Scores based solely on reasoning.
Game and system elements are more important. The heroine is very cute and relies heavily on the game system. The evidence is given directly by colleagues or the system, and the reasoning is based on intuition. The heroine showed no logical reasoning ability in the process of solving the case. I only read the first main case, and the chain of evidence, motive for committing the crime, and method of solving the case were a bit stiff. It was more about the author showing the pity of the prisoner. Not very appetizing.
Free. It is a very early mystery novel with female characters as the main character, so it is normal to have some twists and turns and be a bit boring.
Reasoning + system + martial arts. The author is very attentive and will analyze the clues of the original text in his words.
The reason for abandoning the article is that there is no sense of immersion, and the unit story is a bit boring. I often feel like "Oh, the murderer is him, and the protagonist found out like this. Well, it's over."
The background is England in the eighteenth century, and the author is a textual critic. There isn't much daily life, it's all cases. More fun.
At the age of seventeen, the heroine suddenly recalled her modern memories of her previous life and had a basic concept of equality between women and men. The reasoning is based on the original logic, with the help of doctors and financial support from the male protagonist.
The heroine has almost no empathy for disadvantaged groups (except women) and has no attitude towards class. This is particularly good. I personally think that as a neutral party, detectives should try not to involve their personal feelings in the case. Except for reasoning and family, personal emotional preferences are not obvious. The emotional scenes are a little greasy later on.