Recommended preview: "Becoming My Mother's Sister in the 1970s"
Xie Zhiheng and her boyfriend Lu Zhou broke up because of different ambitions. Before leaving, they exhausted their ammunition and fired at each other's weak spots:
The other party said: "You are just a stinking stone in the pit, and you will definitely fall into trouble in the future!"
Xie Zhiheng hit back: "You're a piece of trash waiting to die. Just wait until you see me doing somersaults at your funeral!"
Turning around, the two of them traveled back to the countryside decades ago.
At this time, every household was too poor to wear a pair of underpants. Xie Zhiheng was an orphan who was coveted, and Lu Zhou was one of a family of six bachelors. They both faced the same predicament.
Either accept the arrangement and marry a stranger and spend the whole life together at a tender age, or cooperate and go their own ways in the future.
On the wedding night, the two enemies met again.
Xie Zhiheng: "... Hello."
Lu Zhou: "... Young woman."
A cynical young female protagonist (Xie Zhiheng) who is passionate about her career and a cunning and cunning male protagonist (Lu Zhou) who only wants to be messed up.
The female protagonist will be promoted along the way, but she will also suffer setbacks. The male protagonist is the best assistant.
*Deposited on 2025.12.18
*In order to facilitate the fictitious 1980s, there is not much research. Even the dynasties are all made up for convenience. So if you see conflicting content, it is because the author is illiterate and cannot write, okay?
*I wrote this article because I was excited about eating melons. My parents are short-tempered and I mainly want to make up my own bushi.
*The lives of the male and female protagonists are the main line, but because it is a short group portrait of parents, other people will also describe it, and if it is too much, it will be marked.
Intention: I will move forward courageously
Reader comments
The comparison here is actually not quite right. At least the case in the heroine's previous life required people like her to persist. Her original decision was not wrong. If there were less such stubborn people in the world, it would be worse. Only the existence of such people can remind those sins and what justice is.
If it is necessary to write that the heroine is aware of the multi-faceted nature of the matter and needs to look at it from multiple angles, then she should not arrange for her to encounter that case in her previous life, because that case is irreversible.
The comparison here is actually not quite right. At least the case in the heroine's previous life required people like her to persist. Her original decision was not wrong. If there were less such stubborn people in the world, it would be worse. Only the existence of such people can remind those sins and what justice is. If it is necessary to write that the heroine is aware of the multi-faceted nature of the matter and needs to look at it from multiple angles, then she should not arrange for her to encounter that case in her previous life, because that case is irreversible.
It's very well written, keep it up