Reborn as a Max-Level Imperial Princess, I Only Want to Industrialize

The image is very strong, but the description is too straightforward and too detailed. I hope there is appropriate white space.

Let me evaluate myself first

The author is so prolific. Each chapter is at least 5,000 words, and as many as 6,000. Some of the chapters are even 7,000 and almost 8,000. This is written for myself, for my own reading, and travels lightly. There are no targets to be achieved to restrict or push me. Seeing this, I feel relieved and will not worry about the ratings. The feedback is not good, the actual rewards are not enough and it is unfinished or stagnant. I really hope to keep writing. It is great. Unlike many industrial articles of the same type, industrial development and planning and governance are all covered in one go. You can go as fast as you can. It mainly focuses on how the protagonist kills others. The development process is very detailed.

This is the first time in my life that I am writing a review for this book. The corner of my mouth is slightly curved, which is a sentence of affirmation. The writing is excellent and full of details. The mind is good and bad. For example: the little maid is so rude to the master. If it were a palace fighting drama, she would have been sent to the army long ago. Blushing again for no reason. There are some Japanese kana mixed in, but the background is Europe, what does it mean? Too much detail is also a problem. It's like a constipated person entering the toilet without a mobile phone. He has thought about the color, shape, pattern, smell, size, history, humanities, philosophy, ingredients, production process, usage, precautions, suggestions and opinions, future prospects, chemical composition, physical structure, biosafety, and medical uses of the toilet paper on the handle, but he has not finished pooping. I'll take another look.

The writing is very good~~ It feels like reading a published novel, that is, a physical novel 👍

The writing is slow and chewy. Like a slowly unfolding poem, it flows very lightly and slowly. This rhythm is very relaxing. Well, the article repeatedly emphasizes something, being close to nature, and turning industry into poetry, which are all very good ideas. This book is really suitable as a background wall. It can really slow people down when running or before going to bed. This is a rare place. I hope the author can maintain it. However, when reading other comments, I found that the author feeds his own writing to AI for polishing. The mention here is not to express disgust, but to hope that the author can pay attention to some things that are repeatedly emphasized. It is better not to use similar or identical words over and over again. If it must be emphasized, it can actually be expressed in a variety of expressions and in a special way that suits each character. This should be better.

The author's writing style is very good, and some of the characters that I have read so far are quite good. For example, when writing about the personal maid, the author did not define her as "lively and smart", but wrote about her "hard" reaction at the royal banquet, and about her collecting colored pebbles in the college creek, and enriching the image through the comments of her seniors, which is very vivid. In addition, the author will write some idle notes, so that the sense of life is strong. It's pretty good if you have the time to watch it.

This book is very interesting. The narrative style is that of a typical road novel, but it also has its own main plot, which is amazing. The biggest shortcoming is that the writing is too flat, without emotional fluctuations, and it is easy for readers to "fall asleep". The beginning almost made me quit, but the content is worth reading carefully, and the author, where is I Lily? 🤔

Setting is still more important than anything else. There is still no crisis at the beginning, which is good for those who like to see the setting, but those who don't may not be able to watch it.

To summarize the sentence structure: A: Asked if A is willing; B: Did it answer? A: It (didn't) answer, but () A: It B, not because of one or two, but because I asked and it answered. Continue to make up for it A hurts, B hurts, C hurts No A, no B, but (only) C, but D