The Gods Came to Collect Their Debt, But First I Want an Invoice!

💩I really found gold here. The whole story puts aside the world view and other things. The underlying structure is more like a lawyer investigating a case, but the writing is really exciting and beautiful. It makes me popular. I am really afraid of discontinuing the update. What's up. Letter to the author: But there are a few places where I really feel inconsistent. Everyone in it seems to know something. It is like an unspoken rule that everyone knows, and this set of unspoken rules is quite complicated. As a result, from the perspective of the protagonist, it is not just the look and feel of the Riddler, but a complete set of mountain codes with extremely complex rules but that run smoothly. When I watched it, I wanted to peel away this layer of fog to understand its essence, so it was very uncomfortable to watch, but it is really beautiful👍👍👍 The above is my previous comment. After Chapter 35, the traces of AI are getting heavier and heavier. I don't understand, I don't understand. I sincerely think this book is beautiful. I even read it in the novel group I am in. . . However, the traces of AI are too heavy, resulting in inconsistent logic. I take back the 5-point rating and give 2 points to the subject matter and world view.

The subject matter is novel enough. Logic is also online. It can even map some real-life problems. On the surface, I feel that it is quite satisfying to overturn the other party's evidence one by one, but the underlying feeling is that I feel aggrieved. The other side has been using coercion and inducement as well as using evidence taken out of context and fabricated. There was no punishment at all after being overthrown one by one. Behind the protagonist there is a mysterious person who has been providing clues and routes, and the plot seems exciting and fast-paced. But the same routine has been used, and it seems to be procrastinating. Wang Doudou counts it as a side task, and his own problem is the main task. Now it is a simple and crude overturning of perjury. The overturning of perjury promotes the main task like a running account. Even if you complete more side tasks to weaken the opponent, all the clues will finally come together to complete the main task. It will be more exciting than now.

I'll go. It's such a novel theme. Why is it so low-scoring? I've seen it looks pretty good so far. Forget it, I take it back. I think it usually has three stars at most. The world view is not perfect and the writing is very streamlined.

The writing is good and the plot is good. Listening and reading is not as good as reading. The characters have distinct personalities and the rhythm is reasonable. It is worth reading than 85% of the books. However, the traces of imitation are heavy and it looks like it was produced by an assembly line. Come on, author, you can write better.

It's very interesting. From an angle that I have never thought of, the world prays to the gods, but do the gods also owe debts to the world? Yes, yes.

The subject matter is novel, the writing is not bad, the description is average, and you can read it👍 The evidence content in Chapters 51 and 52 is highly repetitive and is suspected to be traces of AI.

The subject matter is novel, and the brain-burning humor will make it easier to read. It feels like it is as popular as Ten Days End and I'm Not a Drama God. No kidding, the follow-up should not be unfinished and the writing is too clumsy. It has this potential.

The subject matter is very good, and the writing is also very good. I haven't read much of it, but looking at it now, the plot is a bit delayed. The author seems to be a little repetitive in order to write that kind of numb feeling. There are a lot of language descriptions and detailed descriptions, but it feels very satisfying. I can feel that the author is writing about the helpless feeling of the protagonist. Overall, the book is quite good, and the rating should not be high. Well, I don't know if it's because of reading other comments. I think he is writing for Al. It's true that there is something wrong with the writing. The author didn't come out to clarify. I don't know if it's acquiescence, but it's actually okay.

The setting of this book is good. This is the first time I have read a book with such a plot. It is very strange. It is a very logical book. I feel that the author understands the legal provisions very well. I have to read it chapter by chapter. If I miss a little bit, my brain will be buggy. If the score is not high, it does not mean that the writing is not good, because there are not many people reading it. It just doesn't have enough plot to support the composition of the novel, the characters aren't fleshed out enough, and the plot isn't conflicting enough. It only makes sense when analyzed logically. A very strange book. I always feel that something is weird. I can watch it, but I don't want to watch it because I feel tired after watching it.

Real gold has been found in the shit, the writing is good, the subject matter is new, the protagonist is very rigorous, the characters are all interesting and vivid, and the details are very good. It makes people slowly and slowly read carefully, but there is no way to be assimilated by tomatoes. I only like to read some cool articles. I can only say that I will give this author a five-star rating because he is very rigorous.