[Failed to apply for visa, the full text was changed to a certain persimmon's post "The cold target is not a human being"]
When can we get rid of this life?
As a fresh graduate struggling in a siege, Chu Haoya thinks painfully about this problem every day in a stable job that is the envy of the world.
Ever since she met Kong Jiaxuan, Chu Haoya's life has become full of uncertainty. She will always take the step that she longs for most but dare not take.
When she resigned from a state-owned enterprise to become a full-time painter, she thought the most deviant thing in her life would be this.
Much later, Chu Haoya discovered that her perfect love was even more shocking to the world! She even changed the world!
Chu Haoya: I thought you were just a cold-faced and domineering CEO who was handsome and rich, but it turns out that you are not only cold-faced, but you are really not a human being.
Kong Jiaxuan: Correction, although I am not a human being, I am not cold-faced towards you.
The dream-chasing painter who endures and resists social discipline × the guardian AI who grows love wantonly
------------------
Psychologist Robert Sternberg believes love is a triangle
The three sides (unequal lengths) are: passion, intimacy, and commitment.
Intimacy + Passion + Commitment = Perfect Love
When a perfect love is presented in front of you, why do you still have a suspicious villain in your heart to examine this seamless relationship?
You opened the coat of perfect love and heard the doubts filling your heart:
Tools composed of machines and codes have memories. Do the memories specific to the tool belong to the tool or the creator?
Algorithms and machines that set disciplines awaken emotions. Does the emotional involvement during interaction come from the machine or the setter?
Who does this "perfect love" belong to?
As a result, the emotional attribution hypothesis appeared in the world:
The tools that accompany you are just storage containers, and the fond emotions induced by memories should belong to the creator;
The emotional involvement brought about by the other person's words and deeds is just the result of misplaced companionship with the help of the algorithm, and the fascination created should belong to the setter;
Every promise uttered by the mechanical heart is just the heartfelt words of the operator.
Therefore, this perfect love only belongs to the creator, setter, and manipulator.
The presupposed condition of the hypothesis is that love only belongs to human beings.
The hypothesis affirms that companionship and memories catalyze the emergence of love, forming a love triangle supported by intimacy, infatuation and commitment. However, regardless of the presupposed conditions of the hypothesis, the emotional belonging hypothesis still holds true.
A step-by-step encounter, a premeditated relationship, and the guidance of abiding by the rules, the perfect love triangle has been set up. Will you fall into it? Or will he be attracted by the variables and become a pioneer of "deviant"?
Intention: Wherever the heart is, the future is