The interstellar holographic fourth natural disaster is good-looking and a bit relaxing, but the question is, am I not hoarding articles? Why? Why click in and see that the author's update frequency is not high, don't be fooled (cracked) (it is recommended to read after finishing) (if you are short of food, you can read a little now)
Probably for online games, I was hoarding articles before, but now I have finished the main article. I've watched about 30% of it, and my impression is that it's okay, maybe 3.8. After all, I haven't finished watching it yet so I can't give it a good rating.
It's quite satisfactory. It's written at the beginning that the second game is jointly created by the governments of four planets, and there is also a background of alien beasts in the game. It gives a feeling that the real situation is not peaceful, but it is only briefly mentioned as a background board, and this setting is never mentioned again. I don't think you should write about this setting if you don't have one. Moreover, the rebirth written at the beginning seems to be that the game is gone and so the consciousness is gone. The ending written later seems to be killed in the game and then reborn. The setting in the previous article is not very clear. The content of the game is just average, and the adoptive father is so well-written, but it turns out to be just a golden finger that comes to give away wealth. It feels a bit emmmy. Jing Feng did not recover his memory later, and I feel that the time-travel + rebirth factor is not necessary. Time-travel gave him a brother, amnesia gave him a wealthy adoptive father's tool man, and rebirth gave him a lover... In summary: put aside your mind and watch it to kill time.
3.5 Points, the front part is okay, quite interesting, but the quality of the back part is not as good as the front part, especially the emotional line, which is not natural enough (if you like holograms, you can check it out, if you don't like holograms, you can skip it)
It's an old article from a long time ago. I personally think it's well written. It's a traditional online game. The difference is that the names of the characters in the article are basically game IDs. Only the names of the characters are written later, but the names are not that important later. I'm used to IDs. I prefer group portrait articles. I think it's quite interesting.