First of all, those who came from HJJ to LJJ to give negative scores and make malicious comments, you win!
Public opinion makes gold, but accumulation destroys bones! Originally it was just words, but now I have realized it!
Also: I hope you will one day write your own articles in the future!
Secondly, HJJ's post has been deleted (I applied for restoration, but the possibility of restoration is unlikely, so I can only summarize it here). The reason is that the main text was not posted. However, if someone had been more careful before the post was deleted, they would have found that the total number of posts on the serial version of the article was one more than the number of posts in the article. I posted the main text and then replied to the message. The main reason at that time was that I could not bear the fact that someone not only made malicious comments about HJJ, but also came to LJJ to give negative marks.
The reason for most malicious comments is that the author said that two points must be given... I can only feel helpless for these statements that are taken out of context (I said "please don't" and "preferably not" rather than must)... In my reply at noon today, I explained that it was counterproductive and getting worse. In this regard, I can only say: Allow readers to throw bricks at will while reading the article, smashing the author's head and blood, but the author is not allowed to build a floor to protect himself before writing the article? Rating and commenting are the readers' freedom, and the author cannot interfere with it. But in order to be able to update the article quietly in the future, wouldn't it be okay to explain a few words in advance before posting? Is it worth pursuing you so fiercely?
Finally, when I saw a long list of malicious comments with only a few people defending the author, as an author, to be honest, it was really chilling... I regretted opening the second part of HJJ...
Above.
2012.5.28 21:00
Intention: