During the Chongzhen period, natural disasters continued, the land was thousands of miles away, and people were eating each other!
Did you know that what the common people faced was dendrobium noodles, big fights in and small fights, silver for corvee, silver for paving, silver for assistance, silver for horse prices, silver for city repairs, silver for banknotes...
And this is just the tip of the iceberg of miscellaneous taxes to be paid.
Add in the 50% to 70% rent, will the people have a way to survive?
The officials, gentry, and clans are full of oil, and there are droughts, floods, locusts, plagues, hailstorms, and snowstorms every year, endlessly.
There are rebels inside and Tatars raiding the border outside. Can the people have any hope?
So Shen Xiuyuan raised the hammer and sickle.
"Let these decadent and reactionary feudal bureaucratic landlords have a taste of the iron fist from his people's grandfather!"
Establish base areas, conquer landlords, divide fields, develop industry, and cultivate an army with faith...
In May of the second year of Chongzhen, Shen Xiuyuan walked out of Yan'an City and began to build an era belonging to the people!
Reader comments
The extra star is because the direction is good, but the poor writing has the opposite effect.
My evaluation is that it is a small poison that lasts (but the small poisons stack up to cause high damage). (1 Protagonist is groveling) (The lady from 2,000 households (not good people) is a pure-bred good person, which is outrageous.)
The writing style of novels should be exaggeration, not amplification. This is a novel! For example, when talking about someone's poverty, just say "poor" and describe the furnishings of the family's four-walled room. Why should we go into detail about someone's latrine? (Rebuttal content: Xiaodu 1)
For another example, assuming that a place has 95% evil and 5% good, it is undoubtedly absurd to try to describe that good and draw the conclusion that the place is good. Besides, it's true that this character setting is dramatic, but you... 6.
The extra star is because the direction is good, but the poor writing has the opposite effect. My evaluation is that it is a small poison that lasts (but the small poisons stack up to cause high damage). (1 Protagonist is groveling) (The lady from 2,000 households (not good people) is a pure-bred good person, which is outrageous.) The writing style of novels should be exaggeration, not amplification. This is a novel! For example, when talking about someone's poverty, just say "poor" and describe the furnishings of the family's four-walled room. Why should we go into detail about someone's latrine? (Rebuttal content: Xiaodu 1) For another example, assuming that a place has 95% evil and 5% good, it is undoubtedly absurd to try to describe that good and draw the conclusion that the place is good. Besides, it's true that this character setting is dramatic, but you... 6.
It looks ok so far, please speed up the update.