In the network environment, the way works are used is mainly reflected in the network communication method. Uploading other people's works through the Internet without permission and without payment of compensation is an infringement of other people's copyrights. Article 3 of the "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases Involving Computer Network Copyright Disputes" stipulates: Unless the copyright owner declares that a work that has been published in newspapers or disseminated on the Internet or the network service provider uploading the work is entrusted by the copyright owner to state that it may not be reproduced or excerpted, if the website reprints or excerpts and pays remuneration in accordance with relevant regulations and indicates the source, it does not constitute infringement. However, if the work reprinted or excerpted by the website exceeds the scope of the work reprinted by the relevant newspapers and periodicals, it shall be deemed as infringement. At the same time, in 2006, the Supreme Court revised the above-mentioned "Interpretation". Article 1 stipulates that cases of online copyright infringement disputes shall be under the jurisdiction of the People's Court of the place where the infringement occurred or where the defendant is domiciled. The place of infringement includes the location of network servers, computer terminals and other equipment that carry out the alleged infringement. If it is difficult to determine the place of infringement and the defendant's residence, the location of the computer terminal and other equipment where the plaintiff discovered the infringing content can be regarded as the place of infringement. Therefore, after discovering that their rights and interests have been infringed upon, the copyright owner of an online work has the right to demand compensation from the infringer in accordance with the law.
Please give the author of this article a reply.
In the network environment, the way works are used is mainly reflected in the network communication method. Uploading other people's works through the Internet without permission and without payment of compensation is an infringement of other people's copyrights. Article 3 of the "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases Involving Computer Network Copyright Disputes" stipulates: Unless the copyright owner declares that a work that has been published in newspapers or disseminated on the Internet or the network service provider uploading the work is entrusted by the copyright owner to state that it may not be reproduced or excerpted, if the website reprints or excerpts and pays remuneration in accordance with relevant regulations and indicates the source, it does not constitute infringement. However, if the work reprinted or excerpted by the website exceeds the scope of the work reprinted by the relevant newspapers and periodicals, it shall be deemed as infringement. At the same time, in 2006, the Supreme Court revised the above-mentioned "Interpretation". Article 1 stipulates that cases of online copyright infringement disputes shall be under the jurisdiction of the People's Court of the place where the infringement occurred or where the defendant is domiciled. The place of infringement includes the location of network servers, computer terminals and other equipment that carry out the alleged infringement. If it is difficult to determine the place of infringement and the defendant's residence, the location of the computer terminal and other equipment where the plaintiff discovered the infringing content can be regarded as the place of infringement. Therefore, after discovering that their rights and interests have been infringed upon, the copyright owner of an online work has the right to demand compensation from the infringer in accordance with the law. Please give the author of this article a reply.