Lin Zhixia, 32 years old, was an associate professor of economics at a top 2 university in China. Before his death, he was correcting a student's rubbish graduation thesis. He just wrote a comment: It is recommended to postpone graduation! ! .
Then she died suddenly.
When I opened my eyes again, I entered a scientific research world where "paper = life span".
Here, publishing a paper will increase your life, rejecting a manuscript will deduct your life, and withdrawing a manuscript will directly lead to cremation.
Biochemistry and environmental materials are rolled into purgatory, the School of Computer Science is cultivating with GPUs on their backs, and no one dares to reject the theoretical physics boss because no one understands it. Only two lines of blood are hung on the door of the School of Economics:
Cherish life and stay away from submissions.
Economists, naked investing is prohibited.
Lin Zhixia sneered.
Isn't it just about publishing a paper?
I rushed to write an article "Research on the Relationship between Residents' Consumption Propensity and Income Structure" overnight, and click submit with confidence.
Three seconds later.
System reply:
Rejection.
The reasons are as follows:
1. The model is simple.
2. The conclusion is boring.
3. The data looks like it was compiled.
4. The author seems to mistakenly believe that describing reality counts as research.
5. It is recommended to switch to popular science books.
Contribution value -50.
Lin Zhixia felt dizzy on the spot, her bracelet turned red, and a handful of her hair fell out.
Dean Wang Jianguo skillfully took out the contribution value nutrient solution and poured it into her mouth:
"Don't be afraid, it's the same for the first rejection. Some people vomit blood, some lose their hair, but your injury is considered a minor injury."
Lin Zhixia: "..."
Very good.
She originally just wanted to publish a paper.
Now she wants to do one thing:
Stay alive.
Purpose: To complain in the academic circle
