Three Months After Our Divorce, I Ran into My CEO Ex-Wife with a Slightly Rounded Belly. I Was Stunned

There are too many inconsistencies: The first child: the child of the heroine and the hero, was aborted on the day of their divorce. Then one week before the male protagonist left the country (two months and three weeks after the divorce), after the farewell party, the male and female protagonists slept together again. The second child: Later, when the male and female protagonists met, they said it was three months after the divorce when the male protagonist went abroad. That was the last time we had sex, one week later. The hero sees that the heroine is pregnant. However, the child they had before the divorce had been aborted. They had a relationship after the divorce only one week before the male lead left the country, and there was no sign of a child at all. The third child: It is said that the heroine used the sperm stored in the hospital to make a test tube before the hero returned to China. (Divorced 3 months + half a year) After the male protagonist went abroad for half a year (not specified how many months), he didn't say how long after returning to China. The time for prenatal check-up was three and a half months. The conflicting point is whether the second child exists or not? If it didn't exist, how could the male protagonist find out that she was pregnant when she went abroad (and she was at least three months old, because she had just aborted one during the divorce) (the female protagonist admitted that she was pregnant at the time), then it must exist. If this child exists, whose child is it? (It couldn't be the male protagonist's, because the last time she had sex was a week before leaving the country, and she couldn't tell she was pregnant.) Did she give birth or have it aborted? The second child can only be justified if the child is aborted. Because, in vitro fertilization must be done at least two or three months in advance before the male protagonist returns to China. Only if half a year is calculated as 9 months, (9-2) + 3 = 10 months, can the second child be born between the abortion of the first child and the pregnancy of the third child. Therefore, it is more reasonable to abort it.

Marvelous!!!!!!! 👍👍👍

Good spelling🤮🤮

Stop licking, you can't even boil sheep.