A criminal defense attorney faces four difficult criminal cases. The difficulty in these cases does not lie in the complexity and doubts of the case, but in the fierce collision between legal rationality and human common sense. Here, there is no simple confrontation between good and evil, only excusable mistakes and cold and harsh regulations; there are no arrogant criminals, only ordinary people who are teased by fate and the system. To defend them is to embark on the most difficult road: not to refute the indisputable facts, but to argue about the definition of "crime"; not to ask for forgiveness, but to assert rights; not only to convince the judge, but also to protect the foundation on which the legal net exists - the trust of citizens in it. This work raises a fundamental question: What is the ultimate purpose of law? Is it to be a beacon that can illuminate everyone in trouble, or is it to be a beacon that only guides those who have never taken a wrong step?
Purpose: fairness and justice