People like JIGSAW are probably judges who think they are superior. At that time, many states in the United States did not have the death penalty. For those guilty, atonement was just another place to live, not to mention that some people were not even punished by law. At this time, serial killers like JIGSAW, because they had the ability (regardless of their qualifications), did their best to torture the bodies and minds of those who were living an ignoble existence. Compared with vigilantes, the difference is their brutal killing behavior. Some people say that JIGSAW actually knows that he is not a good person. Thinking about it this way, criminals who kill to satisfy their own desire to kill or for other reasons cannot be compared with JIGSAW at all. Is this attempt to conduct a trial above the law a good thing or a bad thing? After all, it allows criminals who have escaped justice to be punished. It's just that some of the sinners he selected were not so heinous and needed to be tortured inhumanely.
People like JIGSAW are probably judges who think they are superior. At that time, many states in the United States did not have the death penalty. For those guilty, atonement was just another place to live, not to mention that some people were not even punished by law. At this time, serial killers like JIGSAW, because they had the ability (regardless of their qualifications), did their best to torture the bodies and minds of those who were living an ignoble existence. Compared with vigilantes, the difference is their brutal killing behavior. Some people say that JIGSAW actually knows that he is not a good person. Thinking about it this way, criminals who kill to satisfy their own desire to kill or for other reasons cannot be compared with JIGSAW at all. Is this attempt to conduct a trial above the law a good thing or a bad thing? After all, it allows criminals who have escaped justice to be punished. It's just that some of the sinners he selected were not so heinous and needed to be tortured inhumanely.