Chuanyue is a heroine who travels through time to do missions in various worlds. She hates scum, sympathizes with cannon fodder, and hates evil as much as she hates it. So, with a strong sense of justice, she embarked on the road of fast-traveling to abuse scum without hesitation.
However, she was full of confidence, but she was repeatedly slapped in the face by the original characters in the world, and she suddenly realized——
It turns out that the ending of the story can be different.
Who says that the protagonist who quickly travels through time must be right? Is the person who opposes the protagonist necessarily wrong?
It's not right or wrong, just different positions.
In a novel that opposes the quick travel routine, the protagonist who counterattacks as cannon fodder does not mean that it is absolute justice.
P. S. I just want to write a random joke, so please don't worry about the logical details, I will just write it casually. If you have not checked the information, please do not do research. Just treat it as a parallel world. All history does not count.
The three views may not be correct. After all, in order to slap the face of the character of "Quick Travel Protagonist", the three views are somewhat distorted.
To be honest, I just can't stand the plot trend of the protagonist always acting like a messenger of justice, and those who oppose the protagonist will definitely have a bad ending, so I specially made up the story to slap the face. The heroine is her own character, not targeting anyone.
The heroine in this article has no cp, but there is a hidden cp, and there is a bloody emotional entanglement triangle. Those who are emotionally mysophobic should definitely not enter. This article is purely written for fun. If you have different opinions, please leave a comment silently. Friendly discussions are welcome but no personal criticism will be accepted. Thank you.
