[New Peerless Double Pride 3] over the Years

One-sentence copy: It tells what happened after the decisive battle between the two prides. The male protagonist Jiang Wuque, the buff at the beginning, and his wife were separated, and the female protagonist is the villain, who will do whatever it takes to achieve her goals. If you think it's ridiculous, please avoid it, there's no need to waste everyone's time. That same reader, please don't make any more comments about this article. If I hadn't been notified by the editor that the article would be locked for rectification, I wouldn't have logged in to read the comments. Who the hell has time to log in every day to see if I owe money to a scoundrel? I said I didn't care about you before because I only knew that I was being complained about and had no idea what the complaint was about: "□□, the author claimed in the comments that he wrote the fanfic just for prostitution. NP, 1 woman and 3 men, □□, involving a father and son. The female protagonist married the male protagonist, and in the extra story, she cheated on him with the male protagonist's son." What the hell, what I call "whoring" is just a YY role. When it comes to your mouth, it means the same thing as whoring/prostitution? Look at the complaint yourself. Is one sentence true? You forced me to self-examine an article written eight years ago, and you wasted so much of my time. It would be strange if I didn't get angry. As for those dirty comments in the comment area, they have been floating under my article for a year. Except for the 4 posts I seriously replied to when I updated the article next door, do you think I have ignored you for the dozens of other comments? Also, don't pretend to be innocent again, Jinjiang's complaints are all well-founded. I have never seen anyone more cowardly than you. Someone caught him out before and he didn't dare to show up again for several months. It's not enough that the comment that caught you was deleted after you complained. Someone hacked my account from nowhere and posted a lot of inexplicable short comments under my article to suppress your previous comments. Just because I have no evidence and am too lazy to reset the points of all the posted comments one by one does not mean that I don't know that there is someone behind this. You said that you were caught once and made a comment without changing your IP, and then came back a few months later. No matter how stupid you are, you should have known how to use a proxy, and you still used the excuse that you didn't know how to use a proxy. The tone is exactly the same, even the wording is exactly the same as your previous comment. Could it be that I specifically plagiarized you when others made comments? The IP addresses of these comments since September are indeed different from yours, so you can tell me that because you didn't know how to change IPs a long time ago and were caught, so a few months later I suspected that those comments with different IPs were made by you. Instead, they were all my conspiracy theory, that I framed a good person? You think I'm stupid, and you dare to say anything to me. If I think it's you, it's you, just like how wronged you are, so now it's my glass heart that pours dirty water on you? In fact, of all the things you have done, scolding me is the lightest one. Don't think that just to throw a 100 yuan thunder, you will avoid the important things and clean up the other dirty things you have done, and also blackmail me by the way. It is because of my poor psychological quality that I will blame all bad and bad things on you. But you weren't afraid when you did those dirty things, and you didn't feel shameless when you cursed so harshly, but you were still afraid of people knowing after you had done it? I wasn't sure before that someone would go to Taobao to buy comments to suppress the accusations because they were exposed. Who would have known that the day before yesterday, I uploaded your evidence for the second time, and in the blink of an eye, you deleted the evidence by complaining about it in your own comments. Your comments with vulgar language have been left on my post for so long and I cannot delete them. Even if the personal attacks are deleted, you will still come back in a few months. On the contrary, every time someone catches me in a pigtail, I complain and my comments are deleted faster than anyone else! If you want to delete it, just delete it, and then you will be bombarded and hinted aggrievedly that if I want to hang up, of course I can continue to hang up, but except for the evidence I posted, I can't blame you for anything else. But I beg you, in addition to the well-founded and well-founded reviews I posted, as well as the registered complaints in Jinjiang, I have only 5 negative reviews from readers with different IP addresses than yours. See clearly, it's not that other attacks have nothing to do with you, but those "others" are just bad comments from 5 people. So I don't understand where your logic comes from. It seems like there are other people besides you who are chasing after such a cold talk like me. Especially among those 5 people, the two most recent ones have exactly the same tone and wording as you. Do you still need me to repost them and compare them word by word with your previous comments? In addition to those 5 comments, I did recently delete a 2-star review that the reader and the author disagreed with because the review received a lot of dirty comments. Although the IP addresses of those replies are different from yours, even the words used look different from yours. However, that comment made the same subjective mistake as your other comments. That is, the male partner in my article did not kill his wife at all. However, those replies that seemed to have nothing to do with you were repeating the same wrong argument as you, which is that "it is extremely disgusting for a male partner to kill his wife." Is there such a coincidence in the world that despite the facts that can be seen at a glance in the article, readers one after another come at me with the same wrong arguments? Okay, I have now given you a detailed analysis of the evidence down to each comment. Although many of them have been deleted due to your complaints, I still have the background and can post them to you at any time if you want. And in view of your guilty reaction after being caught twice, I kind of agree with what you said. That is, all the comments and messy things about this article since this year, whether it is the negative reviews that scold me, or the inexplicable positive reviews that are like a machine, or even more clicks in a few months than in years (for such a cold old article, each chapter has a single-digit number of clicks), I now feel that it is possible that it was written by one person. In fact, if you are really afraid that someone will actually doxx you, then you can rest assured that doxxing is illegal. At most, you can go to the Internet police to ask an acquaintance about the situation and see how to deal with such persistent Internet scum. 17/09/30 -------------------------------------------------- For the reader who has been struggling with this article for almost a year, I once advised you that everyone has his or her own moral standards, but that does not mean that everything you hate should be completely extinct from this world. My last reply, if you like to complain and leave comments, please continue: 1. Summarizing your point of view, you think: I created an original female protagonist and fell in love with a male character who already has a CP in the original game, which is an act of mistress. However, my settings are different from the original work, but you insist that I have not paid copyright fees to the game company, so I have no right to change the settings in a free article. Otherwise, it will insult the classics in the eyes of the majority of players. Even though my purpose in changing the settings was to make the emotional line conform to the three views, you still used the plot in the game (please: it is completely different from my article!) To slander the characters and the author. Even because I created a villain (Jiang Yulang needs no introduction, the hostess is also a villain), and because the villain's morals are unethical and his political views are not clear enough, you conclude that I, the author, and the article have incorrect views that make you sick? 2. Some of the 0-point comments you posted under the article were deleted, unjustly accusing the author and website of not giving you freedom of speech. Here are the reasons for deletion: part of it is that you personally attacked the author, part of it is that you used the same IP address to pretend to be a different reader to post comments, and part of it is that you made untrue remarks, so it was deleted by the administrator in accordance with the website regulations. The author has no right to delete your 0-point review. 3. You never changed your IP address before and got caught. Maybe you will be more careful in the future. If the comments come from different regions, of course you can justifiably say that I framed you. There are so many negative comments in this article. It is obvious that game fans all over the world are disgusted by me. Look, everyone is agreeing with you. But a true conscience does not mean that you are righteous if you get everyone to agree with you; it means that even if you are the only one, you can still touch your own conscience and get along with yourself! That's called having a clear conscience. For an article that you don't even understand the real setting, you take it out of context every day, mess around, and use all kinds of tricks behind your back. How hysterical are you, and how inexplicable is it for me, a passerby author, don't you have some idea in your own mind? 4. Finally, this reader, no matter what the original game means to you, no matter how noble my feelings are hurt by this article, I have only one sentence left to reply to you: I am too lazy to care about you. Conception: