I tried my best to describe Boss Dan's surliness, and it felt like there was nothing he could do about it even a little bit more. I can't say that I'm not OOC at all, but without OOC it's hard for me to think of how to team up with Wuhan for cp.
Free and well written
Only people with high moral standards have conscience. A truly bad person will only feel that what is wrong with the world is that he is right, and will not feel that he is bad at all (in a moral sense).
Back then, "Spell Return" wasn't over yet, who would have thought...
This involves a question of mine. Many big IPs never finish their projects just to make money, which leads to the problem that they may be criticized and stabbed in the back at any time. What should the fans do in such a situation?
But this article is still good, huh.
Super recommended!
As a psychopath, the Joker is super difficult to write in every sense of the word, but this article gave me a Joker who I don't think is OOC. Not to mention the real Narcissus (rather than two people with completely different personalities living in the same body) (not to mention two people with the same face).
Even after reading the entire book, it is difficult to confirm whether the protagonist and the clown are two people, or whether the clown is one person. The ambiguity in cognition and setting blurs the boundary between madness and sanity.
I have never felt so at a loss for words.
Due to some reasons that everyone knows, although the protagonist is Black, this book actually has a happy ending for everyone!
I just like everyone having a happy reunion.
The protagonist is competent enough as Black, but it doesn't actually say that he has to kill Red to be competent, right? The protagonist has his own ambitions and goals, and does not harm his own interests throughout the whole process. All good things are achieved through a combination of circumstances (arranged by the author). That's enough. Although I like the Black protagonist, I may not be able to pass the realistic moral test.
"The Picture of Dorian Gray" + "Phantom of the Opera", two wishes are fulfilled at once.
What attracts me most is that the book describes different "goodness" through the protagonists.
The Phantom undoubtedly has no good intentions, but due to external constraints, he will not take the initiative to do evil unless he is provoked first. Being able to do this is already a relatively high moral level in my opinion.
Dorian Gray starts from a person with low moral character who is awakened to a trace of conscience, and then reflects on his own actions, to doing utilitarian good deeds and accumulating virtue, and finally becomes a truly kind person. This series of changes can be called the salvation of one's own soul. The opportunity to be a good person is still there even if it is as fragile as spider silk.
Great fandom!
Hope and the Leader of Hope are very CP-like, not to mention that Komaeda is said to be designed based on Naegi's blackening.
I love gritty protagonists like Naegi.
Are talents worthy of talking about ideals and future? This is not the case. A hundred dollars for a hundred dollars and a million dollars for a hundred dollars are not the same concepts. Talent is just a tool to realize your ideal, but thought is the beacon to your ideal. An ideal that does not change no matter how talented you are is an ideal that has stood the test of time.