Lin Che was just a trainee power engineer on the border transport ship.
Until the main reactor shuts down, the backup power supply fails, and the entire ship begins to plummet toward the gas giant.
The captain asked him how long he could hold on.
He said: "Twelve hours of life support and three minutes of thrusters."
"Then can we still be saved?"
Lin Che looked at the energy lines all over the starship, connecting the cargo bay, lighting, shields and all backup batteries to the same circuit.
"I don't know if he can be saved."
"But the ship's power has not been exhausted yet."
Starting from a transport ship that was on the verge of being scrapped, he repaired the remaining ship, built a shipyard, and built a fleet.
Many years later, when the entire human civilization fell into darkness, people finally realized:
The most important thing is never who has the most powerful weapon.
But who can light up the stars again.
Reader comments
Aha, since no one has commented, let me go first. The content is pretty good so far. There are very few books of this type, and this one is one of the better ones. The protagonist does not have any special hooks (the protagonist's hooks are very consistent with the content, and most of the time the protagonist helps to solve the problem, relying on personal ability), and there is no protagonist who completes everything by himself. The brainless plot that revolves around the protagonist is the result of everyone's cooperation. Everyone plays their own role, and it feels like a group portrait. However, there are also some problems that the author has used. There are a large number of short sentences, many of which can be combined with each other. For example, in the description of the water accumulation in the mine tunnel, you can combine "metal dust floating" with "water accumulation on the ground", "detection of accumulated water" and "corrosive", and combine these similar short sentences in the article. Merge, so that the perception will be better. Even if you plan to write in a short-sentence style, it is better to merge unnecessary short sentences. Also, the "Chapter xx..." That appears in the article will greatly affect the perception (sad). If it is out of call For the demand of back, it is not a good idea to adopt this method. For example, the "according to the power outage sequence in Chapter 39" that appears in Chapter 46 can be changed to "according to the priority of the power supply table." If you really want to show the connection between the back and the back, you can add a bracket at the end of the paragraph "(The power supply table is from Chapter 39)", but it is really unnecessary. If we talk about the details, some places are confusing, and some places are not coherent. The above only represents my humble opinion, and I hope you, the author, can adopt some of its useful features ;-)
Aha, since no one has commented, let me go first. The content is pretty good so far. There are very few books of this type, and this one is one of the better ones. The protagonist does not have any special hooks (the protagonist's hooks are very consistent with the content, and most of the time the protagonist helps to solve the problem, relying on personal ability), and there is no protagonist who completes everything by himself. The brainless plot that revolves around the protagonist is the result of everyone's cooperation. Everyone plays their own role, and it feels like a group portrait. However, there are also some problems that the author has used. There are a large number of short sentences, many of which can be combined with each other. For example, in the description of the water accumulation in the mine tunnel, you can combine "metal dust floating" with "water accumulation on the ground", "detection of accumulated water" and "corrosive", and combine these similar short sentences in the article. Merge, so that the perception will be better. Even if you plan to write in a short-sentence style, it is better to merge unnecessary short sentences. Also, the "Chapter xx..." That appears in the article will greatly affect the perception (sad). If it is out of call For the demand of back, it is not a good idea to adopt this method. For example, the "according to the power outage sequence in Chapter 39" that appears in Chapter 46 can be changed to "according to the priority of the power supply table." If you really want to show the connection between the back and the back, you can add a bracket at the end of the paragraph "(The power supply table is from Chapter 39)", but it is really unnecessary. If we talk about the details, some places are confusing, and some places are not coherent. The above only represents my humble opinion, and I hope you, the author, can adopt some of its useful features ;-)