Gotham: I Kill the Joker, Superman Takes the Blame

I can only say that it's not bad. The protagonist is invincible. Anyway, the system rewards you when you encounter someone you can't beat, and then the protagonist becomes invincible again. Then the protagonist is in a state of having fun and relaxing. It looks good from the front, but for this kind of invincible style, it needs to be written based on the point of having fun! If the writing is not good later, not many people will read it. This kind of invincible flow may look good in the early stage, but it may feel boring in the later stage. It depends on how the author writes later, right?

Cheers, author [sending my heartfelt wishes], and I was wondering why there are so many saintly passages in novels nowadays, after seeing the comments. . .

I don't know why so many people like Madonna novels. I don't like reading Madonna novels, but in reality I like Madonna, because I am a bad person. If my enemy is a Madonna, that would be really good for me, but in novels, I don't like Madonna novels. You Madonnas will definitely not care if you meet me and take advantage of me in reality.

How much resentment does it take to pull off this thing? [What]

After defeating Superman, he becomes bored. He is dominated by power and is essentially a powerful little bastard.

Cool article, but a little bit AI flavor

Not Holy Mother, very wonderful

It's hard to imagine how resentful the author was when he wrote this thing. If he let himself go, he would be 😏🍉🍉🍉

Yes, I love not eating beef!

Come on, come on, come on