Wen Yan, a level 10 social animal, stayed up late to read an ancient pornographic novel.
The male protagonist in the book is vicious and vicious, deceiving his body and mind, tricking a cannon fodder female supporting character into helping him kill the fatuous tyrant, and then kills the female supporting character and spends a night with the female protagonist. Among them, the female partner is vicious and cunning, and the tyrant is a love-minded man who works for the female partner. They are the most important stumbling blocks on the road to the sadomasochistic relationship between the male and female protagonists. Death is not a pity.
It is worth mentioning that Wen Yan dressed as this female counterpart.
So in order to survive, Wen Yan decided to sacrifice his appearance to hug the tyrant's thigh and kill the male protagonist first. However, when she affectionately walked up to the tyrant, she heard the man sitting on the high platform say, "Drag him down and chop him down," before she even said her lines.
Wen Yan: "???"
Where is the love brain that we promised to be obsessed with the female supporting role? !
----------
Xiao Fu, a genuine overbearing CEO, a lover of bloody sadomasochism... And the author, traveled back in time seven years after ending his romantic and ignorant first love, and became the cannon fodder tyrant of an ancient novel of his. The mission of time travel is to make up for the regrets of the male and female protagonists, and clear all the stumbling blocks on their love journey.
So on the first day of time travel: kill the vicious female supporting character first!
The second day of time travel: Please tell me, how to kill the vicious female supporting character obsessed with the tyrant without going OOC?
The third day of time travel: The vicious female protagonist is OOC. Why not recycle this double-standard system? ?
…
The nth day of time travel: What should I do if I suddenly find out that the person I want to kill is my first love? ? ?
Note: OOC refers to character breakdown
Intention: Not like catkins blowing up in the wind