HP Light Ball Game

Review of "Parselope Nights" Warning to quit: The original work is only over 7,000 words long, but this review is nearly half that. When I wrote nearly two thousand words, I still hadn't finished the outline, and then I slowly realized that I was wasting my time. If you don't have time to watch this, you might as well watch (or rewatch) the original work. ... Of course I still want to write, thank you for your willingness to continue reading. What makes fan fiction different from other novels is that they follow other people's original settings/characters. Lemon Drop, the author of this article, has an amazing grasp of the original HP characters. The best examples, in addition to the article to be discussed, are her original HP reading fan "Reading the Future" and three "A Brief Analysis of the Character of Grindelwald" (the analysis of Gerden is extremely accurate). My understanding of HP's original work, GG, and AD is far less profound than the author's. I am just here as a reader, from a personal perspective, to write down some of my random thoughts after reading. The story setting of "Parselope Nights" is simple and exquisite. After the victory of the war, the British Prime Minister Mr. W was visited by Dumbledore on a snowy night and was entrusted to accompany the latter to meet Grindelwald in prison and ask him a question. The author's writing style is very neat, no nonsense, no cliché, and every description is just right. The full text is narrated from the perspective of Prime Minister Mr. W, and records the wonderful dialogue and exchange between Ge and Deng from the perspective of a third-party witness. It not only reveals the past between Ge and Deng that has been unknown to the world for thirty years, but also proves the clear-cut good and evil positions of both sides that led to the war between the two. Mr. Prime Minister is sober, rational, humorous and empathetic. He decided to trust Dumbledore and agreed to help, but did not follow blindly. He observed Grindelwald using his skillful rhetoric to attack Dumbledore's character, but he did not get carried away. When he saw Dumbledore reveal his privacy and reveal his unspeakable vulnerability, he treated him with respect and compassion without looking directly or judging. Throughout, Mr. W retained independent judgment on what he saw and heard. This is in line with the qualities a country's prime minister should have, and behind it is the author's calm and objective interpretation of the relationship between Ge and Deng. One of the highlights of this article is the presentation of the dialogue between Ge and Deng. Some comments on LJJ lamented that "GG is too good at scolding", which I deeply agree with. The sacrifice of his career and the shackles of prison could not make him wake up. They would only give him time to chew on his frustrations and losses. When Dumbledore, the instigator, came to the door, Grindelwald's accumulated emotions immediately and mercilessly poured into the opponent who had put him in such an unbearable situation. This egocentrist, a master at playing with people's hearts, was extremely calm at first. He knew Dumbledore so well that he knew what the other person wanted as soon as he opened his mouth. Now that it was Dumbledore who wanted something from him, he immediately took the initiative in the conversation. He calmly dangled Dumbledore's needs like a carrot, and while using harsh words to poke Dumbledore's heart mercilessly, he approached Dumbledore step by step, deepening his embarrassment and pain. He completely forgot that he was the one who was unswervingly evil. He put the other person on the altar of the saint and dismembered him carefully. He picked out the dark side and negative emotions that an ordinary person normally has, and added his own imagination and speculation to denounce them one by one, as if he knew his despicable inner world very well. Uninformed people may easily fall into Grindelwald's logical trap, thinking that these words are somehow so reasonable, true and appropriate that Dumbledore can only weakly refute or simply remain silent. But maybe Dumbledore just didn't want to offend Grindelwald before getting the answer, or he was unconsciously trying to evade his former lover - rather than believing that the other party didn't understand him, or that the other party just didn't care about his feelings. Grindelwald is heartless after all. He would never play the trump card in his hand so that his opponent could get what he wanted. Even if he really understood Dumbledore, he would not empathize with him. In order to show that Grindelwald is good at using language to manipulate people's hearts, the author designed a detail: Grindelwald's name for the person he is talking to will change again and again according to the intention of the conversation. For the Prime Minister, even if he is politely addressed as "Sir" at first, it does not prevent him from being called "old fool" and "lower creature" in contempt later. The same is true for Dumbledore. When Grindelwald first seized the initiative, he had a dismissive attitude. He did not call Dumbledore by his name and directly addressed him as "you". He laughed at him when he made a deal with the devil for secrets and praised him as "a great hero, the saint's Albus". He lamented that Dumbledore had become an "old friend" in the past and satirized him. When he was sanctimonious, he called him "Mr. Good", when he lamented that he was miserable and uneasy, he called him "great hero"... When Dumbledore insisted on the original question, Grindelwald still refused to answer directly. Instead, he threw out a very leading rhetorical question with obvious malice, which completely dug out Dumbledore's heartache and made it expressive. However, when Grindelwald's heart-wrenching words succeeded in breaking Dumbledore's heart, his eyes lit up and he declared with excitement that defeated his opponent: "This is all your fault." The words are short, but they are an important turning point. Who would ignore reason and logic and say such irresponsible things? Grindelwald's cold-blooded character as an emotional manipulator was completely exposed. The credibility of his previous speculations and explanations about Dumbledore's past has also been reduced. After easily shirking responsibility, he relied on the beautiful memories he and Dumbledore created to stand on a false moral high ground, pity and hurt himself in a roundabout way, and lamented his lover's betrayal. But Dumbledore regained his composure and no longer retreated weakly or was manipulated into feeling ashamed and guilty - Dumbledore felt sad. This sadness immediately stimulated Grindelwald - he had already lost the magic battle, his dignity was in ruins, and his opponent, who had been ridiculed and blamed harshly by him, stood outside the iron fence as if to show mercy to him. Unable to accept his weak position, he finally showed his true feelings and angrily had a real quarrel with Dumbledore. The two men openly expressed their views on each other, and their conflicts were so intense that they were irreconcilable. After Dumbledore sternly accused him of not knowing how to repent but only knowing how to escape, Grindelwald could only laugh in response. He retreats to his home, "into the deep shadows," voluntarily ending the conversation between the two. Grindelwald would seize Dumbledore's privacy and weaknesses and attack them. Dumbledore must have foreseen it. At that time, Grindelwald had not yet entered Nurmengard and was still being held in the United Front Prison. With a heart destined to be hurt, Dumbledore asked the other party a question that he already knew the answer to shortly after the decisive battle. Why? Is it because there is a slight possibility that Grindelwald will take the blame on himself? Is it to guide Grindelwald to return from the lost path and feel regret and guilt after his career failed? Is it because I have been feeling sorry for my sister's death alone for thirty years, and I want an insider to communicate, explain, or blame me? Is it because a lonely genius still wants to be understood when facing another genius and his former confidant, even if there are countless grievances and grievances between them? This article does not give a clear answer, and this blank space is very clever. There may not be a single and perfect explanation for Dumbledore's motivations, but the information in the article is enough for readers to understand in detail. At the same time, designing Dumbledore's approach of "knowing that he cannot do something but doing it" does not detract from his image, but makes him appear real and noble. He treats people politely and has a bottom line. He is hurt and has the ability to fight back after being hurt. Grindelwald ignored him at first, but he was not humble. He waited for a minute and then left resolutely. Grindelwald's storm of words stung him, but never knocked him down. His retort left Grindelwald speechless - Grindelwald declared that he "didn't intend to roar like a beast in front of you", but Dumbledore finally forced him to roar like a beast (a wonderful echo). In the end, Dumbledore turned defeat into victory. However, this victory is illusory and the character relationships are stagnant. Even though the two cursed each other heartily, they were ultimately unable to convince or control each other. Dumbledore did not get the answer he wanted (the answer may not exist), nor did he see Grindelwald's confession; Grindelwald's emotional manipulation of Dumbledore was invalid, and he had to realize his failure again. So far this article has perfectly demonstrated the character, stance and relationship of the two protagonists, and everything they say and do is on point. If it ends here, the reader has nothing to complain about. However, the author gives a more meaningful ending. Mr. Prime Minister used his keen political acumen to discern Dumbledore's unspoken intentions. Dumbledore has a transcendent status in the wizarding world, and Mr. Prime Minister must be aware of it. It is hard to imagine that such a polite but distant genius would take the initiative to expose his secrets to others, and it is even harder to imagine that he would carelessly choose the target of his exposure. How did two of the greatest wizards of our time part ways, leading to a life-or-death battle that would overturn the world? After witnessing this night, Mr. Prime Minister has a deeper understanding. This understanding made him trust Dumbledore more and endorse him in front of future successors. It also made him more wary of the disastrous consequences that the estrangement between people could lead to. When Dumbledore and the Prime Minister walked out of the prison, he asked the latter if he needed help with his snow-wet coat. Mr. Prime Minister half-heartedly refused—a testament to the estrangement between the two men. Undoubtedly, when one of the Muggle leaders has such an understanding, the estrangement between wizards and Muggles will be less likely to escalate into hostility, and peace will have a chance to be maintained longer. This is the profound meaning of Dumbledore's action. This unique concept adds the finishing touch to the images of Dumbledore and Mr. Prime Minister, and is a sublimation of the entire text. This article was completed when the Communist Party of China came to power. I guess the author who studied American imperialism must have had some feelings in mind when he wrote the article. Today, nearly four years later, the practical significance of this article still exists. Dissent among different races has become even more acute, and the world situation has become more turbulent. Even if there is a savior or leader who can turn the tide, it is ultimately us who face the consequences and take responsibility. "Don't give up hope." This review is dedicated to the author lemon drop. Thank you for writing such a great GGAD fanfic. I know that you are being coerced by the COVID-19 epidemic and reality, and are forced to experience some dark moments full of dissatisfaction and uncertainty. I wish you all the best and all the best.

What I wanted to find before clicking into the comment area was to find an answer: was the last paragraph a fantasy of GG, or was AD really here? Did the dead person refer to Ariana, Dumbledore, or others. But after I clicked in, I had a flash of inspiration and suddenly realized: these are not important. Words, sentences, and stories are created by the creator, and then they come to life and begin to develop on their own. To be disrespectful, it doesn't matter what the author was thinking when she wrote it. After all, what she wrote was vague, and after publishing, they came alive. They have had various interpretations, stories, and appearances in the second or even third creation - the charm of fandom. What readers need is to understand this beauty and give them new life. Finally, after I type this confusing and irreverent sentence, please allow me to express my gratitude to the author: I have lost the desire to express myself for a long time, and several articles in this book inspired me to type this paragraph and publish it. I think I'll get back to my passion for expressive communication and try my hand at fandom, thank you.

Oh my god I went to Taobao specifically to look for it. Not found Suddenly I realized this was an update from four years ago....

OMG this chapter was great. It's unimaginable that lemon's style of imitating Churchill's diary can be so similar... (I imagined the image of Mr. W throughout the entire process of Darkest Hour, aka the fat version of Sirius)

I would like to ask the author that in the five times they mentioned love and once they didn't, Albus thought he was in love with Gellert but he didn't mean that Albus didn't love Gellert in this article? I also hope other book friends can help answer the question. Never Look Back and Five Times left a deep impression on me. Is there love between Gellert and Albus in Never Look Back? Hope the answer is available, thank you

I! Look! Arrive! Got it! Varied! What! This article actually has an extra chapter... I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the update notification, QAQ, and it was still 5+1... This article is so well written. Personally, I think GGAD emotions are like this! Lost in love and illusion, use and true love, in the end it makes you want to use a time turner to go back decades and start over again... (Wait, it seems that using a time turner is useless) I have read articles describing GGAD's emotions that are extremely thick and sweet.

This article is really great. Whether it is the description of gg and ad or the confrontation between the two. Gg's language is like a sharp and shiny thorn, a sharp spear that penetrates the prison cell. When I read, my brain was nailed to the wall by it. But to be honest, I can understand what gg said, and some of it has been fulfilled in the later movies. The difference between ad and him is probably that he is more tolerant, weaker, and able to understand love better. In other words, he should be more able to reconcile with the world.

Hiahiahia Although I want to say that GG regrets it, it is of no use. Reaching the last part of the original story, all I can think about is, damn, it was a ghostly love story of youth (no.

During the duel, Harry also suggested that Voldemort try to repent. What about the master and apprentice who always care about other people's souls?

The person you started with has no obligation to accompany you. This is not a betrayal. But it can also serve as a betrayal.

GG can use the Cruciatus Curse on his lover's brother, and then walk away after the accident. How much true love does he have for AD, or how much love does he have in his heart? His moral character is not good.

He who understands the meaning of life can understand peace. Great!

After 10 years, I realized that there was no hope.

What did I see!!! This article actually has a new chapter! So sad, so sad QAQ I never have and don't care how you use it. That's love. The sacrifices made for unrequited love are much greater than the sacrifices made for two lovers.

While having a distinctive personal style, Lemon has a very deep understanding of character relationships, which is very amazing.

When will customization be reopened? I'm crying.

"Poke it on you and it will keep you out of the rain and keep you warm." Magic is so amazing... This sentence made me feel warm.

I don't understand what the first issue of TT Dada GA means... Where can I receive this copy? I can't find it on Shui Shifang Dada's Weibo.

Woo hoo hoo in my lifetime... GG finally repented. A late confession is better than never.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I feel that facing GGAD, the girls downstairs have said everything I want to say, and I can only continue to hold my face in my hands and scream for another minute! ! ! !

The principal came to see him because he actually wanted to try and see if he could finally change his mind... Sigh.

The blank past between them is so bleak yet so glorious... How can people not be fascinated by such a tragedy? No amount of pen and ink can describe the past. I will stand on GGAD for the rest of my life [comparison] to express my gratitude to the author.

Favorite GGAD short story

GG... Is so good at scolding...

It's very interesting, whether it's the main text or the extras

When I read it, I felt like my whole body was shaking. The big language is really contagious. After reading it, I feel like I have thousands of words in my heart but I don't know what to say. I wrote down everything I could say. Sad to read this story. I am so happy that I want to cry because I can read this story.

I was jet-lagged, so I bought it and wanted to collect it. I ordered a copy of ggad and a book of Faith, and then they were sent to me as Faith... Because my mother used to collect the collection for me, I just found out now...

Ningda asked for permission to authorize QAQ... I would like to use the light ball setting and round table reading mode to describe the matter. Is it possible to use the reading style...

Did you miss this chapter somewhere? I feel like I have seen it before...

Lemon is great Good update