If a contract is unbreakable – what about a forgotten contract?
If a counterfeit is believed to be the real deal from start to finish – is it really necessary to expose it?
If a girl is swept into the whirlpool by the times - is she really obligated to take responsibility?
In the year 672 of the Holy Calendar, on the eve of the fall of the royal capital, the king entrusted the secret of the throne to the archbishop and two confidants: his orphan Serra, and a marriage contract that had never been made public.
Fourteen years later, that name was mentioned again. People rumored that the missing princess might still be alive.
And she, a girl who couldn't even remember her parents' names and grew up in a remote monastery, never thought that she would have anything to do with the crown.
But the other girl, the girl who grew up in the palace, was forced to wear a crown that did not belong to her.
If it weren't for the constraints of the times, who would be willing to be another self?
If the truth is just a greater danger, then is the fictional identity the shell of protection?
Is an engagement from the dead really more important than the current power and silence?
And can they still trust each other's eyes beyond their fate?
Purpose: Contracts are indelible