Thanks for the invitation.
I happen to be invincible.
——Kongjo Chengmei.
—————————————————————————
Kujo Seimei × 5T5, the story of losing the dice. Don't ask, just ask: the lottery factors are "sexual transformation", "strongest" and "platinum".
We don't rule out triangle literature, right Xia You?
Sorry, Dad Hui!
If Xia You grabs the pen, you can't blame me. JPG
Big timeline move!
This article is also known as #About Wujo Satoru who took the answer and got zero points from copying it#, #How to enter Zong Kongjojia# and so on.
—————————————————————————
Also, the timeout was a little strange, so I'll give you a rough explanation of what happened.
At first, my friend told me that she saw an article that was cueing me, and told me that if I saw it, don't worry, just keep writing if you want to, and forget it if I don't. (This article is a bet with her.)
I didn't take it to heart at first. If I was looking for a cue, I could just cue it. How could I criticize my writing? Normally the author would take care of the comments when they see them. Why should I care so much?
As a result, I actually saw this article later, and I didn't even realize that it was cueing me—laughing to death. Am I the only one who wrote the sexual transformation? Who hasn't read a few 18X articles about selling fish for sex? As a result, I clicked on the comments and found that they were really talking about me. The author allowed the comments to praise her own writing and criticize other people's writings. The readers who said my original BOSS was very low last time (friends may still have the impression that it was the one I pointed out in my article, and also explained that it was not the original big BOSS, but the tool person of the round timeline), madly dissed my article in the comments.
I:? ? ?
I am a person who writes OOC casual articles after losing a bet, so of course I didn't bother to update it, so I casually paused it without mentioning the other person's article or the other person's author's name. ——The reason for the pause has been mentioned. There is no need to click on the other party's author name and title. It would be rude if it leads to questions.
Things should have ended here.
As a result, the other party came over and apologized at length, but I didn't care.
First, this matter is not a matter of controversy. As I said, who hasn't read a few 18X articles about selling fish for sex? This is not the first time for me personally to write about the sex change of Maoyu, and the sex change is a setting, not a plot.
Second, whether the author did it intentionally or unintentionally, it was not a tweet, but a casual reference to another article. Regardless of whether the title of the article and the author's name were mentioned or not, it was inappropriate, not to mention that it also revealed the meaning of "I don't want to update because I bumped into the other person's ideas."
Third, it is impolite to discuss another article in the comments of one article, whether it is to praise or scold.
Fourth, "I said it at the bottom of this article, but I didn't say it below yours. Why do you have to match it?" Presumably some readers will have this mentality. Not to mention that I never mentioned the other party's name or article from beginning to end, but the other person actually said in the comment area, "In order to let the author continue writing, I will diss another article by name." I couldn't grasp the point and felt that I couldn't stop venting after being cueed. Venting is forcing innocent people to do so.
Fifth, I know that wherever there are people, there are disputes, so I hung up and paused to sort out my thoughts. As for the rest of the manuscript, it comes after this incident.
Sixth, let's stop this matter here. At this time, I want to write about DC more.
——————————
I ended up on Raven's complaint center for no apparent reason. What the hell? Wait, I will update tonight. Come on, start the torture! Isn't he a shark? I'll kill you all tonight.
Purpose: I will support your wife
