The National Games Game Starts with Wang Zhaojun, the King

It's a single change, the writing is excellent, the descriptions of women's clothing and bodies are full, and the descriptions of female abduction are zero. Guoyun plays Wang Zhaojun and starts killing. The black soldier in the beginning is indeed a bit poisonous. Although it is not particularly dark, it is indeed a bit outrageous to portray the King of Soldiers as a pervert, because if he really has this kind of character, he will never become the King of Soldiers because of his character flaws. Later, I gradually recovered from it, from being aroused by seeing sex to risking my life to protect it. Although this poisonous point cannot be ignored, other aspects are still ok. As a transformation novel, the description of the female body is full of interest, and the description of the battle scene is also full of interest. It can be said that the fighting is really exciting. The author was also Wang Zhaojun in the previous book. Will the characters in this book change? Should I change my clothes and abilities without changing my face, or should I just change my body? Overall, it's okay, especially the story about a child's abuse, the plot is enjoyable to watch, and the writing is worth collecting.

I see that there is no poisonous point in this article. If there is a poisonous point in The King of Soldiers, there is actually no such thing. I said that after other readers raised questions after reading it, the author himself improved the content, so there should be no such thing. If there was one, this book review should have received comments about the author's content and improvement, and the reader's review that criticized the poisonous points of the King of Soldiers has not been deleted, which means that the author has not improved the original content. The King of Soldiers has a worthy, "obscene giggle". Is there anything insulting about this? And I read the content too quickly, and I didn't hear that sentence clearly, but that sentence should be a joking description. Book reviews should be fair and dual-sided. It is not about your own thoughts and then locking them up. There must be room for development, and it may be developed in other directions. When posting a book review, you must clearly remember and think about what kind of personality and group of people will be affected after posting it, in case there are some people who only think about it. I read book reviews without looking at the content of the novel, but when I see you mentioning toxic points (referring to exaggerated descriptions), he doesn't check to see if he has any. Instead, he directly reads the book review. When he sees it, he stops reading the book. This affects the browsing rate and is easy to cause controversy with your content. This book currently has no toxic points. I don't know what will happen in the future. The above is a suggestion I made to a reader's book review, and a correction he issued for inappropriate content. Let's talk about the advantages of this book: 1. Some authors update 10,000 words, but I don't know if this applies to every subsequent article. But judging from the current content, they are more diligent and update a lot of words. 2. The author's descriptions contain advanced vocabulary and are easy to understand. The descriptions do not make any nonsense. The appearance, language and demeanor are all very accurate, as are the fighting scenes. Flaws in this book: The character levels are inconsistent in several passages. Or maybe the character's thinking at the time was a bit unreasonable, a bit affecting the personality and morality, and the three views were incorrect. Of course, my description may be exaggerated, but I don't think so. Finally, I am not a professional, I am just a relatively ordinary student. After reading the novel, I didn't have any advanced vocabulary and didn't know how to use some ordinary descriptions. They just indicated the situation of the book. Maybe I had many questions, such as what words and descriptions were inconsistent with the content of the novel, and I left out the content. In other words, the span of words is relatively large, but if you find that you can reply to me under this book review, please respect that person and don't directly launch a verbal attack if you find there is a problem.

@ Shan Baiyue