Evaluation scores are purely subjective, and there are both good and bad reviews. Four stars are good, three stars are okay, two stars have many flaws, and one star is poor.
It is very fresh to start from the popularization of law, and the beginning is quite interesting. The anchor's off-topic content makes me look forward to it the most. I stopped watching half of it. First, because of the common problem of live broadcasts, there is too much information and the basic storytelling and interest of novels are lacking. Second, the chapter tips in the table of contents are just like the textbook table of contents. I originally wanted to pick up the rest and read the rest, but this chapter summary does not seem worth buying. After all, I am not here to study legal history. . . . . Don't understand.
97% Subscription, no protagonist, no CP article. It's quite good. I can read it completely and stay interested. The author's writing and plot are OK and relatively mature. The ending is a little rushed. It's a text that can be revisited. (Book list)
74% Of subscriptions, the system live broadcast has no CP and no protagonist. The first third of the main text (the non-holographic part) is watchable, but the subsequent plot is mediocre, a bit run-down, and loses the sense of expectation. Once the holographic part started, it had nothing to do with history. I was bored and just skipped it. Can pass the time. (Book list)
Full order. I relatively like the inventory of poets of the Tang and Song Dynasties, which is like writing a short composition, and the commentary part is fluent in writing and full of content. The content of the Emperor's Inventory was short, and it was gone in a hurry. I bought it but didn't read it carefully because I wasn't excited, so I just went through it quickly. The overall reading process is comfortable and relaxing. (Book list)
67% Are subscribed. The content about historical progress and the output of major principles account for too much. Writing novels as courseware lesson plans is watery and boring. There are few original parts, but the part about changing history and live broadcasting modern tourism is a bit interesting. Jump order, not too impressed after reading it. Not worth a second brush. (Book list)
Subscribe 27%. It's like watching a thesis history text or a text version of a documentary. Although the writing is good, there is too much information. I always feel that it is a waste to buy v and the later part is a bit boring. After all, I am reading the novel and not learning, so I gave up. (Book list)
I fully ordered it and read it in one sitting. Overall it was good, the plot and writing were smooth. Qin Shihuang appeared at the beginning, and the serious inventory was in the last unit. There was not much space, so I didn't read it carefully. (Book list)
Full order. Able to read smoothly, naturally and completely. There are many books to write about, and the author cleverly recommends several of his own pre-releases. Some of the pre-releases are quite interesting and I want to read them. (Book list)
The story deviates from the main line by rambling, there are too many side details to distract from the main story, and the creation of historical characters is frivolous and network-based. The selection of materials is interesting, but it's a pity that Taitai was too watery and didn't stick to the V level. If you like the subject matter, you can read it. (Book list)
No matter what kind of writing there is, there is an audience, and there are quite a few readers, so I still put out a reading list. Then comes the personal perception: first of all, the writing style is childish and novice, secondly, the fan circle of this article is very traced, thirdly, the content is low-level and does not indicate that the information has been carefully checked, and there are many mistakes. Although the author stated in advance that this is a parallel time and space, she did not create a complete and complete history of parallel time and space in the article for readers to understand... Everyone understands. If it's less than two stars "poor", it can only be given one star. (Book list)
71% Subscribed. The first half is quite interesting, but the second half contains too much information and is too watery. It is a one-man show by the up owner and modern netizens. It lacks interaction with ancient people and ancient parties, lacks the reactions and changes of ancient people, and the content is boring and dull. But Shu Huang can still read it. (Book list)
Full order. The heroine has no CP and the writing is OK. This article is more like a historical forum speech than a novel. It focuses on the anchor talking about the life and history of historical figures and the anchor's tools. There is almost no plot outside the live broadcast, and the spectators outside the canopy have no sense of existence. After the anchor finished telling the history, the ending came suddenly. As a novel, it lacks a sense of immersion and an interesting story. I read Su Shi's gossip. (Book list)
Full order. The heroine has no CP. Enjoy watching live reactions from historical figures and changing history. The not-so-good thing is that the author talks too much about historical evaluation, contains private information, and is obviously biased, so it cannot be taken seriously. The overall writing style is passable, the writing is mature, and the ending is relatively quick. I feel like I can continue writing. Can be revisited. (Book list)
97% Subscribed, very smooth writing style, mainly about lectures and the reactions of ancient people, because the lecture content is relatively detailed and inevitably a bit watery. The blessing chapter skips the middle part without affecting the reading and interest at all. (Book list)
The writing is very good, the setting is interesting, and it is relatively novel and rare. There are no obvious logical flaws, but it is a pity that the author failed. (Book list)