Everyone Survives on Deserted Islands, and I Can Upgrade the Rewards

Being ruthless and ruthless, but still being steady, and still being the sixth person, this is what is courageous among dogs. It is not the pure dogma in sheep's clothing of some authors, which is not worth mentioning at all, or it is said that it is doggy, and the result is that it keeps causing trouble, but it is actually courageous.

This book is definitely more than 5.5 Points. The world is well created and the characters are good. The male protagonist is indeed very self-interested and smart. Everything he does is motivated by his own interests. The introduction to the book I read before said that the protagonist is extremely selfish and self-interested, but later it developed into a group portrait. This book is very good. The protagonist is very calm and is the most suitable person to survive in this kind of place. I hope the author can update 10,000 times a day. I can't get enough.

The story is really well written. Although there are occasional small flaws, the flaws are not concealed. Overall, the logical thinking is more rigorous, and the storyline has many breakthroughs. It is not an old routine, which reflects the author's innovation. After Chapter 55, it's a bit crotch-stretching

Yes, at least the killing is decisive, the protagonist's style and behavior are unified, there is no left-brain and left-brain fighting, and there is no female protagonist who appears to be useless. It's really cool, it's delicious. In fact, the protagonist really doesn't kill people mindlessly and is driven by profit. But who is not like this in the world of survival? The protagonist is just the winner, so it seems that the protagonist kills more people. That's just because the losers are weak, but it doesn't mean they are innocent.

Not bad, not bad, stable mentality, add a little bit to open the box and it won't be annoying.

It looks fine, but the digital data is wrong.

Overall it's well written, but it's too difficult to survive. The survivors were not wiped out, which is obviously not very scientific...

It's pretty, I think it's pretty I think it has a female protagonist tendency, but I'm not sure if there is a female protagonist, and it can't be considered a lone wolf. I don't think it looks very good. Then the talent is the same as none, I feel like I have no sense of existence emm The following is the answer I got from Doubao after searching a lot and asking about it: - According to the standard of clinical "antisocial personality disorder", there are many conflicts between personality and behavior, and the writing is not consistent with the real antisocial personality; - According to the standard of "cold, rational, self-interested and lone wolf", the logic of the character's behavior is smooth and not broken; - The essence of all conflicts is the mismatch between the label "antisocial" and the characters actually created by the author

It's okay. I support it. The main reason is that the character of the protagonist is not vicious and looks good. He is indeed ruthless. I re-read the synopsis, and I don't know if it means there is no female protagonist, but I hope so. It is suggested that the author can put some tags at the beginning, such as [cruel], [lone wolf], etc., Which will be more conducive to attracting attention.

It's good to watch and updated quickly. If you want to survive, don't forget the Holy Mother.