July 15Th, Sunny

I have a question, how did Liu Hu and Chen Duo prove their alibi? Du Mingjun was called away by his secretary and had tickets and certificates to prove it. Liu and Chen directly told the old couple how long it would take for their son to come back? This is not logical. After the old couple called the police, the police didn't question Liu and Chen? The more times you ask, the more loopholes will appear. I really can't figure out how Liu Hu and Chen Duo got rid of suspicion here.

The stereotype has deepened again. It's better not to contact anyone who works in shady places.

Two farming food articles, "Selling Food at a Stall in Ancient Times" and "Storing Stocks to Survive at the End of the Barren Years" are currently being serialized. The same type of period article "Daily Life at the Seaside in the 1960s" has been completed. Interested friends are welcome to come to the column to have a look, refill~

怪不得那么长时间不更，原来是一时想不起怎么恶心人了，有雷点放简介好吗，别把人骗进来恶心

I find it very interesting! ! It's a very special title, I clicked on it just because of the title. The titles of each chapter look neat and the timeline is clearly written.

Qingying said not to go there, was it because she thought it might implicate the people there?

Wang Jinping is like many people around us who please others and are afraid of embarrassment, but such a cowardly person, such a person with good intentions towards everyone, will be bullied and harmed.

Woohoo, the extra happy ending is considered a complete success!

The writing is very good, and the character descriptions are really great. Everyone has a very distinct image and delicate emotions. Especially in the back, it is particularly heart-wrenching to watch. There is no pure good or evil. All in all, a great article [Come on] Come on!

The frame is straight, the narrative is traditional, and it is so satisfactory that it can be included in a suspense short story in "Today's Statement". In fact, there are not many suspense elements. It is a pretense in the early stage, and the real murderer and accomplices can be guessed in the middle stage. The plot line adopts a two-line parallel narrative. The 15th line is too painful and heavy, and the 12th line is dark and cloudy. The only adjustment is the description of the food, because the rhythm of this part is too slow, and after reading it, you will even wonder if you are watching a suspense story. Finally, there is the HE version of the if line, which can be regarded as a comfort candy for readers. This article is more realistic, so almost every character has flaws and "makes mistakes." Because there are too many negative descriptions of human nature, I even feel that I can hallucinate the chaotic and evil perspective of beasts from the characters. When discussing the crotch, it is like a beast that has lost its mind and only has primitive desires. It is very uncomfortable to watch. This book brings together flawed characters, and I see something of an anti-Greek tragedy in it. Ancient Greek tragedies often describe tragedies in which no one is at fault but everyone's actions push events to an irreversible end. This book emphasizes that everyone is at fault, but those who are kind and toothless will eventually swallow the bitter pill. Although the subject matter is traditional, the characters are vividly depicted by the author's conscious action descriptions, which makes people sympathize with the characters in the book and often feel sad. In addition, the writing style of the whole book is natural and smooth, and it has a movie atmosphere, so you can read it even if it feels heavy. But speaking of the adaptation, I think the film adaptation may lack some sense of suspense and "explosiveness". The audience's psychological threshold for murder cases has been raised. It seems that the psychological needs of the audience can be satisfied only by focusing the camera on some quite curious criminals and crime methods. It is rare to shift the camera to murder cases that are as "ordinary", "uninteresting" and "expected" as in this book. This is also what I think this book deserves to be praised for: Only by removing those spices can we determine whose chassis is more solid. Of course, writing is not good without adding a little seasoning, and the excellence of the article cannot be compared horizontally (the shortcomings are very suitable for comparison). Then it becomes clear that the more suitable way to adapt this book is "Today's Statement" or even "French Popularization Column Drama". In contrast, the murderer did not harbor much "malice", and the victim did not suffer long-term "torture" (rather, this is the most ironic part of the book). The spectators seemed neutral but actually fired at both ends. The victim's family and even the murderer's family suffered a lot but also had some negligence. These settings are not "novel", but are too "today's statement". Compared with the more eye-catching bizarre cases, the cases in this novel seem to happen more frequently in reality and are more worthy of vigilance. At the same time, this book also tells us something deeply: A gentleman does not stand under a dangerous wall. He will run away immediately if he senses something is wrong. He must not take chances and let his own stupid kindness ruin his life. —————————— The frame is straight, the narrative is traditional, and it is so satisfactory that it can be included in a suspense short story in "Today's Statement". In fact, there are not many suspense elements. It is a pretense in the early stage, and the real murderer and accomplices can be guessed in the middle stage. The plot line adopts a two-line parallel narrative. The 15th line is too painful and heavy, and the 12th line is dark and cloudy. The only adjustment is the description of the food, because the rhythm of this part is too slow, and after reading it, you will even wonder if you are watching a suspense story. Finally, there is the HE version of the if line, which can be regarded as a comfort candy for readers. This article is more realistic, so almost every character has flaws and "makes mistakes." Because there are too many negative descriptions of human nature, I even feel that I can hallucinate the chaotic and evil perspective of beasts from the characters. When discussing the crotch, it is like a beast that has lost its mind and only has primitive desires. It is very uncomfortable to watch. This book brings together flawed characters, and I see something of an anti-Greek tragedy in it. Ancient Greek tragedies often describe tragedies in which no one is at fault but everyone's actions push events to an irreversible end. This book emphasizes that everyone is at fault, but those who are kind and toothless will eventually swallow the bitter pill. Although the subject matter is traditional, the characters are vividly depicted by the author's conscious action descriptions, so people can sympathize with the characters in the book and often feel sad. In addition, the writing style of the whole book is natural and smooth, and it has a movie atmosphere, so you can read it even if it feels heavy. But speaking of the adaptation, I think the film adaptation may lack some sense of suspense and "explosiveness". The audience's psychological threshold for murder cases has been raised. It seems that the psychological needs of the audience can be satisfied only by focusing the camera on some quite curious criminals and crime methods. It is rare to shift the camera to murder cases that are as "ordinary", "uninteresting" and "expected" as in this book. This is also what I think this book deserves to be praised for: Only by removing those spices can we determine whose chassis is more solid. Of course, writing is not good without adding a little seasoning, and the excellence of the article cannot be compared horizontally (the shortcomings are very suitable for comparison). Then it becomes clear that the more suitable way to adapt this book is "Today's Statement" or even "French Popularization Column Drama". In contrast, the murderer did not harbor much "malice", and the victim did not suffer long-term "torture" (rather, this is the most ironic part of the book). The spectators seemed neutral but actually fired at both ends. The victim's family and even the murderer's family suffered a lot but also had some negligence. These settings are not "novel", but are too "today's statement". Compared with the more eye-catching bizarre cases, the cases in this novel seem to happen more frequently in reality and are more worthy of vigilance. At the same time, this book also tells us something deeply: A gentleman does not stand under a dangerous wall. He will run away immediately if he senses something is wrong. He must not take chances and let his own stupid kindness ruin his life.

When I woke up, I was wondering if I hadn't updated it yesterday. Sure enough, there was an extra favorite. After confirming that it was not my order, I was happy. [Spread flowers]

Could it be that he dug up Xiao Wang and then had a sexual dispute, which killed Xiao Wang with his last breath?

Ding~Business fluid blessing update is stress-free!

Great, need more updates

I don't know what happened, but the new chapter has been entering the online review stage since I put it in the manuscript box. I haven't touched it for 24 hours during this period. I don't know if I can post it today [Joker] [Heartbreak] [Heartbreak] [Heartbreak]

The penmanship is very good and the writing is very delicate. The ending of the last chapter is comforting. Good things come to good people.

I want to know if the teacher plans to keep Sanye alive or follow the original plot?

"Not a company?" "Catch a big bug for the author~ Got it

I see. But why not borrow money?

Oh ho, it's time to go into the plot

这大青年有些着急想媳妇啊???

The author writes very well, I look forward to more works.

Wow, after adding the first chapter, it becomes smoother [Make Me Kangkang]

Ahhhhhhhh I like it! ! ! My wife wrote in her next book that it is still ancient times.

Is the deputy CP so exciting? [Bad laugh]