After the company fully enabled algorithmic performance, ordinary operations Lin Zhi was given a zero score by the system. She originally thought it was just a misjudgment, but when she appealed, checked logs, looked through old weekly reports, and chased clues left by her predecessors, she discovered that the so-called AI assessment was never a neutral tool, but a set of rules for screening people for management. The people who are put into the observation pool, the people who are retained, the contributions that will not be recorded, and the values that are renamed all have the same choice hidden behind them. What she wanted to get back was just an explanation at first, but later turned into a search for systems, rules and organizational biases.
Intention: When technology is packaged as neutral rules, it is even more necessary to ask who is defining value, who is allowed to explain, and who is quietly abandoned. What really deserves to be seen is not just the beautiful results, but also the complex labor that keeps reality running but is often not recorded.