This Is a Posthumous Statement, Please Do Not Use It as a Reference for Books.

1 调 Investigators Choose to Drop the Script into the Crater Mo Gui FengNo CP986k WordsCompleted 6.2kFavorites6.3kClicks/ch23.3kNutrition

Curator note

A Yao replied: No problem () I think there should be more normal people like you. Originally, I was searching for enemies in the void, pecking at the air and hurting normal people (bowing) (It does not refer to who is the air, but refers to the behavior of attacking indiscriminately "because I think") The 7th floor and the other 5-10 floors are indeed provocative, smart and incompetent. I am the kind of person who knows how to spot red dots, and I will check the comments regularly to see the replies. You are not wrong. There is no need to delete the comment. I will keep my comment to warn myself. (Bow and apologize) ———————————————————————— My reply is complete. Thank you very much for the possibility of seeing this. It's very presumptuous to disturb you late at night. Hope you have a sweet dream.

2 末 Guide to Self-Rescue After Rebirth in the Apocalypse Du GuangjianmuNo CP81k WordsCompleted 1.5kFavorites4.3kClicks/ch867Nutrition

Curator note

Floor 12 (nickname: hahahaha): "I didn't understand the analogy at first? I scrolled down and saw the first floor at the bottom. As I said at the beginning, I thought this paragraph was written by the author. I also read the previous one a few times without finding it, and then I found out that it was the comment at the bottom. I don't understand what you are talking about? I thought you were going to reply to him, but I was embarrassed to reply. Your paragraph plus the cracked expression, so I opened the first floor alone. The first floor replied that you don't understand what an analogy is, which means that he didn't realize that it was a joke, and he felt that what he said downstairs was also a metaphor. Then you said "What analogy?" I've come to my senses now, and you want to express why the first floor suddenly mentioned the analogy. My understanding at the time was that you didn't understand where the analogy was used in the sentence below, so I explained to you where the analogy was used in the sentence below. I posted two paragraphs. Except for the first half of the first paragraph, I thought you didn't dare to comment on other people's buildings and opened a new one. That's why I initially looked for this paragraph in the article. I admit that this sentence is a bit of a rant, but my subsequent explanation should not be unpleasant. " /Publish time: 2025-09-19 15:47:33 A Yao replied: "I thought this passage was written by the author" I'm really sorry for letting the community stuff mislead you (...) What's more, the author's reply has the author's mark, which can be seen at a glance (...) "I thought you wanted to get back to him, but it turned out you were too embarrassed to get back to him," There is no such thing as "Sorry to reply". I will always see the red dot. If I find that I reply wrongly, I will apply for self-deletion. Generally, the administrator will pass it, and then you won't be able to see this comment. From now on I will stand at attention and receive a beating (). I admit that I am too sensitive to words. When I feel something is wrong, I start to attack and speak harshly. I am sorry for attacking you. I am a very bad person. Floor 13 (nickname: hahahaha): "And some of your next words make me feel guilty for not understanding your meme. I have to go to the encyclopedia first to find out whether the thing I don't understand is a meme. It's impossible for me to go through the encyclopedia word for word for such a long paragraph. I don't understand much. I really don't doubt that it is a meme. Sorry, because I don't understand what you're talking about, I thought you really didn't understand the analogy below. I'm going to explain it to you because I'm being nosy. Then if you see what I said that makes you unhappy, you can point it out directly, and I can delete the comment. You don't need to stack armor to make jokes, but for people like me who don't understand, if you can, don't mark me as a monster in the comment area as soon as it comes up. It's very aggrieved. There is also the 7th floor. Regardless of whether it is a provocation or not, I reply normally. Jinjiang's comments did not prompt other replies except the original poster. I didn't know you replied to me. Today I was looking for someone to leave a mark and remember to recommend the book to the poster. I didn't see your reply until I looked through the comments. If you still have questions, keep asking me, but I won't reply you so quickly because I don't have any prompts here." /?? Publish time: 2025-09-19 16:46:28

3 我 I Am a Student, Give Me the Throne Orange Juice ThanksNo CP662k WordsCompleted 8.4kFavorites9.3kClicks/ch7.2kNutrition

Curator note

11Th Floor (Nickname: Hahahaha) "First, not everyone understands this joke. Second, your three expressions plus the sound of... Are really ironic. The result is that in the eyes of those of us who don't understand the joke, your words are actually quite ironic. The first floor doesn't understand either, so he said an analogy, and then you can explain that you are making a joke after he said it, and you have to add another sentence about what an analogy is. Then I thought you really didn't understand what an analogy is. Didn't I just answer you normally?" /Publish time: 2025-09-19 15:28:07 A Yao replied: I agree that "not everyone understands this joke" and apologize again. Main floor remarks "Three expressions plus the sound of..." In fact, it is not a meme part, but more similar to "because" and "so". It is a kind of yin and yang weird sentence structure specially provided by the community. Moreover, the comment section on the main page is indeed satirizing "the passers-by and cannon fodder who question the protagonist in the article". Even if you don't understand the joke, you can still feel the irony, so you should be able to understand the power and applicability of this sentence in the community x... By the way, let me explain again, the comments in the main paragraph are really not directed at any reader or author. They are an attack on "passers-by and cannon fodder who flood the screen in the article and question the protagonist" and the special yin and yang of the Demons and Dance area. Let me ask here, no one should have been attacked by me, right...? Nope... "You have to add another sentence about what an analogy is." You mean the 2nd floor? I mentioned in the previous article why I say this, I will copy it By the way, looking at it from your perspective, you were innocently attacked by me and still responded normally... I feel guilty now for attacking a rare normal person on the Internet. Rare free people should not be polluted by the chaos of demons. This kind of thing shouldn't be running around in the first place. I didn't take care of myself. The following is the explanation of the reply from the 1st floor → 2nd floor. You can jump after reading it. ———————————————————— Floor 1 (nickname: 5390236): "It's hard to understand even an analogy these days." "I really don't know what analogy he's talking about that's difficult to understand. Possibility 1: He was talking about the page I posted, referring to "10% of the people give out the voices of 90% of the people", which is an analogy to "the current situation of the protagonist in the article". This analogy is very difficult to understand. So the post he posted was to show that he didn't understand. Possibility 2: He was saying that the post I posted was superfluous. There was no such analogy in the article, but I had to use memes to cover up the author's original intention. It's my misunderstanding of this paragraph. Possibility 3: He sent the address to the wrong building Regardless of the possibility, I reply: Floor 2 (nickname: A Yao): "What analogy" /Publish time: 2025-09-03 20:31:43 ——It is common sense to reply to him in this way. I'm waiting for him to reply to me. Although the greater possibility is that he dropped a question or a question and never bothered him again. I have seen this kind of "Q&A" forum a lot, and I didn't have any hope that anyone would reply to me. But I will at least send you a message to confirm whether there is genuine doubt on the first floor, or whether it is yin and yang or provocation. " ——————

4 李 Did Li Mei Backstab the Cursed King Today? Knot CombNo CP236k WordsCompleted 20.6kFavorites39.4kClicks/ch16.2kNutrition

Curator note

/Publish time: 2025-09-09 23:48:23 / Here I would like to apologize to the user with the nickname [Hahahaha] for this. My playing this meme means that I read the community, and staying in the community for a long time makes me have a lot of malice towards the subtlety of the text. Once someone posts a reply [which seems to me to be unclear or accusatory], the first step is to ask about the intention (2nd floor). If someone then replies If you make a sentence with unclear meaning or intend to support the person in front of you, then my attack x will come up, because if you don't attack, the other side will shoot you and hit you and run away (Floors 5-10, especially the 7th floor. The reason why I posted the 7th floor: Why do you still get picked on when you come to the Green River to make fun of me). And just like you said, "Jinjiang's comments are not prompted by other replies except the original poster." Before replying on floors 11-13, I just felt that this building was going to be silent again. I'm sorry for attacking you. In a place where demons are raging, the meaning of even a single word may be misunderstood by the other party. So much so that I did not correct this after coming to Green River, and even forced you to pay for my bad community habits. I am deeply sorry for this. This was not my intention, nor your intention. Accept it or not, I deserve an apology for that. Apology column In any case, it was my fault to bring the community atmosphere into Lujiang. It was me who attacked you indiscriminately (nickname: Hahahaha) (nickname: 5390236), and I am very sorry for this. I promise not to post memes, community comments or abstract comments on Lujiang from September 19, 2025, and be careful not to do it again. Accept it or not, I deserve an apology for that. Regardless of whether there is supervision or not, I will voluntarily abide by this rule - I will not post memes, community comments or abstract comments on Lujiang in the future, and be careful not to do it again. If there is any unintentional trolling behavior, please remind me and I will apply to delete the comment myself. (If there is an apology, it will be the last time I made a joke in Lujiang, and the apology page will not delete it myself) Sorry again, I'm sorry to both of you. / Essentially, the building was created to play on this community meme. I don't force everyone to understand. You really don't understand, you're curious, ask me the normal questions and I'll answer the normal questions. It's really not possible to search 10% → 90% on Baidu, or it's not difficult to check the encyclopedia on AC, Sweet Potato, Scarf and the like. Well, from this perspective, it is understandable to say that I am engaging in abstraction. It is normal to not understand the memes and not play the community. In fact, there are only a few normal people who do not play in the community and are not affected by the community. To this type of people, I am indeed playing abstractly. Then I admit that I am indeed playing with abstraction. The reply on the 10th floor is wrong. I should have replied on the second floor, "What analogy? I'm making a joke (abstraction)." Rather than rushing around as if preparing for an attack. —————————————————————————— Next is the newly published 11-13th floor/nickname: hahahaha/user Reply

5 你 You Seem to Be Painting Me Laqi XiaoxueNo CP1.4M WordsCompleted 57.8kFavorites118.7kClicks/ch209.6kNutrition

Curator note

I came down to express my speechlessness at being picked on for playing tricks on Lujiang (I think), and by the way, I also attack the possible provocations, which are specifically manifested in blaming other people for being monster spawners in the Duanjing area; The last floor is really speechless. I don't understand why some people would be offended by the comments on the main floor (this floor and the second floor). It is obvious that this meme is attacking passers-by and cannon fodder in the article. (Warning!! The following is a copy of the original building, and the text consists of a large number of offensive x comments) 5th Floor (nickname: A Yao): "Does anyone understand? If the two people above are still reading, could you please take a look at this? "10% Of the people make 90% of the sound" is actually a community meme. The general meaning is that 90% of the players in some game groups have fun playing, so they are the silent majority. Only 10% of people are not very happy, but their dissatisfaction almost covers the entire community, causing the entire community to become huge, as if everyone who plays this game thinks this game is not fun. The reason I say this is because the protagonist is now in a very similar situation. Not everyone is slandering the protagonist, but the people who are slandering the protagonist are constantly posting on the public screen, making them appear to be very powerful. When I search, there are only a few people, and they look very clownish [Cracked] Do you understand this? " /Publish time: 2025-09-09 23:39:08 6th floor (nickname: A Yao): "I'm just making a meme. So far, this meme has not offended any polite person, right [change]. If I have offended you, please point it out and I will apologize, and then I will delete it myself. OK? If you understand this meme, you will smile knowingly. If you don't understand it, you will forget it. , This is not a black or yellow stalk, it is just a humorous description of the protagonist's current situation. Isn't it difficult to search the encyclopedia of stalks on the Internet? [Split] [Split] [Split] Who is offended by this stalk? [Split] "[Split] /?? Publish time: 2025-09-09 23:42:06 7th Floor (nickname: A Yao): Huh? Say! Um? Say! /Publish time: 2025-09-09 23:45:25 8th Floor (nickname: A Yao): [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] [crack] /Publish time: 2025-09-09 23:45:37 9th floor (nickname: A Yao): [Cracked][Cracked][Cracked][Cracked][Cracked][Cracked][Cracked] "I don't understand, do you need to have such thick armor to play a joke? An outsider can tell me whether my attack /Publish time: 2025-09-09 23:46:51 10th Floor (nickname: A Yao): "The description is also the current situation in the article. I am not even abstract or digressing. The ridicule is aimed at the passers-by and cannon fodder in the article. Who have I offended?" [Crack][Crack][Crack][Crack][Crack][Crack]

6 请 Please Call Me the Scene-Stealing King Laqi XiaoxueNo CP2.1M WordsCompleted 28.1kFavorites49.4kClicks/ch133.7kNutrition

Curator note

3Rd floor (nickname: hahahaha): "I was still looking where it was written that 10% of people make 90% of the voice. I read the author's words back and forth seven or eight times but still couldn't find it. Then I went back to the comment area and swiped down [holding my chin] It's true, if you want to go back to someone else's house, just go back downstairs instead of opening a separate building. The analogy is that the number of 0.35% Aite is comparable to that of others' 10%, which shows that they talk a lot. After all, the author didn't write that they only used Aite once. The author only mentioned those with malicious Aite and those who followed the trend, so why should they be separated? Does it mean that Aite, who is malicious to Aite, has done it many times? " /Publish time: 2025-09-09 16:41:04 Floor 4 (nickname: Hahahaha): "Oh, no. They haven't said that 10% of the people in the article spoke out for 90% of the people's voices [split] They used the people who talk the most in the community to compare it to the people who talk the most in the article [question mark] This is a substitution analogy and not a direct equivalent." /Publish time: 2025-09-09 16:44:30 / "I was still looking where it was written that 10% of the people make 90% of the noise. I read the author's words back and forth seven or eight times but still couldn't find it. Then I went back to the comment area and swiped down [Tickling my chin]" Then, you mentioned in your sentence here: "Really, if you want to go back to someone else's house, just go downstairs and open a separate building." This sentence is the point that really puzzles me and makes me feel like I am about to be attacked. First, because I'm not posting this just to reply to anyone. My building has nothing to do with other buildings. Secondly, I may think that you and the first floor think that I use memes randomly and forcefully use inappropriate memes to add meaning to this paragraph that does not originally belong to it. And I haven't seen it yet, so you remind me further. Thirdly, I may think that you are reminding/accusing me - it is very unnecessary to post a single post on the first floor just to make memes. Indiscriminate use of community memes can also cause discomfort, and the first floor may have posted comments for this reason. Fourth, I may think that after reading my paragraph review, you feel that I forcibly used my own paragraph commentary to add meaning to this paragraph that is not what the author intended to express, and it seriously affects the sense of the text and the viewing experience of other readers. / In fact, I didn't even scroll down to comment after posting this post. I haven't even read what the people below said. After I posted this sentence, I never thought about it again. Until the first floor suddenly said, "It's hard for people to understand even an analogy these days." I presume that after I was attacked, my comments would not only be unfriendly, but also full of aggression and yin and yang. Without knowing their respective perspectives, I decided to post all the above possibilities (in an unfriendly manner). First, explain the original intention of the remarks; Then ask/check the other party's ingredients in an unfriendly, shady tone to confirm whether the other party is really not provocative, just raising questions; After trying this possibility, he made an attack x statement to target the atmosphere and possible provocation that no one responded to at the time (and the really innocent person who was attacked /nickname: hahahaha/);