Gong's mother used Gong's physical disability to "coerce and induce" Shou and Gong to marry each other for the rest of their lives. 3. Sudden verbal attack occurred in the later period.
The above points are purely subjective evaluations, mainly for my own writing records.
The author has some incredible qualities, which can be seen in the original review. This article is good, but the second half is poorly written. In summary, it starts high and ends low. If the influence of the author is excluded, it will be given 4 stars.