Revised copy one month after completion:
I feel so ashamed after reading some of the comments online.
The original intention of writing "Returning to the World" came from my thoughts on watching current affairs news online and being exposed to society as an intern in the past year. Several chapters in the article respectively address the problems of low morals, juvenile delinquency, and corruption in leading companies, and set up gods higher than humans to solve these problems.
This setting has led to more questions, such as whether humans must have religion to build their own morality, whether society needs high-dimensional power intervention to stay healthy, etc.
The author himself is a theist, but his attitude towards gods and religion is still that "gods are created by man to guide man." Therefore, the plot of this article will never develop into a situation where capital society is replaced by theocratic society. Perhaps this kind of plot is very satisfying for readers, but in reality, this kind of development is set in reverse for at least 500 years.
It is precisely because of this disagreement that the later part of this article collapsed in the eyes of readers. I must say sorry to everyone.
Because when you click on this webpage, you come to read a light-hearted novel, not to discuss social issues with the author. Moreover, due to the author's own experience and lack of writing skills, this article is inadequate in every aspect... Very poor.
The author of this article was very self-centered and ignored the readers' feelings. He still did not repent after being criticized by the readers. It was not until a month after this article was completed and after reading many comments on the Internet that he calmed down and realized his mistake.
In order to remind new readers not to fall into the trap, these thoughts are included in the copy, and readers are asked to choose carefully.
If there are readers who are still willing to click on the first chapter after reading this long paragraph, then please laugh as much as you want when you see the author's shallow thoughts.
Conception: