The article I wrote ten years ago should be published and exposed to the sun. It has been modified several times and a lot of effort has been spent, but the result is hard to describe. I will continue to change it in the future until I am satisfied. Is this considered craftsmanship?
I have read many legends and stories about Lu Ban, hundreds of them, and I have deep admiration for this ancestor of philosophers and craftsmen. After the college entrance examination that year, I almost signed up for a major in architecture out of excitement.
Boldly try the first-person perspective without blaspheming the saints. The writing is not good either, and I have no idea what it feels like when I read it. So there was an article like this, about how Ban Shu and Mo Zhai combined their Taoist weapons to stop Chu from attacking Song.
As for the birthplaces and dates of birth and death of the two sages, as well as whether Mozi saved the Song Dynasty is a historical fact, there are still disputes in the academic community. We don't understand that. We just used one of the explanations. For the needs of the plot, it should not step on "thunder", right?
Concept: Interpret ancient classics from a new perspective