Rebirth, tennis, talent and hard work, injuries and breakthroughs, the long climb.
Retired at the age of twenty-seven and was reborn at the age of fourteen. In his previous life, his wrist was broken and his dreams were shattered. In this life, he wants to win back all the winning points that he didn't score one by one.
Reader comments
The writing is good, but Fang is more like the protagonist. The protagonist is a professional athlete who has played for so many years in his previous life. He needs Fang, a player of the same age, to tell him how to target the players in each game and help him lay out tactics, but he is defeated by Fang.
Even though you knew that your wrists were not good in your previous life, you still persisted in playing every match due to wrist problems. I can understand why you said you won't give up in the finals, but why can't you give up in a match that hasn't even started yet? Otherwise, stop mentioning the protagonist's skills all the time.
Nowadays, readers like to read cool articles. You can write a more realistic version, but there are people of the same age in the protagonist group, who are slowly surpassing the protagonist in each game. The statistics of tennis that he was so powerful in his teens are not like what can be seen in reality. Why should such a supporting role be set in a realistic article? It is recommended to set Fang as the protagonist.
Or set Fang to be a famous general in the previous life, with extraordinary talents, which the protagonist could not match in the previous life. In this life, the two people are chasing each other, instead of the protagonist being caught up step by step. In the end, both Fang and the protagonist are world-famous generals, and the protagonist can defeat Fang and stand on top of the world. Otherwise, inexplicably, a member of the protagonist group is stronger than the protagonist and progresses faster than the protagonist. Then why are you reborn? Just write the first life. But there are so many legends in the real tennis world. Why write a non-existent genius to compete with the protagonist? Isn't it good to write a foreign frenemy?
The character descriptions are a bit flat, and the language descriptions are all in the same tone.
The writing is good, but Fang is more like the protagonist. The protagonist is a professional athlete who has played for so many years in his previous life. He needs Fang, a player of the same age, to tell him how to target the players in each game and help him lay out tactics, but he is defeated by Fang. Even though you knew that your wrists were not good in your previous life, you still persisted in playing every match due to wrist problems. I can understand why you said you won't give up in the finals, but why can't you give up in a match that hasn't even started yet? Otherwise, stop mentioning the protagonist's skills all the time. Nowadays, readers like to read cool articles. You can write a more realistic version, but there are people of the same age in the protagonist group, who are slowly surpassing the protagonist in each game. The statistics of tennis that he was so powerful in his teens are not like what can be seen in reality. Why should such a supporting role be set in a realistic article? It is recommended to set Fang as the protagonist. Or set Fang to be a famous general in the previous life, with extraordinary talents, which the protagonist could not match in the previous life. In this life, the two people are chasing each other, instead of the protagonist being caught up step by step. In the end, both Fang and the protagonist are world-famous generals, and the protagonist can defeat Fang and stand on top of the world. Otherwise, inexplicably, a member of the protagonist group is stronger than the protagonist and progresses faster than the protagonist. Then why are you reborn? Just write the first life. But there are so many legends in the real tennis world. Why write a non-existent genius to compete with the protagonist? Isn't it good to write a foreign frenemy?
The character descriptions are a bit flat, and the language descriptions are all in the same tone.