"Ding! System binding successful."
Yes, it was me who shouted. I am a void tentacle monster that has lived for three thousand years and is about to fall apart due to hunger. I pretend to be a golden finger and bind an emotionally exhausted social animal.
I just want him to have more joy, anger, sorrow, and joy, and to bear fruits of his soul, so that I can have a full meal.
But he just didn't follow the script. He learned to say no, to fight, to write poetry, and to make way for a stray cat. He even said "thank you" into the air.
The fruit was finally ripe and more beautiful than any I had seen in three thousand years.
But I didn't reach out for a long time.
It turns out that the host was not captured from the very beginning.
Reader comments
This book has a good idea. It can be seen that the author wrote it based on his own ideas and has his own understanding of life. However, as a reader, the first priority is to judge and consider whether the book is good or not. I haven't read much yet, but there are two points to say. The first point is the disguise of high-dimensional creatures. It directly calls itself an emotion collection system and only collects the emotions of the host. This itself makes people feel that it has some intention and is easy to think of. A race that survives by sucking the emotions of the host; the second point is the confirmation of the system. Well, when I saw a reader post the idea that the creature was a system elf, the author was stunned. In fact, for old bookworms, systems that are only machine-based or have personality are common. Of course, it can be understood that the protagonist is a person who has not been exposed to novels since he was a child, or he has not been exposed to novels under the influence of the people around him until he becomes a social animal. , I have only read a few books, and only have preliminary mechanized impressions. There is actually no problem with this. The main reason is that the author can basically judge that he has an outline now, at least an ideological outline. And there, it can be basically inferred that the author has wavered in his outline and has the idea of not wanting to write. This is not a big problem in itself, but in terms of perception in the end, if there were not so many AI articles nowadays, this book should be It is in the lower middle position, and currently it is in the middle. It can be seen in the article what the author wants to write, but it can also be seen that the author just wants to write what he wants to write. It does not mean that writing a novel must please readers, but one of the charms of novels is to show the stories they want to write to more people and bring more things to others. This may not be the ultimate goal of everyone who wants to write novels, but unilateral output is almost meaningless no matter how you say it.
This book has a good idea. It can be seen that the author wrote it based on his own ideas and has his own understanding of life. However, as a reader, the first priority is to judge and consider whether the book is good or not. I haven't read much yet, but there are two points to say. The first point is the disguise of high-dimensional creatures. It directly calls itself an emotion collection system and only collects the emotions of the host. This itself makes people feel that it has some intention and is easy to think of. A race that survives by sucking the emotions of the host; the second point is the confirmation of the system. Well, when I saw a reader post the idea that the creature was a system elf, the author was stunned. In fact, for old bookworms, systems that are only machine-based or have personality are common. Of course, it can be understood that the protagonist is a person who has not been exposed to novels since he was a child, or he has not been exposed to novels under the influence of the people around him until he becomes a social animal. , I have only read a few books, and only have preliminary mechanized impressions. There is actually no problem with this. The main reason is that the author can basically judge that he has an outline now, at least an ideological outline. And there, it can be basically inferred that the author has wavered in his outline and has the idea of not wanting to write. This is not a big problem in itself, but in terms of perception in the end, if there were not so many AI articles nowadays, this book should be It is in the lower middle position, and currently it is in the middle. It can be seen in the article what the author wants to write, but it can also be seen that the author just wants to write what he wants to write. It does not mean that writing a novel must please readers, but one of the charms of novels is to show the stories they want to write to more people and bring more things to others. This may not be the ultimate goal of everyone who wants to write novels, but unilateral output is almost meaningless no matter how you say it.
I quite like it, good review