
Sky Screen: The Only Thing That Never Changes Is Power
天幕:永远不变的只有权力
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 359k Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Historical High-Concept
- Updated
- 2mo ago
- Source
- Fanqie
Synopsis
165Chapters
668Reads
6.7Score
111Shelves
98Listens
59.7kReads · all time
More by this author
In booklists 2
Looking for Qin Dynasty Stories With Highly Intelligent Characters. Don't Write the King of Qin Like an Idiot
Ying Zheng is ruthless and shrewd in politics. Don't make it seem like he's treating the protagonist like some immortal.
336Books5MViews2dUpdated
Historical Novels with a Sky Screen, Logical Arguments, and More Than Just Personal Opinions
I want something like "The Sky Screen: The Accidental and the Inevitable in History".
240Books1MViews11dUpdated
Reader comments 40
Translated by Google Translate















This is the first book that evaluates and analyzes history relatively objectively. It has its own ideas and can be expressed logically and clearly. In fact, I have long felt that history books are not that trustworthy at all. But because of limited knowledge and lack of knowledge, I have no motivation to find answers. So in the past, when discussing problems with people, I talked about ideas and answers, but could not give the process in between. This book currently seems to be in line with my cognition. It is relatively objective. I don't know if it is right because my knowledge is limited. But at least it can give those guys who believe in history books a brand new perspective. Take a look at the way those of us look at historical records. In other words, I am a rationalist and never like to deify any historical figures. I do not deny the achievements, but I never like those records and words that beautify and deify. I am even very disgusted. And I like to look at all issues rationally. If you repeat historical records without having your own ideas, I think you are confused. Why don't I go read a history book? Naturally, there is an official endorsement. It is generally correct. The official has screened it for us once. At least it has a certain degree of credibility. It is useless to write it as a novel and let me read it again. It is mixed with a lot of personal stuff. It is said that everyone discussed the results together and it is all the opinion of one family. Don't be too biased. History is full of accidents and inevitabilities. One is indispensable. Either deny accidents or deny inevitability. Why choose one here? Shouldn't we admit that chance is chance and that necessity is necessity? So this novel is very good so far. If you want to read it, add it to your bookshelf. The update may not be stable because it requires a lot of knowledge base and logical analysis. Then it needs to be written in words and the logic is smooth. It can be said that it is not easy. People who eat fast food may not be able to stand it.
I like the author's point of view very much. I won't say whether it is right or wrong, but this book really made me think. The development of history can also be justified. If history is written by the victors, it will be tampered with or distorted. This novel puts you in the perspective of the other party to think about the problem and analyze the reasons. Every time I read the wonderful points, I suddenly understand. The reason why I did this is very consistent with the wisdom of the ancient people in my mind. The ancient people just had the limitations of the times, which does not mean they are stupid. On the contrary, they are smarter than us modern people. The ancient officialdom was full of calculations when facing the crisis of annihilating the nine tribes. Compared with them, we have degenerated. It turns out that the book I read was also written by you. No wonder I found the views very to my liking. It was about the contingency and inevitability of history in that book. I was wondering why Qin Shihuang's views were so familiar.
As the author said, there are many private goods, and different angles have been changed, but the core is still the interest angle. However, as mentioned earlier, the emperor and his son have a good relationship. If you like it, you can take a look. I only see why Zhao Gao can win.
Very good, I learned something. I just want to make a few comments. The discussion process was a little watery. I can refine it a little more and leave a little more blank space. Very much looking forward to the follow-up!
Very good, Tianmuwen is the best
I have read two books by this author. Different interpretations of history. The more I read, the more I like it. The more I understand history, the more I like it. It's really magical.
Come on, I suddenly became enlightened after reading this, it's a very novel idea
It's a good angle. It's novel, and I can't say it's novel. It's just that it doesn't write about those "history" that seem completely illogical at first glance, but everyone knows. Regarding the system, the statement "Thousands of years of road comes to an end" is probably a bit of face saved by the author. My understanding is that in the next few thousand years, reincarnations of power will continue to change. But in the future, a group of ideal people invented a time machine. Although they are still in reincarnation, they have the ability to use their current powerful technology to force the previously weak ancestors to take the path out of reincarnation. That is the path we have now and were originally going to take.
Where are people? Why aren't there any comments? Come out and say a few words. Be careful, the net will be broken if the fish is not big enough.
Awesome! Some of the ideas in your book are very similar to my thoughts. It's just that I don't have writing skills like yours. I once wanted to write a similar novel about the evolution of ancient power and how human nature has never changed. Then I gave up after trying it. I forgot how to write many words. You also need to look it up in a dictionary. 🤭🤭🤭