The young man was named a prostitute, accused of being a rapist, and was accused and interrogated by the Republic Inquiry Court. In order to uncover the truth, all the women who had been in contact with him appeared in court one by one for cross-examination. The same thing is described very differently in the mouths of young people and in the mouths of those involved. How can an interrogation court, which upholds impartiality and is responsible for safeguarding justice and morality, eliminate falsehoods while retaining truths, and make fair judgments and convictions? Or, after a trial, someone else is really guilty?
Purpose: The judge does not represent justice, and sin exists in all interpersonal relationships. To convict, we must not only find out what the crime is, but also explore the "why" behind it.