History cannot be changed.
When history no longer becomes history, the long river of time branches off into new tributaries.
We cannot change history, but we can change the "future."
When the long river of time flows, countless quantum processes produce a large number of superimposed worlds at each Planck time, that is, parallel universes. These parallel universes are like small bubbles attached to the huge bubble of the main world.
Some bubbles will go on an alternative development track due to different physical rules. In the end, the "truth" cannot be self-consistent, and the bubble bursts.
There are also parts that will approach the main world and become another parallel space in a universal sense.
If we live broadcast history in a parallel world and change the "past", can we gain a new "future"?
[A surprising turning point in history]
[If the First Emperor possessed four great inventions]
[Only respect Confucianism? No, it's a hundred schools of thought contending]
[A list of the emperors chosen by heaven in the feudal dynasty]
[To be continued]
Note: Starting from the second video, some simple economic theories will be mixed in. They are all simple, I promise!
Demining:
1. I am not a physics major, and all settings are fiction and fantasy.
2. I am not a history major. I will try my best to be objective in all my opinions and try to consult historical materials and papers.
3. I am not a professional author. I hope to find readers who resonate with me. I welcome your meaningful criticisms and suggestions.
4. I am not a keyboard expert, so I hope there will be no groundless accusations or quarrels, peace&love
5. Although I don't have grand ambitions, I still hope to have a little cute person to support me when I cut my own legs. This is my first time writing an article, and my level is yet to be determined.
Purpose: Reading history can make people wise
Reader comments
Let's talk about Fusu's advice. In the late Warring States period, hundreds of schools of thought wrote books and established theories, and many schools quoted Confucius' remarks. Even Legalists Han Fei and Li Si often mentioned and praised Confucius. It was not only Confucian scholars who respected Confucius.
Fusu's remonstrance was based on the fact that the Six Kingdoms had just surrendered to Qin. It turned out that the scholars in Guandong were dissatisfied. If they were suppressed with severe punishment, the foundation of the world would definitely be shaken. His purpose in saying these words was just to stabilize the country of Qin, not to promote Confucianism. From the beginning to the end of his remonstrance, he did not request the restoration of ancient ritual systems, the implementation of enfeoffments, or the abolition of the county and county systems.
It is a big mistake for later generations to interpret the history of the Warring States, Qin and Han Dynasties only from the Song and Ming dynasties.
The political thought of the Qin State itself included two paths: Shang Yang and Han Fei originally believed that when conquering the world, severe punishments could be used, but to defend the world, a lenient policy should be implemented. This is the proposition of Legalism itself.
Let's talk about Fusu's advice. In the late Warring States period, hundreds of schools of thought wrote books and established theories, and many schools quoted Confucius' remarks. Even Legalists Han Fei and Li Si often mentioned and praised Confucius. It was not only Confucian scholars who respected Confucius. Fusu's remonstrance was based on the fact that the Six Kingdoms had just surrendered to Qin. It turned out that the scholars in Guandong were dissatisfied. If they were suppressed with severe punishment, the foundation of the world would definitely be shaken. His purpose in saying these words was just to stabilize the country of Qin, not to promote Confucianism. From the beginning to the end of his remonstrance, he did not request the restoration of ancient ritual systems, the implementation of enfeoffments, or the abolition of the county and county systems. It is a big mistake for later generations to interpret the history of the Warring States, Qin and Han Dynasties only from the Song and Ming dynasties. The political thought of the Qin State itself included two paths: Shang Yang and Han Fei originally believed that when conquering the world, severe punishments could be used, but to defend the world, a lenient policy should be implemented. This is the proposition of Legalism itself.