(No system + Struggle for hegemony + Reform)
"Guizi, are you going to rebel?" Yuan Shao was furious
"Father, you are three times more powerful than Cao Cao, yet you were defeated miserably in the Battle of Guandu. You are old!" Yuan Wen looked at the gray-haired Yuan Shao.
"Treason! You actually took advantage of the war between Gu and Cao Cao to attack Gu's Yecheng?"
"Father, you are not in good health, and it is time to take care of yourself! From now on, I will fight the battles you dare not fight, and I will kill the people you dare not kill!"
Yuan Shao spat out a mouthful of blood.
"By the way, I will also send you your three useless legitimate sons. Aren't you a legitimate legitimate concubine? Let them support you in your old age from now on!"
"You rebellious son! Cao Cao used the emperor to control the princes, but you used the emperor to control Hebei!"
Many years later, when the world was unified, Yuan Shao looked at Cao Cao, Liu Bei, Sun Quan and others with mixed feelings, "Meng De, Xuande... I didn't expect that we would meet again!"
Several people smiled bitterly.
A few years later, the entire Han Dynasty was full of roaring trains and cars. Merchant ships carried all kinds of rare commodities sold all over the world. Industry and commerce were prosperous as never before. Crops such as potatoes, sweet potatoes, and corn were also recovered. People no longer sold their sons and daughters for a bite to eat. At this moment, Yuan Shao may have gradually let go...
Reader comments
It's well written, but the reasoning in Chapter 10 is wrong.
Reasoning process
Known conditions:
1. Three people: A, B, and C, one is the murderer and two are innocent;
2. A: I did not kill anyone; B: A did not kill anyone; C: B did not kill anyone;
3. Only one person told the truth and the other two lied.
Scenario 1: Suppose A tells the truth (A is not guilty)
- Jia Zhen → Jia did not kill anyone
- If B says "A has not killed", which is consistent with A, then B is also telling the truth.
At this time, A and B are telling the truth, which violates "only one person is telling the truth" and is not valid.
Situation 2: Suppose B tells the truth (A is not guilty)
- Yizhen → A did not kill anyone
- A said "I didn't kill", which is also true.
A and B are both true, but do not meet the conditions and are not established.
Scenario 3: Suppose C tells the truth (B is not guilty)
There is only one truth from C, and both A and B must be lies:
1. A is a lie → A killed someone;
2. B is a lie → "A did not kill" is false, proving that A killed someone;
3. C tells the truth: B did not kill, which means that only A is the murderer. There is no contradiction.
Conclusion
A is the murderer
See Chapter 174: I have seen before that a son of Cao Cao broke up because he prevented his father from slaughtering the city, and then seized the territory of Xuzhou and Yuan Shu. The civilians elected village chiefs, held imperial examinations, and opened debating halls. The plots are very similar [face covering]. The difference is that the men in black robes united with Cao Cao and Liu Sun to fight against him. Liu failed many times to unite Sun and foreigners and add plague attacks. I don't know if I learned something from it?
Very well written, as always, five stars.
Well written, good work, energetic, no loss of status. Although I chose three harems, most of them are about foreign wars, which is good. It's not like some brainless and cool articles, which spend more than ten chapters all day long lingering with women [eating melon] [eating melon] [eating melon]
This novel not only contains strategies and wars, but also the late Eastern Han Dynasty from a civilian perspective.
I can read this novel and feel so healed that even if I read it again, I may not feel bored. It is really good and I like to read it. If I can choose to time travel, I hope to be able to travel to this era.
The rating shouldn't be so low, I personally think it's pretty good
Although it's not perfect, it's worth watching General🖖😭🖖
The first ten or so chapters were not very good, but the later chapters got better and better.
Well written. I can read it. The author has done a great job.
There has to be someone writing about the Three Kingdoms. This perspective is not bad.
This is a Three Kingdoms-themed novel worth reading.
The writing is good, the design is reasonable, there are no poisonous points, and it is worth a read.
It looks okay so far
It's okay, I can keep watching, the plot is okay
I started watching, hoping to compete with Li Bochuan
The overall plot is okay, I like all kinds of stories about the Three Kingdoms
It's so well written.
Well written and worth reading. Come on, author!
It's awesome. I fell in love after reading a few chapters. If you are uneducated, you can only say: Damn, it's so good. Come on, author!
Very beautiful, highly recommended! I just read it yesterday. I stayed up late last night and listened to the novel. The more I listened to it, the more energetic I became. I didn't sleep all night... [The masterpiece of Bird Food] [Grass has been planted] [Please update]
A rare good book on the subject of the Three Kingdoms, it can be ranked in the top five. Five-star praise. I actually ran out of it. It will take some time to watch again!
It's well written. The more I read it, the more addictive it becomes. It's a pity that it's over and I have to feed myself again [shy]
The author has great literary talent, clear ideas, and smooth chapters, so read it slowly.
It's well written, but the reasoning in Chapter 10 is wrong. Reasoning process Known conditions: 1. Three people: A, B, and C, one is the murderer and two are innocent; 2. A: I did not kill anyone; B: A did not kill anyone; C: B did not kill anyone; 3. Only one person told the truth and the other two lied. Scenario 1: Suppose A tells the truth (A is not guilty) - Jia Zhen → Jia did not kill anyone - If B says "A has not killed", which is consistent with A, then B is also telling the truth. At this time, A and B are telling the truth, which violates "only one person is telling the truth" and is not valid. Situation 2: Suppose B tells the truth (A is not guilty) - Yizhen → A did not kill anyone - A said "I didn't kill", which is also true. A and B are both true, but do not meet the conditions and are not established. Scenario 3: Suppose C tells the truth (B is not guilty) There is only one truth from C, and both A and B must be lies: 1. A is a lie → A killed someone; 2. B is a lie → "A did not kill" is false, proving that A killed someone; 3. C tells the truth: B did not kill, which means that only A is the murderer. There is no contradiction. Conclusion A is the murderer
See Chapter 174: I have seen before that a son of Cao Cao broke up because he prevented his father from slaughtering the city, and then seized the territory of Xuzhou and Yuan Shu. The civilians elected village chiefs, held imperial examinations, and opened debating halls. The plots are very similar [face covering]. The difference is that the men in black robes united with Cao Cao and Liu Sun to fight against him. Liu failed many times to unite Sun and foreigners and add plague attacks. I don't know if I learned something from it?
Very well written, as always, five stars.
Well written, good work, energetic, no loss of status. Although I chose three harems, most of them are about foreign wars, which is good. It's not like some brainless and cool articles, which spend more than ten chapters all day long lingering with women [eating melon] [eating melon] [eating melon]
This novel not only contains strategies and wars, but also the late Eastern Han Dynasty from a civilian perspective.
I can read this novel and feel so healed that even if I read it again, I may not feel bored. It is really good and I like to read it. If I can choose to time travel, I hope to be able to travel to this era.
The rating shouldn't be so low, I personally think it's pretty good
Although it's not perfect, it's worth watching General🖖😭🖖
The first ten or so chapters were not very good, but the later chapters got better and better.
Well written. I can read it. The author has done a great job.
There has to be someone writing about the Three Kingdoms. This perspective is not bad.
This is a Three Kingdoms-themed novel worth reading.
The writing is good, the design is reasonable, there are no poisonous points, and it is worth a read.
It looks okay so far
It's okay, I can keep watching, the plot is okay
I started watching, hoping to compete with Li Bochuan
The overall plot is okay, I like all kinds of stories about the Three Kingdoms
It's so well written.
Well written and worth reading. Come on, author!
It's awesome. I fell in love after reading a few chapters. If you are uneducated, you can only say: Damn, it's so good. Come on, author!
Very beautiful, highly recommended! I just read it yesterday. I stayed up late last night and listened to the novel. The more I listened to it, the more energetic I became. I didn't sleep all night... [The masterpiece of Bird Food] [Grass has been planted] [Please update]
A rare good book on the subject of the Three Kingdoms, it can be ranked in the top five. Five-star praise. I actually ran out of it. It will take some time to watch again!
It's well written. The more I read it, the more addictive it becomes. It's a pity that it's over and I have to feed myself again [shy]
The author has great literary talent, clear ideas, and smooth chapters, so read it slowly.
Come on, the author [laughs evilly]
This book is very good
Very satisfied, really to my liking
Good, good, good, good!
Very nice novel
Very beautiful and worth recommending!